You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq-Jordan
Gunmen Ambush Two Top Diplomats in Iraq
2005-07-06
Gunmen ambushed two more top diplomats from Muslim countries Tuesday in apparent kidnap bids that seemed aimed at scaring off foreign governments and isolating Iraq from the Arab world.
This is an interesting regression to barbarism that's actually pre-Islamic, maybe even pre-Civilization. Diplomats are occasionally tossed, sometimes even interned, but they're not bumped off. If I remember correctly, Vlad the Impaler did have the hats nailed to the heads of a couple of diplomats who displeased him, but he was kind of an exception to remotely civilized behavior. But then, so is Zarq, so I guess it's understandable from that standpoint...
Pakistan responded by announcing the withdrawal of its ambassador.
"Uncle!"
The attacks, targeting diplomats from Bahrain as well as Pakistan, came three days after gunmen seized Egypt's top envoy to Iraq as he was buying a newspaper in the capital. The Egyptian envoy is still being held. Insurgents were hoping to sow a climate of fear and send a message "to the Arab countries not to open embassies in Iraq and to prevent security, economic and political overtures to Iraq," said Abbas al-Bayati, a member of the parliamentary foreign relations committee.
Obviously that's their current campaign. If we lived in a reasonable world, or even in the world of our fathers, they'd be denounced for the savages they are in every country of the world, to include Swaziland. But we're not, so they won't be. Kofi will bleat, then shut up...
Bahrain's top envoy in Iraq, Hassan Malallah al-Ansari, was slightly wounded as he drove to work in the Mansour district, hospital and Bahraini officials said. Bahraini officials said they believed it was a kidnap attempt. Pakistan's Ambassador Mohammed Younis Khan escaped injury later Tuesday when gunmen in two cars fired on his convoy in a kidnap attack in the same district, security officials said. Both envoys would leave the country temporarily, their governments said after the attacks. "Our escort fired back at them so we were able to escape without any harm," Khan told The Associated Press.
Such things are a lot more common in Karachi, so at least he knew what to do...
A Web statement Tuesday claimed responsibility in the name of al-Qaida in Iraq for the kidnapping of Egyptian diplomat Ihad al-Sherif. It marked the first time the group claimed responsibility for kidnapping a diplomat.
"We're so proud! Our Moms are proud, too!"
Al-Qaida in Iraq, considered one of the most fearsome militant groups in the country, has killed several foreign civilians and contractors that it abducted in the past, often releasing gruesome videos showing their beheadings. The statement made no threat to kill the diplomat and did not present any demands. It could not be verified but was signed "Abu Maysara al-Iraqi," the name used on all claims by al-Qaida in Iraq. Two Russian Embassy cars came under fire on the Baghdad airport road Sunday, the Interfax news agency reported in Moscow. Interfax quoted Foreign Ministry spokesman Alexander Yakovenko as saying the gunfire "was not aimed specifically at the Russian Embassy cars, but was scattered."
Posted by:Fred

#8  if the sultan of kharizmi hadn't killed the mongol's ambassadors who offered trade and good relations [after vassal submission]then who know's--ghengis might never hav marched on islam and his grandson hulegu not destroyed the abbasid caliphate--don't fuck with asian nomads
Posted by: SON OF TOLUI   2005-07-06 17:13  

#7  It's the olde confuse the google bot with highlite trick.
Posted by: Shiipman   2005-07-06 16:01  

#6  

Hulegu Khan is also a hero. He knew how to take on the Muslim empire of his day. Sacking the Caliphate HQ of
Baghdad and wasting the Muhammedan assassin cult. What's not to like?


And that Vlad was also a real kidder. He knew how to terrify the Ottoman Turks into turning tail and retreating


http://www.ucs.mun.ca/~emiller/VladT.htm


"He [the Sultan] marched on for about five kilometers when he saw his
men impaled; the Sultan's
army came across a field with stakes, about three kilometers long and one
kilometer wide. And there were large stakes on which they could see the impaled
bodies of men, women, and children, about twenty thousand of them, as they said;
quite a spectacle for the Turks and the Sultan himself! The Sultan, in wonder,
kept saying that he could not conquer the country of a man who could do such
terrible and unnatural things, and put his power and his subjects to such use.
He also used to say that this man who did such things would be worthy of more.
And the other Turks, seeing so many people impaled,
were scared out of their wits. There were babies clinging to their mothers on
the stakes, and birds had made nests in their breasts."


The Sultan withdrew. But the war was not over. Mehmed threw his support
behind Vlad's brother
Radu, who with the support of defecting boyars and Turkish soldiers, pursued Vlad
all the way to his mountain fortress at Poenari. According to oral legends that
survive to this day in the village of Aref, near the fortress, Vlad
was able to escape into Transylvania with the help of local villagers. But he
was soon arrested near Brasov by Matthias Corvinus, who had chosen to throw his
support behind Radu, Vlad's
successor. Corvinus used as evidence letters supposedly written by Vlad
that indicated he was a traitor to the Christian cause and was plotting to
support the Turks; Romanian historians concur that these letters were forgeries
and part of a larger campaign to discredit Vlad
and justify Corvinus's actions.






Posted by: sameasiteverwas   2005-07-06 11:30  

#5  Hulegu Khan is also a hero. He knew how to take on the Muslim empire of his day. Sacking the Caliphate HQ of Baghdad and wasting the Muhammedan assassin cult. What's not to like?
Posted by: sameasiteverwas   2005-07-06 11:23  

#4  "Kill People", that's their plan.

All the more reason to take no captives and kill the bastards anywhere they are found.
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2005-07-06 10:10  

#3  We need to return to the basics. The ruler of Kwarizm killed a couple of ambassadors from a far off realm. He thought he could get away with it. Ghengis Khan proved him wrong, utterly destroying his empire and killing most of its people.
Posted by: Jackal   2005-07-06 10:00  

#2  Sounds like the new Iranian President (who is behind and supports the terrorists) is getting a head start on his policies --- Attacking diplomats, holding them hostage, taking embassies. Same old tricks.

I wonder if he thinks that Bush == Carter.....
Posted by: CrazyFool   2005-07-06 09:06  

#1  This is an interesting new technique, they tried attacking U.S. Troops, that didn't work, they tried attacking Iraqi troops, that isn't working so good any more, they tried attacking civilians, works good but they dislike you, now they are on to diplomats.
Well, when these butt dumplings figure out what they want they should let us know, because I don't see any ryme or reason to their insurgency at all. The best way to get us out is to get their govt. operating so we will leave. They still don't have the slightest idea of their political goals or their long term mission. "Kill People", that's their plan.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2005-07-06 08:57  

00:00