You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Europe
Historians Uncover Drawing For Hitler's Nuke
2005-06-03

The only known German diagram of a nuclear weapon. The diagram, which has never been published before, is schematic and is far removed from a practical blueprint for an atomic bomb. It was discovered by one of us (RK) earlier this year in a report written shortly after the Second World War by an unnamed German or Austrian scientist. Although the weapon is shown to be a fission device based on plutonium, the report also reveals that German scientists had worked intensively on the theory of a hydrogen bomb.

A pair of German and US historians said Wednesday they had found the only known diagram for the nuclear bomb that Nazi scientists strived to build during World War II. The rough schematic does not imply that the Nazis built or even were close to building a nuclear bomb, but it shows they had progressed farther toward that goal than is conventionally thought, they said.

The 60-year-old document is part of a report that appears to have been produced just after the end of the war in Europe in May 1945 and describes the work on nuclear weapons that had been carried out during the conflict. The report is undated and in addition lacks a title page, which means its author or authors cannot be identified. It came from a "private archive," the historians said.

In addition to the rough plan for a bomb, the Nazi report estimates, comparatively accurately, that a plutonium warhead of just over five kilospounds) was needed to achieve critical mass -- the chain reaction that leads to a nuclear blast.

The historians are Rainer Karlsch, an independent historian based in Berlin, and Mark Walker of Union College, Schenectady, New York state. Karlsch stirred controversy earlier this year when he published a book in Germany, "Hitlers Bombe," in which he claimed that the Nazis had successfully tested a primitive nuclear device in the last days of World War II as Allied troops were closing in on both sides. The device, tested in Thuringia, eastern Germany, killed several hundred prisoners of war and concentration camp inmates, the book said.

That assertion was scoffed at by other historians, who said that by the end of the war, the Nazis still did not understand some of the physics of chain reaction. The knowledge gaps include the way in which fast neutrons emitted by plutonium or uranium-235 atoms trigger further fission reactions. This ignorance in turn caused the Nazi scientists to grossly over-estimate the amount of nuclear material needed to achieve critical mass, according to the critics' view.

Karlsch and Walker rebut this, saying that new sources of historical material, such as documents squirrelled away in Russian archives, are trickling out, showing that the Nazis were farther down the road to acquiring nuclear capability than was thought.

Germany's "uranium project" was launched in 1939 to investigate nuclear reactors, isotope separation and nuclear explosives. Unlike the US-led Manhattan Project, which harnessed thousands of people and several billion dollars to devise the bombs that were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945, the German effort amounted to no more than a few dozen scattered scientists.

Scientific files seized after the war, and bugged conversations of 10 German nuclear scientists held in a British prison camp in 1945, forged the conventional belief, prevailing today, that even though Hitler craved a nuclear bomb, he was still months or more likely years from ever getting one.

More Info HERE
Posted by:Spavirt Pheng6042

#16  Now for something a little sobering.

Rent or buy the film "Patton." Look for all the news reels commentaries. You hear the word Americans only once of dozens of references. Instead you hear the words "Allies" or "Allied" in lieu of the proper description American.

The MSM then were likely cowed into going along but by no means loyal, in my opinion.
Posted by: badanov   2005-06-03 21:26  

#15  available now for $12.95 on Amazon....
Posted by: Frank G   2005-06-03 21:15  

#14  Recommended reading:

Skis Against the Atom, by Knut Haukelid. Account of the commando raid on the Norske Hydro heavy water plant in Vemork. Haukelid was there.

You'll have to root around in the Library Stacks for it, or else write to Little Norway museum in Blue Mound, WI
Posted by: mom   2005-06-03 21:08  

#13  
How Close Was Hitler to the A-Bomb?
Posted by: john   2005-06-03 21:08  

#12  ....Guys, I am NOT an expert on nuclear weapons - conventional airmunitions were my career - but for a lot of reasons, this didn't smell right. A Gentleman of My Aqcuaintance who is a specialist in this field, however, has made a few points:
For starters, the design would seem to show that this is a gun-type bomb - where a slug of Uranium is fired into a larger receptacle of uranium, starting the explosion process. But the bomb shown here uses plutonium - which is used for implosion weapons, a completely different type and design. (Note that there also appears to be no way for the slug to enter the sphere at the front of the design). Second, the shape of the slug is wrong - it is flat at both ends - there's no reason for the needless complication of it being aerodynamic. Third, the bomb is labeled 'Uranium Bomb Mark I' - but the material inside, again, is plutonium.

Mike
Posted by: Whotch Hupath2673   2005-06-03 20:54  

#11  What was this fission fusion device they tested?
Did it go boom, fizz or what?
Posted by: 3dc   2005-06-03 20:35  

#10  You're on a major roll, TGA.
Posted by: Matt   2005-06-03 14:44  

#9  Roosevelt lied, Nazis died!
Posted by: True German Ally   2005-06-03 14:24  

#8  Here's the full-size image. Can anyone read the label on the purple thing on the upper half of the drawing? If that's meant to be fissile material, too, it looks a bit as if they're trying to make a gun-type weapon with plutonium.
Posted by: Angie Schultz   2005-06-03 13:45  

#7  The Germans and Italians declared war on the US on 11 December 1941.

Oh, and don't forget the heavy water plant in Norway, which was part of the German bomb program.
http://www.pafko.com/trips/norway/n10/
Posted by: Thinert Phineck9788   2005-06-03 09:19  

#6  He then used the excuse of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor to go to war with Germany.

I think he used the "excuse" of Germany declaring war on us to go to war with Germany.
Posted by: VAMark   2005-06-03 08:51  

#5  So true, MSM, so true! You and A.I. keep flocking together, eh, while the rest of us 'mericans t.c.o.b.
Posted by: BA   2005-06-03 08:49  

#4  BAH! (waves hand)

Brutal Smutal! Nobody had panties on their heads so we didn't care.
Posted by: MainStreamMedia   2005-06-03 08:42  

#3  I, for one, am completely glad that the MSM was on our side in WWII. You forgot to add though, that after the war we uncovered how brutal Saddam Hitler was to certain ethnic/religious groups. Man, the similarities are eerie, eh?
Posted by: BA   2005-06-03 08:35  

#2  Fine points DMFD!
Posted by: Shipman   2005-06-03 08:28  

#1  Roosevelt spent $2 billion dollars (1940's dollars) on the Manhattan project based on reports of German WMD's. Other than this recently discovered drawing, there was little evidence found of these WMD's. He then used the excuse of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor to go to war with Germany. There was never any proof that Germany was involved in the Pearl Harbor attack!

Aren't you glad the MSM was on our side in WWII
Posted by: DMFD   2005-06-03 08:19  

00:00