You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Rove's Past (and soon-to-be) Crimes
2005-07-14
If you go to the link, you'll have to advance to page 16. DC Examiner. By Tony Snow.

If you want sure proof of America’s moral inversion, consider this: For allegedly refusing to tell a lie, George Washington became a man of legend. For telling the truth, Karl Rove became Public Enemy No. 1. Let us review the summer’s preeminent political scandal. Two years ago, Karl Rove cautioned Time magazine reporter Matt Cooper against believing a story detailed by former diplomat Joseph Wilson.

Wilson wrote in The New York Times: (a) that he, Joseph Wilson, had been dispatched by Dick Cheney to conduct a secret mission to Niger where he was to ascertain whether that nation had sold yellowcake uranium to Saddam Hussein; (b) that he, Joseph Wilson, sipped tea with local diplomatic and governmental worthies who assured him nothing was going on; and (c) that he, Joseph Wilson, concluded that the president lied during a State of the Union address by accusing “African” nations
of selling uranium to Iraq. Democrats swiftly accused the president of lying his way into the war and the press pounced.

The problem was that Wilson was playing fast and loose with the facts. In Niger, he behaved less like James Bond than Maxwell Smart — blustering, strutting, preening — and posturing as an important personage. With this as background, Rove warned reporters that Wilson’s grandiose claim of having been tapped by the vice president (which he later expanded to include the director of the C.I.A.) was fictional. The person who engineered the hiring was Wilson’s wife, who, Rove added, worked on weapons of mass destruction for the CIA.

When Robert Novak rehearsed the facts in a column and included the name of Wilson’s wife, the former diplomat exploded. He hotly denied that she got him the job. He huffed that the missus was a “covert” agent who had been exposed because he, Joe Wilson, had dared expose the White House.
In subsequent retellings by Howard Dean and other Democrats, Mrs. Wilson became Wonder Woman,
risking death while fighting on the “front lines of the war on terror.” Before long, the engines of justice
began to chuff and churn. A Senate panel discovered that Wilson’s wife, Valerie Plame, did indeed recommend him for the trip. Wilson’s report to the State Department, contrary to his New York Times account, mildly seconded the administration’s theory that crime bosses in Niger had retailed weapons-ready uranium to Saddam. Further probes by British intelligence revealed that African nations had sold yellowcake to the despot, making Joseph Wilson three-for- three on getting things wrong.

Meanwhile, the president appointed a special counsel, Patrick Fitzgerald. He asked Fitzgerald to determine whether the mere mention of Plame’s name violated the Intelligence Identities Protection Act, which makes it illegal to (a) knowingly reveal the name of a “covert agent” who has worked undercover in a foreign country within the past five years, (b) with the aim of blowing that person’s cover and (c) attempting to undermine the nation’s intelligence-gathering capabilities. The answer is no: Plame hadn’t been a covert agent in years (if she ever had been) and she wasn’t acting as if the revelation had plunged her into mortal peril. She and her hubby went on a whirlwind tour of the East Coast social circuit, beaming and posing for glitzy photos from Washington to New York. Here are Rove’s sins: He answered a reporter’s phone call. He tried to protect the journalist from publishing a false account. He mentioned Wilson’s wife without mentioning her name. He agreed to release reporters from promises to keep his identity and information confidential. (He did this 18 months ago.) He cooperated with the special counsel. He broke no law. He told the truth. Democrats, so quick to demand equal protection for Guantanamo-based terrorists, have demanded Rove’s defenestration without so much as reciting his Miranda Rights. Reporters, meanwhile, seemed more offended that Rove attempted to correct their errors than that Joe Wilson played them for chumps. But being a Washington political figure means never having to say you’re sorry — which is why this story
is destined for one more turn. When the truth proves deeply embarrassing for Joseph Wilson, Democrats and the press corps, the president’s foes will resort to one final gambit.

They will claim the entire controversy was orchestrated by — you guessed it — Karl Rove.
Posted by:Bobby

#38  Oops! Forgot the /

"I left because I was fed up with .com, Tom and Frank G calling Aris an "attention whore" and because I was fed up with Poison Reverse's "it's all about meeeeeee" responses to all Aris's comments."

I feel very privileged to be put in the same category as FG, Tom, & .com.
Posted by: Poison Reverse   2005-07-14 22:40  

#37  "I left because I was fed up with .com, Tom and Frank G calling Aris an "attention whore" and because I was fed up with Poison Reverse's "it's all about meeeeeee" responses to all Aris's comments."

