You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Terror Networks & Islam
Arabs starting to notice shift towards democracy
2005-03-16
Two years after US tanks thrust into Iraq to topple Saddam Hussein, the Middle East is no safer but is being swept by political changes challenging a decades-old stalemate of power. The US-led invasion of Iraq on March 20, 2003, triggered two simultaneous and contradictory phenomena in the region, by inviting increased terrorist activity whilst prodding other regimes into taking steps towards democratic reform. The past two years have seen the spread of extremist organisations such as Osama bin Laden's Al-Qaeda network to previously stable countries such as Saudi Arabia or Kuwait.

Many Iraqis, even among those who welcomed the US intervention, now resent the presence of troops, which have failed to bring stability, security and basic services to large swathes of the territory. Bomb attacks, including suicide operations, are a daily occurrence in the troubled country, where both US and Iraqi forces have failed to bring several lawless areas under their control. With the emergence in Iraq of the first Shiite government in 1,000 years and the two most powerful countries in the region being non-Arab Israel and Iran, the old order of a Middle East dominated by Sunni Arabs is becoming a thing of the past.

The reaction of radical Sunni organisations in Iraq and elsewhere is key to the stability of the region. In a recent report, the International Crisis Group argued Washington's hamfisted policies in the region risked radicalising the population and bolstering the Jihadist brand of Islamic activism. But the United States claims that its forceful approach has paid off and cites as the latest example the massive popular movement in Lebanon demanding an end to Syria's 30-year-old occupation.
Posted by:Dan Darling

#3  Lol, you're on a roll .com! I'd love to see their faces if the Israel-Paleostine situation is solved: what do we seethe about now?
Posted by: Spot   2005-03-16 8:23:50 AM  

#2  Why about telling the Arabs:

"Support your Army as long as it shoots its officers."?
Posted by: JFM   2005-03-16 4:00:01 AM  

#1  "...basic Arab grievances..."

Lol! Who GIVES a shit? The Sunnis are the assholes of Saudi Arabia. They are the assholes of Iraq. The Shi'a (the clergy, anyway) are the assholes of Iran. I think the message is becoming clearer - and it's not the one the author wants to illuminate.

In the Arab world, whomever has the power abuses it, works to perfect pure raw arrogance, and proudly becomes pluperfect assholes. Their privilege, if in power. This is why they resent the hell out of America and call us arrogant - they obviously do believe we are, mainly because that's what they'd be, if in our position.

On the grievances thing, well, as usual you're mad at the wrong people and for the wrong reasons. Israel? 95% of you asshats live hundreds of miles from there, never even been to Jerusalem, know any Israelis, detest the Paleos, and a change in their fate will have zero effect upon your lives. It's your own Mullahs, and Kings, and Dictators, and Kleptocracies that have made your lives hopeless, pointless, failures. Got nothing to do with Israel or America - it's all right there at home. Grab a clue, fuckwits.
Posted by: .com   2005-03-16 3:22:42 AM  

00:00