You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Conyers Releases Nonpartisan CRS Report on Federal Response to Hurricane Katrina
2005-09-13
And he wouldn't lie, would he?
WASHINGTON - September 13 - Conyers Releases Non-Partisan Congressional Research Service Report on Federal Response to Hurricane Katrina:

Report Confirms that Louisiana Took Necessary and Timely Steps

Pursuant to a September 7 request by Representative John Conyers to review the law and legal accountability relating to Federal action in response to Hurricane Katrina, the Congressional Research Service (CRS) issued a report today about whether the Governor of Louisiana took the necessary and timely steps needed to secure disaster relief from the federal government. The report unequivocally concludes that she did.

Congressman Conyers issued the following statement:

"This report closes the book on the Bush Administration's attempts to evade accountability by shifting the blame to the Governor of Louisiana for the Administration's tragically sluggish response to Katrina. It confirms that the Governor did everything she could to secure relief for the people of Louisiana and the Bush Administration was caught napping at a critical time."

In addition to finding that "...it would appear that the Governor did take the steps necessary to request emergency and major disaster declarations for the State of Louisiana in anticipation of Hurricane Katrina. (p.11)" The report found that:

* All necessary conditions for federal relief were met on August 28. Pursuant to Section 502 of the Stafford Act, "[t]he declaration of an emergency by the President makes Federal emergency assistance available," and the President made such a declaration on August 28. The public record indicates that several additional days passed before such assistance was actually made available to the State;

* The Governor must make a timely request for such assistance, which meets the requirements of federal law. The report states that "[e]xcept to the extent that an emergency involves primarily Federal interests, both declarations of major disaster and declarations of emergency must be triggered by a request to the President from the Governor of the affected state";

* The Governor did indeed make such a request, which was both timely and in compliance with federal law. The report finds that "Governor Kathleen Babineaux Blanco requested by letter dated August 27, 2005...that the President declare an emergency for the State of Louisiana due to Hurricane Katrina for the time period from August 26, 2005 and continuing pursuant to [applicable Federal statute]" and "Governor Blanco's August 27, 2005 request for an emergency declaration also included her determination...that 'the incident is of such severity and magnitude that effective response is beyond the capabilities of the State and affected local governments and that supplementary Federal assistance is necessary to save lives, protect property, public health, and safety, or to lessen or avert the threat of disaster."
Well, I guess we don't need that investigation then, do we?
Posted by:Steve

#8  If Conyers read it, it must be in small words, extry large print and lotsa pictures. Stupid racist partisan f*&k
Posted by: Frank G   2005-09-13 21:31  

#7  "This report closes the book on the Bush Administration's attempts to evade accountability by shifting the blame to the Governor of Louisiana for the Administration's tragically sluggish response to Katrina...the Bush Administration was caught napping at a critical time."

Oh yeah, non partisan and definitely non biased as well.
Posted by: Andy   2005-09-13 20:17  

#6  the Congressional Research Service (CRS)

What in the hell is that? Public or private?
Posted by: Secret Master   2005-09-13 19:19  

#5  This is not new. Isn't the kicker exactly WHAT federal assistance was necessary?

IIRC all she asked for was money, true?
Posted by: AlanC   2005-09-13 18:00  

#4  What is sad is that people of his ilk (LLL Moonbats) don’t realize how stupid that actually sound to the majority of Americans. Also it’s sad that Conyers and his ilk will most certainly be re-elected by the moonbats they represent. This is just like the “Mock Impeachment” hearing he held with a lineup of moonbats from around the country, even CSPAN cut coverage after they realized what a kangaroo court they were covering.
Posted by: Cyber Sarge   2005-09-13 17:18  

#3  Yes, whenever I need all my Moonbat News, Common Dreams Progressive Newswire is right there at the top of my viewing list.
And speaking of investigations there, congressman, did ya ever figure out what happened with those Thanksgiving turkeys? Why don't you get the Non-Partisan Congressional Research Service right on that? It only took them a couple of weeks to figure out New Orleans, so I figure we'll have an answer like tomorrow, right?
Posted by: tu3031   2005-09-13 16:51  

#2  Conyers is not a name I would expect to see associated with the term "Non-partisan".

I need to travel to HELL for some nice frozen ice-cream.
Posted by: 3dc   2005-09-13 16:50  

#1  And it only took a week! So we're done? Can we get back to Aruba news, now?
Posted by: Bobby   2005-09-13 16:42  

00:00