You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia
Caspian oil set for fast flow to the West
2005-05-06
As growing concerns about dwindling global reserves help maintain oil prices close to the $50 a barrel mark, a major supply route linking newly developed oil and gas fields in the Caspian Sea with western markets is due to be opened. The pipeline is expected to spark an economic boom in Baku

Within the next few weeks, oil from the Caspian will start flowing into a 1,762 kilometres long pipeline. The pipeline will run from Baku, the capital of Azerbaijan, via near Tbilisi, the capital of Georgia, and across eastern Turkey to the port of Ceyhan, on Turkey's Mediterranean coast.

The Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) pipeline is being built by a consortium of companies led by energy giant BP. The project, costing an estimated $3.6bn (£1.9bn), is described by BP as the world's biggest energy scheme. "Building work is generally progressing on schedule," says a BP spokesperson in Baku. "We expect to be loading tankers in Ceyhan with Caspian crude before the end of the year."

The pipeline project is highly controversial. Governments involved have welcomed the project. "The whole region needs this pipeline," says Ilham Aliyev, Azerbaijan's president.

However, from long before work started on the pipeline in early 2003, concerns were raised about running it through such a volatile political region. In Azerbaijan, the pipeline goes close to the ceasefire line separating the forces of Azerbaijan and Armenia, its neighbour and bitter enemy to the west. The two countries are locked in a bloody territorial dispute and, despite the ceasefire, clashes often occur.

Elsewhere en-route, concern has been raised about the pipeline's vulnerability to attack from anti government groups. Georgia battles various separatist conflicts, while in Turkey the pipeline skirts the heartlands of Kurdish areas. "We have secured the pipeline to the highest standards," insists Tamam Bayatly, BP's communications manager in Baku.

Non-governmental organisations have complained.
Well yeah, of course they did.
Some about human rights being abused, others about the pipeline's environmental impact. Green groups question the presence of such a project in what is a highly active seismic zone, saying any rupture of the pipeline would cause widespread damage. In Georgia in particular there have been strong protests about the pipeline's route through the Borjomi Valley, one of the country's most scenic areas and a centre of tourism.

"I cannot say that there are not any problems," says Faig Askerov, who monitors the environmental impact of the project for BP. "We use technology that makes the minimum impact on the environment. We are not ideal, but we're good."

Western governments and financial institutions have given strong backing to the project. The United States has given significant political support, seeing the pipeline as a way of transporting vital energy supplies out of the Caspian, avoiding alternative routes to the south through Iran, or to the north through Russia.

But Russia has been unhappy with the project, seeing it as further evidence of the West seeking to exert power and influence in an area Moscow has traditionally seen as its own backyard.
Posted by:Steve White

#5  and a centre of tourism
...for saudi tourists, syrian tourists, yemeni tourists, pakistani tourists....
Posted by: Steve   2005-05-06 8:28:40 AM  

#4  LOL, Ship! And the Beeb probably thinks the area around Chernobyl is REALLY a ''scenic area'' because NO ONE'S there now, but nature has reasserted herself in the area (just don't eat the pine nuts from around there).
Posted by: BA   2005-05-06 08:18  

#3  Georgia in particular there have been strong protests about the pipeline's route through the Borjomi Valley, one of the country's most scenic areas and a centre of tourism.

Who knew? Live and lern.
Posted by: Shipman   2005-05-06 07:31  

#2  Heh. Spot-on, phil_b. Much of what follows is just more hand-wringing wanking in agenda-land.

It's always rather comical to me that the agenda-driven folks are foolish enough to believe that their idea of right and wrong is universally held - and only the means and the players are in need of exposure and debate. Nah, Beeb, you're blinded by your own BS.

The pipeline is being built because the price is high enough to cover the costs and increase profits over other forms or distribution. That there are risks because of instability is factored in. Economics 101, which everyone at Beeb seems to have failed. Who wants it and who doesn't are predictable points on the political curve - so fucking what, Beeb? Have a nice lie-down, K?
Posted by: .com   2005-05-06 02:58  

#1  As growing concerns about dwindling global reserves Typical of the BBC to start with a statement that is both false and irrelevant. Just gotta take every opportunity to push the agenda. The world's proven reserves of oil continue to increase and the oil price is determined by available supply and not by reserves.
Posted by: phil_b   2005-05-06 02:27  

00:00