| Submit your comments on this article |
| Syria-Lebanon-Iran |
| US lacking HUMINT on Iran |
| 2005-02-10 |
| U.S. intelligence is unlikely to know much about Iran's contentious nuclear program and could be vulnerable to manipulation for political ends, former intelligence officers and other experts say. Amid an escalating war of words between Washington and Tehran, the experts say they doubt the CIA has been able to recruit agents with access to the small circle of clerics who control the Islamic Republic's national security policy. Serious doubts also surround the effectiveness of an expanded intelligence role for the Pentagon, which former intelligence officials say is preparing covert military forays to look for evidence near suspected weapons facilities. "I will be highly remarkably surprised if the United States has (intelligence) assets in the organs of power," said Ray Takeyh, an Iran expert at the Council on Foreign Relations. "They don't even know who the second-tier Revolutionary Guards are," he added. Doubts about U.S. intelligence on Iran have arisen amid talk of possible military strikes by the United States or Israel against suspected nuclear weapons facilities. Former chief weapons inspector David Kay, the first to declare U.S. intelligence on weapons of mass destruction in Iraq a failure, warned that the Bush administration is again relying on evidence from dissidents, as it did in prewar Iraq. "The tendency is to force the intelligence to support the political argument," Kay said in a CNN interview on Wednesday. He added that the CIA has yet to give U.S. policymakers an up-to-date comprehensive intelligence assessment on Iran. "We're talking about military action against Iran and we don't have a national intelligence estimate that shows what we do know, what we don't know and the basis for what we think we know," Kay said. Problems arose for U.S. intelligence in Iran a quarter of a century ago after the Islamic revolution, when Washington cut diplomatic ties following the seizure of the American embassy by student radicals. Richard Perle, the influential neoconservative thinker who was a driving force behind the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, said intelligence suffered a major setback in Iran with the arrest of about 40 agents in the mid-1990s. "As I understand it, virtually our entire network in Iran was wiped out," Perle recently told the House of Representatives intelligence committee. "I think we're in very bad shape in Iran," he said. Some intelligence analysts argue a preemptive strike is the only way to delay Iranian nuclear-weapons production, despite the Bush administration's public emphasis on diplomacy. U.S. intelligence has had a huge credibility problem over reports that prewar Iraq possessed large stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons and was pursuing nuclear arms. The assertions were The task of recruiting useful agents in Iran faces immense hurdles posed by a secretive decision-making hierarchy and widespread mistrust of the U.S. government, experts said. "People have worked their whole lives on the 'Iran problem' and they'll finish their lives with a huge 'A' for effort and probably a 'C' in terms of recruited human sources," said a former senior intelligence official who asked not to be named. Not even covert forays into Iran by U.S. military units would likely bear much fruit, the former official added. "They're never going to find anything out of substance except that there's some mysterious place in the desert with barbed wire and mines around it," he said. |
| Posted by:Dan Darling |
| #9 especially Eason Jordan. As a loyal American he'd never....uh...oh, bad example |
| Posted by: Frank G 2005-02-10 7:34:36 PM |
| #8 Sure... if we *did* have human intel in Iran I'm sure we would take major pains to keep CNN and the other MSM fully informed..... |
| Posted by: CrazyFool 2005-02-10 7:30:51 PM |
| #7 We have plenty. Iranian Americans are allowed back in for visa visits and family events, no problem.... |
| Posted by: Frank G 2005-02-10 7:16:19 PM |
| #6 How can that be? Seymour Hersh says we have scads of operatives throughout Iran. He wouldn't lie to us, would he? |
| Posted by: AJackson 2005-02-10 7:13:51 PM |
| #5 Amen, Barbara. Few have done more to harm the US than the Church Commission. |
| Posted by: .com 2005-02-10 7:09:56 PM |
#4 US lacking HUMINT on IranWell, DUH. And on a lot of other countries, too. For that you can thank Frank Church - may he rot in hell - and successor weasels. (May they rot there, too.) |
| Posted by: Barbara Skolaut 2005-02-10 3:06:12 PM |
| #3 Verlaine, interesting take. However, from what I interpret your post to mean, is David Kay speaking of "credibility intelligence"? (ie info to validate the argument about Iranian WMDs) I'm more concerned about tactical/strategic intelligence such as "where as the bombs" ... |
| Posted by: Edward Yee 2005-02-10 2:36:51 AM |
| #2 "CIA reactionaries crawl back out of woodwork to bash Bush" |
| Posted by: someone 2005-02-10 1:10:15 AM |
| #1 No, David, the tendency is to make prudent decisions where the burden falls on the proven reckless genocidal WMD-building rogue state up to its neck in ties to terrorism including the new global nasty variety, when the question is mass-casualty attacks on the US and its allies. Sheesh. If US intel had "huge credibility problems" then why is the world seized with the problems of nukes in NoKo and Iran? The huge credibility problem is with David Kay and like-minded folks who can't think straight or keep their facts straight or exhibit much common sense. |
| Posted by: Verlaine in Iraq 2005-02-10 12:57:51 AM |