I feel very privileged to be put in the same category as FG, Tom, & .com.
Posted by: Poison Reverse   2005-07-14 22:39  

#36  It's not a discussion when one side pirouettes...
Posted by: Pappy   2005-07-14 20:18  

#35  Mike got a new Tranzi friend too! Whee!
Posted by: Shipman   2005-07-14 19:37  

#34  Just for once....
Another reason I left is that the low quality of discussion here. Another reason I left is that the low quality of discussion here. Another reason I left is that the low quality of discussion here. Another reason I left is that the low quality of discussion here.

LOL

Posted by: Shipman   2005-07-14 19:36  

#33  God bless Joe Wilson, as he has succeeded like no one else to exposure the Dummycrats as the incarnate of Act Out.

Thus far, the Dummytude have pointed their finger at virtually anything that has reached D.C. (homeland security, Gitmo, Iraq, torture, Abu Ghriab, etc.) and have gained no traction.

But no other topic like the Dummycrats supporting an out-and-out lieing, sanctimous, pompous, self aggrandizer like Wilson could have insured complete Dummyratic defeat in the '06 and '08 elections.

Thank you Joe Wilson, the gift that keeps on giving.
Posted by: Captain America   2005-07-14 18:51  

#32  Wow Mike, you've just opened my eyes! The next time my employer's president's secretary calls and asks me to meet with a client, I'll be sure to introduce myself to the client and state that she, the secretary, considers them a vital customer, and identifying and satisfying their needs is important her and me.

Better yet, I have yet to see where she, a secretary, is in my org chart chain of command. What is a secretary doing ordering me around. Guess I'll just tell her where to get off. Thanks again! Your gift just keeps on giving. I think I will offer your wisdom at the next staff meeting. I'll call it "Sylwester's Serious Semantic Shenanigans" in your honor.
Posted by: ed   2005-07-14 17:52  

#31  But Steve, doesn't he hafta speak english to be understood?
Posted by: Bobby   2005-07-14 16:58  

#30  Okay people:

Mike S hasn't and doesn't violate any Rantburg rules. He's welcome to post. You're welcome to reply. Flame wars solve nothing and waste both time and bandwidth.
Posted by: Steve White   2005-07-14 15:58  

#29  Is this the summertime sausage story between a deadly hurricane and the next missing child drama? Clearly that is what the Republican spin-cycle would prefer us to believe. Or does this one stink like a loaf on the Whitehouse lawn so big that Barney the Terrier would need a transfusion? The Left smells blood. Predictably they are unable to control their impulses. All they can see is what appears to be the pale underbelly of their arch-nemesis. It doesn’t much matter that no one has been charged with a crime let-alone found guilty. Heads must roll! But make no mistake the stench has lingered through all the confidential source blather. The RNC had no choice but to take it up a notch. Bamn! Circle the bandwagons and make sure the message points have been distributed. The RNC synopsis of their Message Points document reads, “Mr. Rove was attempting to advise a reporter about potential inaccuracies in a story that he was writing later, were proved to be incorrect. The attacks by Democrats are clearly political in nature.” So there you have it. Move along…nothing to see here folks. One Old Spook said, there simply is no “there” there. Maybe he’s right. Either way, dust off your Propaganda 101 cause it already reeks on both sides.
Posted by: DepotGuy   2005-07-14 15:09  

#28  hurry along Mike, the short bus has arrived to take you on your way.
Posted by: 2b   2005-07-14 14:17  

#27  Why don't you be moving along then?
Posted by: Neutron Tom   2005-07-14 14:11  

#26  Tony Snow:
Wilson wrote in The New York Times: (a) that he, Joseph Wilson, had been dispatched by Dick Cheney to conduct a secret mission to Niger

Joseph Wilson:
In February 2002, I was informed by officials at the Central Intelligence Agency that Vice President Dick Cheney's office had questions about a particular intelligence report. While I never saw the report, I was told that it referred to a memorandum of agreement that documented the sale of uranium yellowcake — a form of lightly processed ore — by Niger to Iraq in the late 1990's. The agency officials asked if I would travel to Niger to check out the story so they could provide a response to the vice president's office.

After consulting with the State Department's African Affairs Bureau (and through it with Barbro Owens-Kirkpatrick, the United States ambassador to Niger), I agreed to make the trip. The mission I undertook was discreet but by no means secret. While the C.I.A. paid my expenses (my time was offered pro bono), I made it abundantly clear to everyone I met that I was acting on behalf of the United States government

----------

Another reason I left is that the low quality of discussion here. Most of it's just demagoguery, as on the responses about this issue right here.
.
Posted by: Mike Sylwester   2005-07-14 13:58  

#25  I'll keep your response in mind, Ed, whenever I contemplate whether you are a serious person.

!

This coming from the fellow who believes the Iraqis should have to pay for investigations into the fraud committed against them.

