| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Politix |
| Democrats vs. Democrats (The Nation vs. DLC) |
| 2005-03-09 |
| Going Nowhere The DLC Sputters to a Halt by Ari Berman ...The ideological independence of the DLC, which pushed the [democratic] party to the right, has come to be viewed as a threat rather than a virtue, forcing the DLC to adapt accordingly. Corporate fundraisers and DC connections--the lifeblood of the DLC--matter less and less: Witness the ascent of MoveOn.org and Howard Dean's election as chair of the Democratic National Committee (DNC). "It's not that the DLC changed," says Kenneth Baer, who wrote a history of the organization. "It's that the world changed around the DLC." Today's DLC is a far cry from the anti-establishment organization created by New Democrats who captured power within the party in the Clinton era by distancing themselves from the party's traditional base and liberal candidates....The progressive infrastructure that helped keep Kerry alive and began crafting a sharper Democratic message--America Votes, Progressive Majority, Camp Wellstone, Democracy for America, Center for American Progress, Air America Radio, Media Matters, the blogosphere--now exerts a greater degree of influence, bankrolled by new, wealthy outsiders and small donors who share similar goals. George Soros and Peter Lewis have pledged $100 million over the next fifteen years to support a permanent idea factory rivaling right-wing think tanks like the Heritage Foundation and the mushy centrism of the DLC's Progressive Policy Institute. "We've come to represent a way of doing politics that is dangerous to people in DC who have a nice little niche," says MoveOn.org executive director Eli Pariser. "Bringing in the grassroots will mean a loss of influence for some of the establishment folks." [which movie would be more fun to watch.. The PA vs. Hamas or the DLC vs. Deaniacs] |
| Posted by:mhw |
| #8 Aren't Harvard, Yale, Cornell, Michigan, CU, Berkeley, UCLA, Columbia, enough? Looking at their effectiveness, jackal, obviously not. On the other hand, each dollar spent to generate useless ideas is a dollar not interfering with democracy. And it is possible (in the sense that anything with a probability greater than zero is possible) they might come up with something useful to the country. ;-) |
| Posted by: trailing wife 2005-03-09 10:27:54 PM |
| #7 "...pledged $100 million over the next fifteen years to support a permanent idea factory rivaling right-wing think tanks..." Aren't Harvard, Yale, Cornell, Michigan, CU, Berkeley, UCLA, Columbia, enough? |
| Posted by: jackal 2005-03-09 9:52:10 PM |
| #6 The left's equivalent of the 700 Club. |
| Posted by: 2b 2005-03-09 9:08:06 PM |
| #5 A critical flaw in their plan is that they can elect radicals all they want, but they will never have power. Moderates who cooperate with the republicans will rise to the top because they will be able to bring home the pork. Only incredibly stupid and stubborn democrats will continue to back losers forever. |
| Posted by: Anonymoose 2005-03-09 9:01:36 PM |
| #4 |
| Posted by: BigEd 2005-03-09 5:39:58 PM |
| #3 George Soros and Peter Lewis have pledged $100 million over the next fifteen years to support a permanent idea factory rivaling right-wing think tanks like the Heritage Foundation and the mushy centrism of the DLC’s Progressive Policy Institute. It won't matter how many dollars they dump into the thing. The only number in the MSM's Rolodex is "Brookings". |
| Posted by: eLarson 2005-03-09 5:26:04 PM |
| #2 AKA Die Deutsche Russen. |
| Posted by: Raj 2005-03-09 5:23:26 PM |
| #1 Deutsche Demokratische Republik--they were "Democrats", too. Coincidentally, the highest proportion of Neo-nazis comes from its former territory. That is: Neo-NDSAP (National Deutsche Sozialist Arbeit Partei), still called, for some obscure reason, "right-wing". |
| Posted by: twobyfour 2005-03-09 5:18:23 PM |