You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Yemeni tried for being Bin Laden’s driver
2005-07-24
Prosecutors called him Bin Laden’s bodyguard and close affiliate, the defense say he is just a simple man who needed to work. Salim Ahmed Hamdan, 35 years old is a Yemeni man who worked as bin Ladin’s driver in and worked mostly on bin Laden’s Kandahar farm for a $200-a-month salary because he needed the work — not out of ideological commitment.
"I never liked him. I only joined the party for business reasons..."
A three-judge panel for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit unanimously upheld President Bush’s war powers to create a Military Commission to try Hamdan, of Yemen. The Yemeni captive, who has a fourth-grade education, worked as a driver for the al-Qaida mastermind from 1996 until his capture in 2001. But he denies joining al-Qaida.
"Really! I wuz just cheap muscle!... Ummm.... I mean, I only drove the car!"
Moreover, Judge A. Raymond Randolph wrote in a 22-page decision that, as chief executive and commander in chief, Bush could deny terrorism captives prisoner-of-war status as outlined by the Geneva Conventions. The decision was the latest chapter in the 3-year-old legal struggle over presidential powers to detain and sometimes put on trial so-called enemy combatants in the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales said the court validated a Bush administration distinction “between terrorists and those who legitimately wage war.”
The current crop of Bad Guyz aren't covered. Even if they would be covered, they're specifically not covered because they don't adhere to the conventions.
Hamdan’s lawyers vowed to appeal.
That's what lawyers do, isn't it?
Both sides have said they expect the issue to ultimately reach the U.S. Supreme Court. The full 12-member Appeals Court could hear the case first. It was unclear, however, whether the Defense Department would reconvene its so-called Military Commissions in the interim. The defense team protested Friday’s decision, saying it “gives the president the raw authority to expand military tribunals without limit, threatening the system of international law and armed conflict worldwide.” At issue is the Bush administration’s decision to draw up a new formula for Military Commissions that borrows from both World War I and World War II experiences.
Back in my day, U.S. law was based on precedent, not what Carla del Ponte thinks...
Friday’s decision overruled U.S. District Court Judge James Robertson, a Navy veteran who was appointed by President Clinton. He ridiculed Bush’s war court as providing fewer protections than the Pentagon’s own Uniform Code of Military Justice and ruled that the president cannot unilaterally create commissions or confer a blanket category of enemy combatants on captives. The appeals court replied that, even if Congress has not formally declared war, it has granted the president power to craft a military commission. Hamdan was the first to face a military trial in August 2004 after U.S. officials alleged that he helped the al Qaeda leader ferry weapons and flee after the 1998 bombings of U.S. embassies in East Africa and the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. Hamdan has been charged with murder, terrorism, conspiracy to commit attacks on civilians and civilian objects, and destruction of property by an unprivileged belligerent.
"Really. I just drove the car. That ain't me in the pictures..."
In addition to Mr. Hamdan and David Hicks, the Pentagon named two detainees as facing trial: Yemeni-born Ali Hamza Ahmad Sulayman al Bahlul and Sudanese Ibrahim Ahmed Mahmound al Qosi. Each is charged with murder and conspiring to launch attacks on civilians. Mr. Bush has designated eight other Guantanamo detainees for trial, and the Pentagon said charges would be filed.
Soon, we hope.
The special Office of Military Commissions at the Pentagon already has filed charges against Mr. Hamdan and Mr. Hicks. The charges say Mr. Hamdan met bin Laden in 1996 in Kandahar, Afghanistan, the spiritual headquarters of the hard-line Taliban regime. Mr. Hamdan became a bodyguard, driver and dispenser of weapons to al Qaeda members. In Mr. Hicks’ case, the charges say he converted to Islam from Christianity in Australia. He traveled to Afghanistan in early 2001 and attended al Qaeda terrorist training camps. He engaged in combat against U.S. forces before being captured.
Posted by:Fred

#9  Remember, Frank:

"I've got a little list..." Keep it between your ears.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2005-07-24 22:16  

#8  Well, the Ninth Circus Circuit court ruled it's OK to say you wish someone would kill the President, so why not a judge? Just because someone would threaten them. They wouldn't be that petty would they?

Oh. Right.
Posted by: Jackal   2005-07-24 20:43  

#7  hey i thought about it too!
Posted by: Red Dog   2005-07-24 20:20  

#6  Don't even think about it, Frank, unless you have your tinfoil hat on!
Posted by: Bobby   2005-07-24 15:41  

#5  fair enuf
Posted by: Frank G   2005-07-24 14:57  

#4  Steve is right, Frank. Don't do it to yourself or to RB .... even jokingly. Given recent attacks on judges, this is not something the feds are likely to have a sense of humor about.
Posted by: rkb   2005-07-24 14:41  

#3  Frank: don't do that. Don't even joke about it. That just leads to trouble. T'anks. AoS.
Posted by: Steve White   2005-07-24 14:34  

#2  I think the attorneys should be personally thanked by Americans for defending the rights of these fine young men. Anyone have any home addresses or telephone numbers? Judge Robertson too. I have a message for him
Posted by: Frank G   2005-07-24 13:15  

#1  Good! If driving Terrorist1 isn't aiding and abetting, then I would like to know what is.
Posted by: Vlad the Muslim Impaler   2005-07-24 12:39  

00:00