Thank God Sylwester's back. There weren't enough clowns around.
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2005-07-14 13:41  

#24  At some point you just have to say, "yeah, I did it what are you going to do about it"?
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2005-07-14 13:27  

#23  Read it again:

Wilson wrote in The New York Times: (a) that he, Joseph Wilson, had been dispatched by Dick Cheney to conduct a secret mission to Niger

I'll keep your response in mind, Ed, whenever I contemplate whether you are a serious person.
.
.
Posted by: Mike Sylwester   2005-07-14 13:25  

#22  Yes. Wilson said Vice President Dick Cheney had questions, and Wilson was asked to go to Niger. What Wilson wrote makes it clear he was going to Niger on the behest of the VP. Cheney didn't personally select Wilson to go to Niger, but when the VP has questions, someone was going to investigate on his behest. Wilson's wife offered him up and he agreed to go.

Here is another Wislon quote: "The question was asked of the CIA by the office of the vice president. The office of the vice president, I am absolutely convinced, received a very specific response to the question it asked and that response was based upon my trip out there."
Posted by: ed   2005-07-14 12:32  

#21  Re #20 (ed)
The question I posed is whether the following quotation by Tony Snow is a valid characterization.

Wilson wrote in The New York Times: (a) that he, Joseph Wilson, had been dispatched by Dick Cheney to conduct a secret mission to Niger

Do you, Ed, think that's a valid characterization of what Wilson wrote?
.
Posted by: Mike Sylwester   2005-07-14 12:12  

#20  What I Didn't Find in Africa By JOSEPH C. WILSON 4th
In February 2002, I was informed by officials at the Central Intelligence Agency that Vice President Dick Cheney's office had questions about a particular intelligence report. While I never saw the report, I was told that it referred to a memorandum of agreement that documented the sale of uranium yellowcake — a form of lightly processed ore — by Niger to Iraq in the late 1990's. The agency officials asked if I would travel to Niger to check out the story so they could provide a response to the vice president's office.

Of course, it was his wife, Valerie Plame, who reccomended him for the assignment.
Posted by: ed   2005-07-14 11:57  

#19  The 'Opinion' section, Mr. Slywester? Isn't that like Jayson Blair making a comeback by working for the Penny Saver
Posted by: Pappy   2005-07-14 11:54  

#18  I, for one, welcome those from the cold, if they can be civil. An echo chamber is not interesting or challenging. I don't recall Mike going off the rails too often. I just regret he's the best they're willing to send in.
Posted by: Mrs. Davis   2005-07-14 11:42  

#17  Hey, still holding out for Kofi Annan's innocence? Or have you dropped him for Joe Wilson?

I notice you're playing semantic games with the "Cheney asked" bit, rather than focusing on some essential facts:

o Wilson said his wife didn't suggest him. Senate Intelligence Committee says he lied.

o Wilson said he found no evidence of Iraq trying to get uranium. SIC says he lied.

Why should we believe a claim that's supported only by sloppy parsing of what he wrote when his major claims are complete BS?
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2005-07-14 11:06  

#16  I called you an "attention whore" too, MS. But what you really should be called is a "SINK-TRAPPED TROLL".
Posted by: Neutron Tom   2005-07-14 10:58  

#15  Re #13 (Robert Crawford): He left because he couldn't stand admitting he got all his goddamned facts wrong, right?

I left because I was fed up with .com, Tom and Frank G calling Aris an "attention whore" and because I was fed up with Poison Reverse's "it's all about meeeeeee" responses to all Aris's comments.

I came back because I missed you, Robert.
.
Posted by: Mike Sylwester   2005-07-14 10:55  

#14  Re: #10 (Old Spook) -- that is a redacted version - Joe Wilson implies (as you can see) that Cheney sent him - and his public comments subsequent to the NYT article show him making those claims: Cheney sent him to the CIA, the CIA wanted him there, etc etc.

Can you provide the different words he used in his original NYT article?
.
Posted by: Mike Sylwester   2005-07-14 10:52  

#13  Isn't MS a Kennedy Konspiracy Kook?

Mikey's a lying sack o' crap. His defense of Joe "Mint Tea" Wilson is just more evidence of same.

I do NOT welcome MS back. I hope he will leave again for the same reason that he left months ago.

He left because he couldn't stand admitting he got all his goddamned facts wrong, right?
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2005-07-14 10:42  

#12  Ignore the lying UN-defender. Moral equivalence with terror makes him as big a scumbag as the asshats he droolingly defends. Go back to your hole MS, cretin
Posted by: Frank G   2005-07-14 10:31  

#11  I do NOT welcome MS back. I hope he will leave again for the same reason that he left months ago. His return is NOT a positive development at Rantburg. Finding him here again has ruined my day.
Posted by: Neutron Tom   2005-07-14 10:26  

#10  LEt me rephrase - that is a redacted version - Joe Wilson implies (as you can see) that Cheney sent him - and his public comments subsequent to the NYT article show him making those claims: Cheney sent him to the CIA, the CIA wanted him there, etc etc.

