You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Southeast Asia
Report Says Tsunami Hit the Poor Harder
2005-06-25
LONDON (AP) - Last year's Asian tsunami hit poor people far harder than the middle class and wealthy, and the aid effort could worsen the income gap between the rich and the poor in affected regions, a major aid group warned Saturday. Nearly six months after the enormous Dec. 26 disaster, Oxfam said those aiding the survivors must work hard to reach out to the poor and help them build better lives than they had before.

Just replacing the destroyed assets of landowners and businesspeople would leave behind those who owned little and exacerbate the divide between rich and poor, the agency said. "Desperately poor people have been made poorer still by the tsunami," said Oxfam's Britain director, Barbara Stocking.

Poor people's wooden homes were more likely to be ruined than wealthier victims' brick and stone ones, the agency said. Many poor homeowners have been unable to get compensation for destroyed abodes because they had no deeds. And those who rented informally were often left with nowhere to live, Oxfam said. "These people were already more vulnerable to such disasters because they didn't have any assets, they didn't have insurance, they didn't have any alternate incomes, they didn't have savings ... so when the tsunami came it washed away everything," Cox said.

While many fishermen are getting help in buying new boats and equipment, poor Indians who worked at salt pans that silted over had to move and search for scarce jobs, Oxfam said.
In Sri Lanka, those with businesses that were not registered with the government are finding it harder to access help than more established traders, it reported. Indonesians who worked at ruined small prawn and fish ponds now have no way to make a living, Oxfam said.
Posted by:Steve White

#7  Yes John, Fashion Catastrophes rarely affect (effect?) the poor.
Posted by: Shipman   2005-06-25 15:59  

#6  Is there any kind of natural disaster that does NOT hit the poor harder?

Posted by: john   2005-06-25 15:44  

#5  More money will not really fix the problem. The big enemies are ignorance and corruption. No matter how much money is poured down the hole, it will not go to fixing the real problem.

Prosperous and free societies will take some of their money and spend it on such inane and boring things like tsunami warning systems, creating and enforcing building codes, codifying and implementing good sanitation practices, etc. etc.

Places like Sri Lanka and Indonesia that piss away their wealth and energy on internal conflict will always have a significant percentage of poor people that will be subject to the whims of nature without being prepared.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2005-06-25 15:08  

#4  "Report Says Tsunami Hit the Poor Harder"

In other news, water is wet.

How much did this "report" cost Oxfam? 'Cause I could have written it for half the price, without leaving home, and come to the same conclusion.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2005-06-25 11:39  

#3  How much did we pay for The Oracle to dispense such wisdom?
Posted by: 2b   2005-06-25 06:57  

#2  Good point, Jackal. I guess you have to have a grip on reality for the humor / absurdity to be apparent. Once that's gone, well, with a straight face...
Posted by: .com   2005-06-25 01:00  

#1  It was always a joke in the 80s and 90s about the various papers headlining the end of the world, with the NYT proclaiming "World to end. Poor and minorities hardest hurt."

There is no behavior so inane that the MSM won't do it.
Posted by: Jackal   2005-06-25 00:25  

00:00