You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
Japan: LDP approves bill; 'Response to attack'
2005-02-09
Japan's ruling party agreed Tuesday to let the defense chief react to a missile strike without first consulting the cabinet, amid worry the nation's strict chain of command could delay its response to an attack, officials said. The bill was approved by two committees of the Liberal Democratic Party, paving the way for government approval later this month, a party official said. The bill would let the chief of Japan's Defense Agency order the interception of a missile without approval of the cabinet or informing parliament.

It would also streamline the organization of the military, known as the Self-Defense Forces, to put the army, navy and air force under a unified command of a Joint Staff. Japan renounced war in its constitution imposed by the United States after defeat in World War II and officially does not have a military or defense ministry. But there have been worries that Japan would waste too much time in administrative procedures before reacting to an attack, as a missile fired from North Korea would reach the country in 10 minutes.
KCNA eruption in 5-4-3-...
Posted by:Fred

#5  Japan needed a shock to get them to surrender. There was still a bunch of die-hards in the military that said no to surrender. The first bomb made the point.

The second bomb reinforced the first.

The third bomb was going to be armed and ready, but the second one did the trick.

The message of complete and utter destruction finally got through. A lot of Japanese lives were lost, but in the grim and gristly arithmetic of war, a lot of Japanese and allied lives were ultimately saved. That is my answer to Nosemonkey, a2u.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2005-02-09 11:48:03 PM  

#4  All right, I have a question.

Did we nuke Japan in anger?

Was the 2nd bomb just because we had it lying around and could?

Over at EU Referendum Nosemonkey wrote that and I strongly disagreed.

Then he has a problem they can't say boo w/o our approval.

Bombing in anger isn't the 1st time I've heard it. I need ammo.

Posted by: anonymous2u   2005-02-09 11:33:00 PM  

#3  A Thousand Lives for Sony!
Posted by: Shipman   2005-02-09 3:34:44 PM  

#2  KCNA will have to get the Sea of Fire guy back, if he hasn't starved to death yet.
Posted by: Spot   2005-02-09 9:25:41 AM  

#1  Heh, heh. The NorKs aren't the only ones who are getting rather worried by Japan's re-emergence. Doncha know the ChiComs are wondering about all those plans they have for The Middle Kingdom... Back to the drawing board, boys.

Mebbe Japan should invite more Tiawanese officials over for some go tournaments...
Posted by: .com   2005-02-09 6:22:00 AM  

00:00