You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Africa: Subsaharan
Aid Workers Welcome U.S. Pledge to Africa
2005-07-01
Humanitarian workers welcomed President Bush's promise Thursday to double aid to Africa over the next five years, but analysts cautioned that money alone won't solve the continent's woes.
I'd say about a year of careful study and analysis, followed by another year of roving hunter-killer teams should do it. Rinse and repeat as necessary...
Good governance by African leaders and fair trade policies with the impoverished continent are also key, analysts said.
That's why I made my humble suggestion. If it's dependant on the non-existent, somebody has to bring it into existence...
"You have to create the right environment in which aid can get a foothold to make a difference," said Greg Mills, director of the South African Institute of International Affairs.
See? He agrees with me...
The World Health Organization said a proposed $1.2 billion initiative to fight malaria in Africa would contribute greatly to the international goal of cutting malaria deaths in half by 2010. The disease is one of the top killers in Africa, accounting for more than 1 million deaths every year, most of them children. British Prime Minister Tony Blair has been pressing for a generous package of aid, debt relief and trade reform to help impoverished African nations at next week's summit of leaders from the Group of Eight richest countries in Scotland. The United States is the largest single provider of economic aid to Africa, but critics contend it is not doing enough because it has given a lower percentage of its gross domestic product in aid than other major industrialized countries.
It's never enough, is it? We could give everything we have, and it wouldn't be enough. With only one or two exceptions, Africa is a wealth consumer, not a wealth producer.
Posted by:Fred

#11  I hope you're right James. If someone can show me something that works on a continuing basis once the initial dollar/labor inputs have ceased then I will gladly pony up my mite. Maybe 3 mites.
Posted by: Shipman   2005-07-01 16:29  

#10  Certainly money alone won't solve anything. Nor will "projects" alone, such as building a hospital there aren't enough nurses in the country to staff, or building a market shelter miles from where people actually congregate to buy and sell. In between the thieves and the fatheads it is a wonder anything useful ever gets done.

Sometimes things do work, though most of the stories I've heard have been of groups without big pots of cash spending the time to find out what's actually needed and whether solution X will be sustainable.

Posted by: James   2005-07-01 14:54  

#9  What about the accompanying rats, Steve? ;-)
Posted by: .com   2005-07-01 14:49  

#8  Oh, sure, everyone is all smiles at the prospect of more free yankee dollars. Just wait 'til they find out part of the pledge involves Marines sewing ZimBob into a sack and tossing him into the nearest river.
Posted by: SteveS   2005-07-01 14:18  

#7  Good governance by African leaders... are also key, analysts said.

Yeah, well if that's one of the prerequisites, our great, great, great, great grandchildren will be reading this same news story in 3006.
Posted by: tu3031   2005-07-01 12:40  

#6  Humanitarian workers welcomed President Bush's promise Thursday to double aid to Africa over the next five years

"We'll still hate you, though. Now get out, and wipe that spit off your cheek."
Posted by: BH   2005-07-01 10:15  

#5  Good governance by African leaders and fair trade policies with the impoverished continent are also key, analysts said.

Between this article and the one on Mugabe, somebody's PR department is pushing this "fair trade issue" within all of these articles. Must be a vote coming up somewhere. Or maybe it's what we got in exchange for the money. Anyone know?
Posted by: 2b   2005-07-01 07:18  

#4  Well said, AP. And even though we give less %-wise, we give more BY FAR in terms of real moolah. I'm sick and tired of all these NGOs whining and complaining about us. Why don't we withdraw all of our aid and see how they whine then (they're not going to like us either way, so we may as well take care of the ol' homestead).
Posted by: BA   2005-07-01 07:14  

#3  Africa is the economic and social equivalent of an astronomical black hole. It sucks up everything, which goes into a void and comes out in another dimension.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2005-07-01 03:06  

#2  ..but critics contend it is not doing enough because it has given a lower percentage of its gross domestic product in aid than other major industrialized countries.

Quite frankly, these "critics" can all GO TO HELL. It's very easy for some idiots to criticize the amount of a contribution in terms of economic output when IT'S NOT THEIR MONEY THAT'S BEING POURED INTO A BOTTOMLESS PIT.
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2005-07-01 01:20  

#1  Where is sanity?
Posted by: .com   2005-07-01 01:07  

00:00