You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Down Under
Kyoto forests row erupts (in New Zealand)
2005-06-14
More unintended consequences from Kyoto. Carbon credits are intended to promote replanting of forests. However, they are resulting in forests being cut down at an unprecedented rate in New Zealand and in all likelyhood in many other places as Kyoto mandates the same regime in all signatories.
Convenor of the Ministerial Group on Climate Change, Pete Hodgson, lashed out today at forest industry claims made over the past few days that government policies were leading to the destruction of forests needed to mitigate the cost of Kyoto compliance.

The original claims, made last week, came from Forest Owners Association (FOA) president Peter Berg, who said government policies were leading to the rapid conversion of forests to dairy and other purposes.

Mr Berg said the average new rate of new forest planting for the last 30 years has been 44,900 hectares a year. In 2002, it dropped to 22,000 ha and last year to 10,600 ha, with forward orders placed at tree nurseries indicating a further decline this year.

Meanwhile, the gap between the area harvested and area replanted has grown, with increasing areas of harvested forest being converted to dairying and other livestock.

If this trend continues, Mr Berg said, "New Zealand won't have the 33 million tonnes of surplus carbon dioxide credits the government hopes to trade on international markets."

Then, today, Mr Berg said that government policy was triggering deforestation because of "the liability forest owners potentially face if, after harvest, they don't replant forests originally planted before 1990. This could be paying up to $25,000 a hectare."
Posted by:phil_b

#9  New Zealand has gotten their Govt more f*cked up in a given time than any other nation on earth. That's multilateralism for ya, they rush to approve the Kyoto so much nobody even read the thing from front to back.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2005-06-14 11:47  

#8  so Haiti's wayyyyyy ahead in the deforestation game
Posted by: Frank G   2005-06-14 10:20  

#7  they cut most of their trees down along time ago and are only now getting patches of them replanted, its still pretty patchy though, not at all like the western USA
Posted by: bk   2005-06-14 09:57  

#6  Why the New Zealanders are waiting for their government to take care of things is beyond me.
Because, sadly, that's what you do in a socialized state.
Posted by: Steve   2005-06-14 08:20  

#5  ...Can you say, "the law of unintended consquences'? I knew you could.

Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2005-06-14 07:25  

#4  Sorry. The Israel link is www.jnf.org. In my enthusiasm I managed to miss the single quotes that add the Rantburg address to it.
Posted by: trailing wife   2005-06-14 05:02  

#3  Plant trees in Israel and in the U.S. Or organize something on your own -- when we lived in Germany, the local American Women's Club spent a lovely Saturday planting trees on a nearby capped-off garbage dump. Why the New Zealanders are waiting for their government to take care of things is beyond me.
Posted by: trailing wife   2005-06-14 05:00  

#2  "33 million tonnes of surplus carbon dioxide credits"

This gives me the same gobsmacked feeling I got when I first read there was going to be trading in stock index futures.

There is no there, there.

Hey, might as well bet on the rise & fall of the odds of catching farts and painting them green.

Hmmm. Come to think of it, that's exactly what they're doing.
Posted by: .com   2005-06-14 02:35  

#1  Maybe they should plant rubber trees and everything will bounce back into place!
Posted by: Shomble Shoger7533   2005-06-14 02:12  

00:00