You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Pentagon downplays report of secret intelligence unit
2005-01-25
EFL:
The Pentagon says the political uproar over the disclosure of a secret military intelligence group is overblown and based on misinformation about the group's makeup and mission. Stephen A. Cambone, the Pentagon's top intelligence official, rushed to Capitol Hill on Monday after some members of Congress reacted strongly to a Washington Post report that revealed the existence of the group, which is managed by the Pentagon's Defense Intelligence Agency.

Senator Diane Feinstein and others appeared puzzled by the disclosure that the Pentagon had created a new battlefield intelligence group — "strategic support teams," in Pentagon parlance — to perform clandestine missions that had been largely the province of the CIA. Some suggested Rumsfeld had skirted congressional oversight to expand his domain. Pentagon officials told reporters, however, that the arrangement had been worked out in close coordination with the CIA and that appropriate congressional committees had been fully informed. A senior military official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said CIA director Porter Goss told him Monday that he had "no issue or questions or concerns" about the Pentagon arrangement. Another defense official said lawmakers may not recognize the news media's descriptions of the intelligence group because its name was changed after they were briefed on it last year. Now called strategic support teams, they were previously known as humint augmentation teams, the official said, speaking only on condition that he not be further identified. (Humint refers to human intelligence, or information provided by spies.)

In an additional point of clarification, the senior military official said the intelligence teams are not to be used for covert actions, which are unacknowledged by the government and which require a legal "finding" by the president. Rather, they are for clandestine actions, which are meant to be secret but are subject to acknowledgment by the government if publicly disclosed. The chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, John Warner, a Virginia Republican, and the panel's top Democrat, Carl Levin of Michigan, met for more than an hour with Cambone, the undersecretary of defense for intelligence. Later, Warner said he was satisfied by the briefing and would ensure that other committee members were briefed fully as well.

The teams — each with about 10 mostly civilian linguists, case officers, interrogators and debriefers — are designed to provide the military's conventional and special operations forces with more sustainable battlefield intelligence to support combat and other activities. The defense officials said this is not a new mission for military intelligence; rather, they said, it is being structured in a new way so that it can be provided to battlefield commanders in a more standardized manner. It previously had been done in a more ad hoc way, they said.
Posted by:Steve

#3  I hate to disclose military secrets, because they made me sign those disclosure agreements, but we have had "strategic support teams" or something like them for as long as we have had a military. This is not news, but an overblown story. For some reason the LLL gets squirmy when they think of Rumsfield having Intelligence assets or spies working for him. People they were there long before he showed up, if only under a different name. They are not going to show up on som LLL doorstep anytime soon, unless the rules have changed. Come to think of it, wouldn't it be funny to fake a Black Helicopter/Secret Soldier ops onto some LLL doorstep? Can you imagine the stain Hersch would make if he saw black-clad troops landing on his front lawn?
Posted by: Cyber Sarge   2005-01-25 4:54:27 PM  

#2  Just what we need "santitized" war making dipped in heavy bureacracy.

As for DiFi, "appearing puzzled" is her nature state.
Posted by: Captain America   2005-01-25 3:03:23 PM  

#1  Permit me to better state this headline:

Washington Post Plays Up Black Opns for Self Interest and Political Bias Motives.

Isn't Marine Times now run by Gannet? Gannet of USA Today fame.
Posted by: Captain America   2005-01-25 2:57:59 PM  

00:00