You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq-Jordan
Iraqi women no better off post-Saddam - Amnesty
2005-02-21
Other than the couple hundred thousand that Sammy whacked and tossed into mass graves, they mean.
LONDON, Feb 22 (Reuters) - Nearly two years after the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, women there are no better off than under the rule of ousted dictator Saddam Hussein, the human rights group Amnesty International said on Tuesday. In a report entitled "Iraq -- Decades of Suffering," it said that while the systematic repression under Saddam had ended, ...
Oh yeah, that.
... it had been replaced by increased murders, and sexual abuse -- including by U.S. forces.
First hundred words and there it is, evil US forces.
Washington promised that the overthrow of Saddam would free the Iraqi people from years of oppression and set them on the road to democracy. But Amnesty said post-war insecurity had left women at risk of violence and curtailed their freedoms. "The lawlessness and increased killings, abductions and rapes that followed the overthrow of the government of Saddam Hussein have restricted women's freedom of movement and their ability to go to school or to work," Amnesty said.
Not that that corresponds to reality, but keep going.
"Women have been subjected to sexual threats by members of the U.S.-led forces and some women detained by U.S. forces have been sexually abused, possibly raped," it added.
How 'bout turning over any evidence you have on that to the Judge Advocate General? They'll know what to do with it.
Amnesty said several women detained by U.S. troops had spoken in interviews with them of beatings, threats of rape, humiliating treatment and long periods of solitary confinement.
Several.
The Pentagon said it had not seen the report, but took any allegations of detainee abuse seriously. "We have demonstrated our commitment to ensuring that kind of behaviour is identified and dealt with properly," spokesman Lieutenant-Colonel Joe Richard said in Washington. "With this report, we would like the opportunity to review it and to test the validity of the allegations."
Exactly the right response.
Amnesty said women's rights activists and political leaders had also been targeted by armed insurgent groups.
And who might those "armed insurgent groups" be? Any possible clue here that the US is trying to protect wimmin by killing Ba'athists and jihadis?
Women continued to suffer legal discrimination under laws that granted husbands effective impunity to beat their wives and treated so-called "honour" killers leniently, the group said. "Within their own communities, many women and girls remain at risk of death from male relatives if they are accused of behaviour held to have brought dishonour on the family," Amnesty said, noting some attempts by religious zealots to make the laws even more repressive against women.
Sorta like the whole of the Middle East.

Here's the complaint in a nutshell -- it isn't perfect in Iraq today, therefore it's all wrong and we should never had invaded.
But on the positive side, the report said several women's rights groups had been formed -- including ones that focused on the protection of women from violence.
A committee! Awright! Send for the UN!
Amnesty called on the Iraqi authorities and newly elected members of the National Assembly to enshrine the rights of women in the new constitution. This included treating honour killings as murder, outlawing violence within marriage and making sure that the punishment was commensurate with the crime committed.
But even if they do, life still won't be perfect and therefore it was all wrong to remove Sammy, ya know?
Posted by:Steve White

#6  AI is poop. I met a gal from Baghdad shortly after the US takeover and have been keeping in touch with her regularly. She spent her Saddham years in hiding, but has working full-time since things calmed down, and has never been happier in her life. Of course, she is unmarried and educated ... maybe AI is just interested in unhappily married uneducated women.
Posted by: Beau   2005-02-21 10:52:30 PM  

#5  Thats is those women who, because they belonged to the Baas, weren't in danger of being raped or have their children tortured in front of them are not better than under Saddam
Posted by: JFM   2005-02-21 4:55:40 PM  

#4  Well done Mrs D. AI was hijacked by the IslamoLeft years ago. Its a shame because at one time they did good work.
Posted by: phil_b   2005-02-21 4:34:21 PM  

#3  Amnesty International -

Maybe that is who Eason Jordan was talking about

Amnesty International person was lurking around, one of our pilots was given a target where suspected unreformed Ba'athists were hanging out, and the A.I. person ended up flat as Rachael Corrie...

Therefore we were accused of targeting "Journalists"
Posted by: BigEd   2005-02-21 4:05:02 PM  

#2  Brilliant work, Mrs D.

It reminds me of that great Den Beste post about the drunk and the street light.
Posted by: 11A5S   2005-02-21 3:54:54 PM  

#1  Interesting, the report is not available on the AI site.

Also interesting is that the index of articles by country for Iraq shows AI report volume by year of:

1995-0
1996-3
1997-4
1998-10
1999-7
2000-15
2001-14
2002-10
2003-129
2004-55

None of the reports before 2003 concerned women. It doesn't appear AI knows much about the rights of women under Saddam or chose to hide what it knew. Perhaps Eason Jordan could find his next job at AI.
Posted by: Mrs. Davis   2005-02-21 3:52:22 PM  

00:00