You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq-Jordan
JSTARS and Tracking Terrorists in Iraq
2005-06-23
June 23, 2005: U.S. Air Force JSTARS radar aircraft are being used to track down terrorist bombers in Iraq. The U.S. Department of Defense demanded that all the services get to work on dealing with terrorist bombers in Iraq, and the air force responded by suggesting that the JSTARS be used to track down the bases of terrorist bombers. This is done by using the JSTARS radar to track where the attackers go after an attack. Many of the attacks take place in sparely populated places, and at night. JSTARS can track vehicles on the ground over a wide area. For example, a single JSTARS can cover all of central Iraq, although its ground radar can only track a smaller area. The JSTARS radar has two modes; wide area (showing a 25 by 20 kilometer area) and detailed (4,000 by 5,000 meters). The radar can see out to several hundred kilometers and each screen full of information could be saved and brought back later to compare to another view (to see what has moved). In this manner, operators could track movement of ground units over a wide area. Operators could also use the detail mode to pick out specific details of what's going on down there, like tracking the movement of vehicles fleeing the scene of an ambush. JSTARS is real good at picking up trucks moving along highways on flat terrain. JSTARS can stay up there for over 12 hours at a time, and two or more JSTARS can operate in shifts to provide 24/7 coverage. There has always been at least one JSTARS operating in Iraq.

In its new role, JSTARS will operate as part of an intelligence team tracking down the hideouts of terrorist bombers. Israeli advisors have pointed out that if you can get to the planners of these attacks, and the technicians that build the bombs, you can greatly reduce the number of bomb attacks. So now, when a bomb goes off, the unit that is hit, as is customary, reports the attack. Quick reaction forces rush to the scene. But the terrorists know this, and usually only fire on the convoy for a short while before getting into their vehicles and speeding off. Many are caught by helicopters that either escort convoys, or patrol the area waiting for an attack to happen. U.S. helicopter gunships have excellent night vision equipment, and if they can get to the scene quickly enough, they can see the attackers, and kill them. Once the gunships have spotted you, you can run, but you cannot get away. Even if the attackers have fled before the gunships show up, they can start sweeping the area for vehicles moving away, and call in ground troops or, increasingly, Iraqi police, who can stop and search vehicles moving away in the area. If it's a particularly isolated area, there won't be many vehicles moving around.

But with a JSTARS up there, the ground radar is monitoring the area within minutes, if not already. This makes it possible for JSTARS to operate in cooperation with other units to track the terrorists to their bases. The intelligence troops has compiled a lot of data on how the terrorists, and especially the bombers, operate. Using that information in conjunction with JSTARS, and other airborne sensors (gunships, UAVs), it's believed that many of the bombing organizations can be taken out. The intel people already know that there are only a few bomber organizations operating in Iraq. That much can be deduced by the vast amount of detail compiled by the CSI (Crime Scene Investigation) teams that scrutinize each attack. Using JSTARS, and tighter integration of all the intel, reconnaissance and combat units, may be what it takes to track down the bomber workshops, and destroy the organizations. It worked for the Israelis, who basically shut down the terrorist bombing campaign of the Palestinian terrorists.
Posted by:Steve

#6  All a JSTARS would have to do is assign a tracking number to every vehicle it's looking at and then, well, track them. If vehicle number 3,975 (or whatever) speeds off after a bombing then you track that one very closely.
Posted by: Parabellum   2005-06-23 18:53  

#5  Moose, everytime I read one of these reports, I ask myself how are they trying to misdirect? Let's say for the sake of argument that you could identify a vehicle's thermal signature moreorless. Would that make tracing the vehicle back to its point of origin easier?
Posted by: phil_b   2005-06-23 17:53  

#4  OK if you have a SINGLE vehicle fleeing a ALREADY exploded IED then JSTARS becomes useful. But what if there are 100s or 1000s of vehicles on a major highway? JSTARS becomes a very expensive traffic monitoring device. FYI AWACS already provides tracking on ground targets. So we have a duplicity of effort for maybe marginal gain of information. No I was never a fan of big expensive and mostly useless weapons systems.
Posted by: Cyber Sarge   2005-06-23 14:56  

#3  Sounds like they set up a really powerful committee.
Posted by: Shipman   2005-06-23 13:14  

#2  Boy, does this ignore the obvious. For two decades now, we have had the capability to monitor literally every vehicle in a major metropolitan area, simultaneously. So if you record this data, you discover something far more useful then where they go after the bombing. You discover where they *came from*.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2005-06-23 11:01  

#1  Looking forward to the video showing the movements across the Syrian-Iraq border and the trace back to staging areas in Syria. Should be enough for the briefing when Condi or GWB announce ... "the authorization of tactical and operational commanders to engage in hot pursuit of enemy forces in contact and to engage and if necessary destroy any military formations which obstruct such pursuits."
Posted by: Choth Slaick3903   2005-06-23 10:00  

00:00