You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan/South Asia
Human Rights Watch Urges United States to Respect Al-Libbi's Rights
2005-06-07
An international human rights group urged Washington to respect the rights of a senior al-Qaida suspect arrested in Pakistan as the American military confirmed he had been transferred to U.S. custody and flown to the United States. Abu Farraj al-Libbi, who is accused of masterminding two assassination attempts against Pakistan's President Gen. Pervez Musharraf, was captured after a shootout with Pakistani agents in the country's northwest on May 2. Col. James Yonts, the U.S. military spokesman in neighboring Afghanistan, said in an e-mail to The Associated Press that al-Libbi was taken from Pakistan to the United States and was not brought to Afghanistan. He gave no other details.
"I can say no more"

It was unclear what charges, if any, al-Libbi might face in the United States. A Pakistani security official said al-Libbi would be taken to a U.S. detention facility where other al-Qaida suspects are being held. He declined to say whether al-Libbi would be taken to Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, where many other suspected al-Qaida members are detained.
Gitmo is for small fry. I still vote for Diego Garcia, unless there's another, more remote camp.
The security official, who was involved in the deportation process, was not authorized to speak on the record.
Human Rights Watch called on the United States to respect al-Libbi's rights. "He must be treated in accordance with U.S. and international law, not 'disappeared' or tortured like so many other terror suspects," Reed Brody, legal counsel for the group, said.
Fine, we'll give him his choice as to what he wants for his last meal.
Ummm... What's the phrase I'm looking for?... Oh, yes. "Piss off!"
Some officials have described al-Libbi as al-Qaida's No. 3 leader, after Osama bin Laden and Egyptian surgeon Ayman al-Zawahri. However, he does not appear on the FBI list of the world's most-wanted terrorists and his exact role in al-Qaida is murky. Officials have accused Al-Libbi, who is Libyan, of masterminding two bombings that narrowly missed Musharraf in December 2003 and a suicide attack aimed at Prime Minister Shaukat Aziz in July 2004. Neither leader was hurt, but 26 people died in the attacks.
Posted by:Steve

#11  Sorry, HRW, the operative word is "human" where sub-humans don't qualify.

Where's Hannibal Lecter when you need him?
Posted by: Captain America   2005-06-07 22:59  

#10  CrazyFool----may I name my next child in your honor? That is simply .. . there are no words for the profundity of your statement.
Posted by: Jame_Retief   2005-06-07 22:48  

#9  I vote we do exactly what HRW wants and follow the Geneva Convention to the letter.

And shoot Mr. Al-Libbi in the head.

He is an unlawful combatant and therefore can be shot indiscriminately.

In fact we almost *must* execute him or no other country will respect the Geneva Convention when it comes to our soldiers who are prisoners -- why should they??
Posted by: CrazyFool   2005-06-07 17:23  

#8  I vote Diego Garcia
Posted by: Frank G   2005-06-07 16:51  

#7  Glad to see HRW has Darfur & Cuba all solved, so they can deal with big problems like protecting a guy who plotted to kill a head of state....twice.

Wasn't there supposed to be some prison on an Aleutian island, or did the guvmint decide that was too cruel for the native fauna?
Posted by: Desert Blondie   2005-06-07 16:40  

#6  HRW has no respect for my "human rights" therefore I have no respect for HRW or it's members, To dumb to be scumb.

al-Libbi gets 3 hots and clean cot and clothing, much more that he and his ilk give anyone they have taken prisoner.

A bullet to the back of the head as soon as we drain his brain of every bit of information we can get is what he has coming. That's not wht he will get however.
Posted by: Sock Puppet 0’ Doom   2005-06-07 16:12  

#5  And if by some chance Mr. Libbi's head did become detached, it would not be placed at the foot of the bed of anyone from Human Rights Watch.
Posted by: Matt   2005-06-07 16:04  

#4  I think HRW can rest assured that Uncle Sam won't cut his head off with a dull machete.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2005-06-07 15:53  

#3  These "human rights" ativists care more about < 600
detainees that the whole rest of the U.S, British, and European population. That guy has information inside him that could save many lives, what would you do for 600million people's safety? The good of the many outweighs the good of the few, or the one.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2005-06-07 15:49  

#2  yes. respect his rights as much as he respected the rights of others.

I'm all for that.
Posted by: PlanetDan   2005-06-07 15:48  

#1  He has no rights.

And plenty of wrongs.

All the "international human rights" groups - who NEVER ACTUALLY DID ANYTHING TO SECURE ANYONE'S HUMAN RIGHTS and in any event don't think anyone has any rights if they're (a) black or (b) not in permanent kill-Americans mode - can FOAD.

These clowns give new meaning to the term clueless assholes. :-(
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2005-06-07 15:43  

00:00