This stuff is OLD, and Jow Wilson has been outed on every bit of that article as being a liar. Check the report for the Senate investigation.

The facts are out there if you check into them. And they support Wilsom being a liar, and his wife just being a desk bound agent after Alrich Ames blew her cover back in *1997*. She was NOT a covert. This is the Old-Boy network at the CIA at work: trying to cast the blame for the results of of poor management and fieldcraft on someone else - in this case trying to blame a "leaker" for sooomethign that was not a leak to begin with.

It can hardly be a leak if the info was not classified to begin with.

Its akin to trying to prosecute someone for leaking a US Army Field Manual that they bought off ebay which turned out to be UNCLASSIFIED.

The special counsel is trying his damnest to dig up something to justify his office's continued existence, in hopes of becoming a special prosecutor, not just a counsel.

Sadly for him, and for the left, there simply is no "there" there for them.

The ONLY reason this is a headline event is that the openly partisan press has decided to help thier side by trying to make something of nothing, in order to try to weaken the Republicans before the supreme court noiminations come up.

They are that desperate - and that out of touch, and that bought in by a pack of lies. Just look back to the Dan Rather forged memo if you want to see the truth of thier inability to handle the truth when it doesnt fit their warped views.

Its sad - the "4th branch" of the US has become corrupt and partisan.

Its pretty sad how the more Democrat/left the press has become, the further it leaves behind facts, reason, honesty and fairness, and how much more it relies on lies, rumors, innuendo, smearing, and sensationalism.
Posted by: OldSpook   2005-07-14 09:49  

#9  Isn't MS a Kennedy Konspiracy Kook?
Posted by: eLarson   2005-07-14 09:47  

#8  Sorry Mike S, that post doenst help you a bit - That was Wilsons BACKTRACK, not his original pack of lies that was published in the NYT.

In other words, you are being disingenuous at best, covering for a liar by repeating his covers for his lies.

Mikey - you are as much a liar as Joe Wilson when you do that.

At worst you are aiding and abetting political hacks by deliberately spreading disinfomation in the hopes of hiding the truth: the truth that your side has run out of ideas and publicly lies and dissmebles for political power, becuase they no longer have a moral core. It marks you as a liar, and as the sort of scum who should be jailed.
Posted by: OldSpook   2005-07-14 09:32  

#7  Mike, in the special olympics, you rule!
Posted by: 2b   2005-07-14 09:31  

#6  Wilson better worry if MS is defending him. Look how well that worked for Kofi, Kojo and co-conspirators friends.
Posted by: Mrs. Davis   2005-07-14 09:26  

#5  Thanks for acknowledging my point score, 2b!
Posted by: Mike Sylwester   2005-07-14 09:26  

#4  What's your point, Mike? That he didn't say in this particular piece that Dick Cheney didn't ask him to go? Even if you score a point on this one, how does that change the fact that
1. He was played the fool about the yellowcake sales.
2. He was a partisan hack that was wrong on all accounts
3. That the Dems are being made fools by getting in a hissy fit that Rove warned a reporter with facts that proved true?

Hang your hat on that if you wish - but it's sad and pathetic if that is all you are left with.
Posted by: 2b   2005-07-14 08:31  

#3  Welcome back, welcome back, welcome back.
/kotter
Posted by: Shipman   2005-07-14 08:27  

#2  Wilson wrote in The New York Times: (a) that he, Joseph Wilson, had been dispatched by Dick Cheney to conduct a secret mission to Niger

Here's what Wilson wrote:

In February 2002, I was informed by officials at the Central Intelligence Agency that Vice President Dick Cheney's office had questions about a particular intelligence report. While I never saw the report, I was told that it referred to a memorandum of agreement that documented the sale of uranium yellowcake — a form of lightly processed ore — by Niger to Iraq in the late 1990's. The agency officials asked if I would travel to Niger to check out the story so they could provide a response to the vice president's office.

After consulting with the State Department's African Affairs Bureau (and through it with Barbro Owens-Kirkpatrick, the United States ambassador to Niger), I agreed to make the trip. The mission I undertook was discreet but by no means secret. While the C.I.A. paid my expenses (my time was offered pro bono), I made it abundantly clear to everyone I met that I was acting on behalf of the United States government.
Posted by: Mike Sylwester   2005-07-14 08:26  

#1  of course it was orchestrated by me! You fools. BWAHAAAHAHAHHAHAAAAAAAAAAAA
Posted by: Karl Rove, evil genius   2005-07-14 08:23  

00:00