You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Russia to confirm Iran atom fuel deal - spent fuel 'to be returned to Russ'
2005-02-26
Moscow and Tehran are set to sign a deal over the supply of fuel for Iran's new nuclear reactor in Bushehr. The deal, forcing Iran to return all its spent nuclear fuel to Russia, paves the way for the reactor to start work. Russian atomic energy chief Alexander Rumyantsev is expected to sign the oft-delayed agreement on Saturday.

The US fears Iran could use spent fuel to make weapons but Russia has rejected US pressure to cut nuclear co-operation with Iran, our correspondent reports. At the very least, the US is concerned that the nuclear project could allow for the covert transfer of weapons technology to Iran, according to the BBC's Frances Harrison in Tehran.

At a meeting between President Putin and US President George W Bush in Slovakia on Thursday, both sides agreed Iran should not be allowed to develop nuclear weapons - and Mr Putin said he believed Iran had no intention of doing so. The Russian ambassador in Tehran, Alexander Maryasov, said the signing of the agreement will leave "no grounds to state that Iran may use nuclear fuel for other than peaceful purposes", the Itar-Tass news agency reports.

Mr Rumyantsev is also expected to visit Bushehr to inspect the $800m reactor, built with Russian help. There is already talk of Russia being awarded a contract to build another reactor at the site, our correspondent says.

The signing of the nuclear-fuel deal has been delayed several times in the past over apparent technical and financial issues. According to the AFP news agency, Iran was initially reluctant to agree to Russian demands for all spent fuel to be returned, citing the risks involved in transporting it. But Russia insisted on the guarantee to ensure no spent fuel was diverted for the manufacture of weapons.
Posted by:Bulldog

#2  To Russ? What ifn he's not home? Best to mark it Fergile.
Posted by: Shipman   2005-02-26 2:08:49 PM  

#1  Refresh my memory, but haven't the Russians had a hard time just accounting for their own nuke materials?
Posted by: Elmagum Elmelet3878   2005-02-26 8:59:01 AM  

00:00