You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Tehran Times: New dawn in Iraq
2005-01-30
The new era in Iraq finally began to dawn with a massive voter turnout in Sunday's election and some bloody incidents.
Criminal terrorists tried to sabotage the election by carrying out attacks on polling stations, but the determined Iraqi people braved the threats of the gunmen.
After enduring eight decades of dictatorship and crime, the Iraqi nation has taken the first steps on the path toward a bright future and democracy -- a new phenomenon in Arab world.
The Iraqi people have experienced great suffering due to dictatorships, geopolitical conditions, and demography.
And, unfortunately, some neighboring Arab countries played a direct role in setting up despotic governments in Iraq, since they cannot tolerate the rule of democracy in Iraq due to its complicated ethnic makeup.
Indisputable evidence discovered after the fall of the Baath regime showed that Saddam Hussein could not have committed such crimes against his own people without these Arab states' support.
The Shia in the south of Iraq and the Kurds in the north succeeded in liberating 14 of the country's 18 provinces in 1991, shortly after the Iraqi Army was driven out of Kuwait. But certain Arab states pressured former U.S. president George Bush and he eventually gave Saddam the green light to brutally suppress the Shia and Kurdish uprising.
Saddam's government was on the brink of collapse, but the leaders of some Arab countries helped the Baathists quell the Iraqi nation's uprising mercilessly, since they preferred a weak Saddam to a democratic government.
Some 450,000 Shia and Kurds were massacred by Iraqi troops loyal to Saddam, who continued carrying out crimes due to the Arab states' misunderstanding of the Shias.
If power had been transferred through holding a free referendum under the supervision of the United Nations and the international community in 1991, Iraq and the rest of the region would not have witnessed such painful events.
In addition, the United States would not have felt compelled to sacrifice so many lives and spend such a huge amount of money to overthrow Saddam, and the Iraqi nation would have been able to establish a popular government calmly and without carnage.
Yet, the Iraqi people, despite their ethnic and sectarian differences, have maintained their national identity and cast their votes freely in order to find a logical way to resolve the current crisis.
Although the election cannot put an end to the current crises and challenges in Iraq, it will open a new horizon in the country's political life.
However, Iraq faces several challenges in the post-election era, such as establishing security, expelling foreign Arab terrorists, setting a timetable for the withdrawal of occupying forces, and beginning the process of economic reconstruction.
Iraqi officials must adopt new policies according to the country's history and should determine which neighboring countries really seek the interests of the Iraqi nation.
Posted by:Anonymoose

#6  Glereper - Cynic that I am, I can't help but wonder if it was the same in Persian, or if it was written strictly for foreign consumption.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2005-01-30 10:08:29 PM  

#5  I am sure a few heads will roll (and I dont mean figuratively) for having the balls to write this article.
Posted by: Glereper Craviter7929   2005-01-30 9:57:10 PM  

#4  Lol! Point taken. Sigh. Brit Hume & Co were particularly amazed today by the lameness / transparency of Kerry's statements attempting to play down & minimize the election's success. The Kool Aid seems to be getting stronger.
Posted by: .com   2005-01-30 8:58:34 PM  

#3  Agreed, but it's still a more positive commentary than you'd get from several Democratic Senators.
Posted by: Matt   2005-01-30 8:54:08 PM  

#2  I think they're just saying that Arab regimes have had their way up till now - and it's time to let the Persians (in the form of Mad Mullahs) have a shot at fucking up Iraq.
Posted by: .com   2005-01-30 8:24:15 PM  

#1  TehranTimes? Wow! Is it actually available to Iranians?
Posted by: Frank G   2005-01-30 8:21:41 PM  

00:00