You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Africa: North
Two women open fire on tour bus in Cairo
2005-04-30
Two veiled women opened fire on a tour bus in a historic part of the Egyptian capital Saturday and one of them was killed in a gunbattle with security guards, authorities said. Hours earlier, a suspect in an April 7 bomb attack died in a police chase when an explosive he was carrying blew up as he jumped off a bridge. Seven people, including four foreigners, were injured in the explosion, which occurred by a bus station near an exclusive hotel frequented by foreigners and behind the downtown Egyptian Museum. The Interior Ministry said Ehab Yousri Yassin, an Egyptian suspected in the April 7 bombing at a tourist bazaar, was killed after he jumped from the bridge during a pursuit, setting off the explosion he was carrying.
Y'know, I suspect he may have been involved in terrorism. But it's only a suspicion, mind you...
Less than two hours later, two veiled women opened fire at a tour bus in the Sayeda Aisha part of old Cairo, an area rich with historic mosques and cemeteries. Three people, including one woman, were injured and at least one of the attackers was killed, Egyptian Health Minister Mohammed Awad Tag Eddin told reporters. The minister said it was not known if the injured woman was the second shooter.
Not good for the tourism business. Or for Hosni. snip.
I know it'd be un-Islamic, but if they stopped women from wearing those veils, there wouldn't be as many women with moustaches and falsies running around.
Posted by:Mrs. Davis

#9  It's always our fault. Ignorance, folly, brutality, diving into the till, stealing the entire boodle, murder, rape, famine, indigestion and the heartbreak of psoriasis...
Posted by: Fred   2005-04-30 11:16:12 PM  

#8  Folks,

The topic is the Middle East--I believe the term is 'hummous'?
Posted by: JDB   2005-04-30 7:26:08 PM  

#7  "What is wrong with these people?"

They're Muslims.
Posted by: Dave D.   2005-04-30 2:42:48 PM  

#6  Typos, like homorous = humorous, though, are fine with me. ;-)
Posted by: Sobiesky   2005-04-30 2:33:36 PM  

#5  John, I share your sentiment, but not your love for neologisms that do not make, even remotely, any sense or do not introduce some homorous facet in the scheme of things.

While it is certainly a commonly heard word, its usage is considered substandard because the word is illogical. "Regardless" already means "without regard," so when we add the negative prefix "ir-," we create a double negative. In essence, we end up saying "not without regard," which means, of course, "with regard"--the opposite of what we intend.
Posted by: Sobiesky   2005-04-30 2:32:20 PM  

#4  What is wrong with these people?

Do not look for logic and consistency in the Middle East where they are not to be found.

-- Victor Davis Hanson
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2005-04-30 2:04:57 PM  

#3  They seem to find it impossible to comdemn an atrocity without dragging the koran and america/israel into it.

Killing people at random is (a) a crime everywhere in the word (b) against all religious teachings

The attack isn't wrong because Allah said so. It is wrong because killing is wrong. All human socities prohibit this, irregardless of religion, culture etc.

Why can't they just condemn the killing?

What is wrong with these people?

Posted by: john   2005-04-30 12:39:14 PM  

#2  ...but interestingly also "Down with Israel" "Down with America"

Yep, our $2B / yr is really working...
Posted by: Raj   2005-04-30 12:30:03 PM  

#1  In the BBC TV report, a witness said that a crowd gathered, angry at the attack. They shouted "Haram" (implying the attack was forbidden) "Down with terrorism" but interestingly also "Down with Israel" "Down with America" (who have nothing to do with the attack).
Posted by: john   2005-04-30 12:27:50 PM  

00:00