You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
It's Just Business, Nothing Geopolitical
2005-01-17
Sure it is, and I've got a bridge for sale ...
Shut up and keep buying.
HONG KONG — Few countries are benefiting as much as China these days from the international status quo - and Beijing knows it. So, as American criticisms of China have shifted from human rights to the value of its currency and the aggressiveness of its trade practices, Chinese leaders have tried hard to keep the peace while exporting ever more. China's economy is doubling in size every 10 years, and personal incomes have been climbing steeply, especially in the cities. Trade with the United States plays a huge role in that growth, as investors around the world pour money into Chinese factories that make goods destined mainly for the American market.

China's trade surplus with the United States now equals slightly more than a 10th of its entire economic output - an extraordinary figure, considering how much of the country's economic output is inherently unexportable, from haircuts and construction to the Big Macs and grande mochas at the proliferating McDonald's and Starbucks stores. China is both a huge beneficiary of American consumer appetites, and profoundly dependent on them.

That dependence makes China nervous, especially when the Bush administration imposes restrictions on Chinese shipments to the United States - everything from steel to bedroom furniture to brassieres. "The Bush administration should have a vision and play a leading role in globalization and international trade, rather than sending a message to the world that 'We care more about our own businesses than anybody else's,' " said Xu Xiaonian, a prominent Shanghai economist, voicing a common sentiment.
Restrictions are inadequate. It's like trying to "restrict" a hurricane.
China needs a prosperous America, with economic policies that not only steer clear of protectionism but also encourage consumption and keep the dollar fairly stable. Low interest rates and big budget deficits have helped in the short term, by fueling a consumption binge in the United States.
Helped who? Certainly not the United States.
While China has stayed focused on providing jobs for the millions of workers coming off its farms or losing jobs at inefficient state-owned enterprises, geopolitical issues like the war in Iraq have been only a secondary concern. China needs secure sea lanes for its ever-rising oil imports, and like the rest of Asia, it implicitly relies on the American Navy to keep the tankers safe.
Oh goodie, another NATO scenario. What's not to like?
From Beijing's point of view, although not Washington's, the thorniest issue is also the oldest: America's continued support for Taiwan, which China regards as a renegade province. China has warned again in recent weeks that the United States should stop providing military support for the island.
All it takes to solve the problem is for China to go democratic.
But with the planned purchase of I.B.M.'s personal computer division by Beijing-based Lenovo, China's main message is, "Want a desktop computer to go with that microwave oven?"
EMPHASIS ADDED
Meanwhile, America's politicians rearrange deck chairs on the deck of an economic Titanic.
Posted by:Zenster

#10  http://www.unm.edu/~hmuller/hybridEDIT.htm

Concurrent with this national policy shift, a change in the location of auto industry investments took place. Sites in the north became more attractive for the establishment of auto plants oriented towards greater integration with US industry. These included plants in the states of Aguascalientes (Nissan, 1985), Durango (Renault, 1982), Coahuila (GM and Chrysler, 1981), Chihuahua and Sonora (Ford, 1985).

As a result of the trend towards greater integration of the Mexican auto industry with US and international production, today, road vehicles make up the largest proportion of exports from Mexico to the US [US Department of Commerce, 1996, p. 800], and automobiles, transport equipment and auto parts make up the largest part of both imports and exports [Bank of Mexico, 1996, see Table 49]. Although Ford had only a fifth place participation in domestic sales in the Mexican market, the plant in Hermosillo placed the company at the forefront of automobile exports from Mexico. Before the plant opened in 1986, Ford did not participate in exporting automobiles from Mexico. Its Cuautitlán plant, built in 1964, served the domestic market. In its first year, the Hermosillo plant boosted Ford’s participation to 32 percent of total units exported from Mexico (163,073 units overall), and, after increasing plant capacity to 170,000 vehicles per year in 1990, the plant represented approximately 27 percent of the installed capacity for producing automobiles for export [Micheli, 1994, p. 225]. This figure illustrates the importance of the plant to Mexico’s economic strategy of North American market integration and export-oriented growth.
Posted by: ed   2005-01-17 6:34:46 PM  

#9  Well.....VW does make cars in Mexico...
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2005-01-17 5:54:29 PM  

#8  If cheap labor were the whole story we'd be buying cars made in Mexico or Brazil.
Posted by: Mrs. Davis   2005-01-17 4:57:07 PM  

#7  Oh, Detroit may go down, but the US auto industry is doing fine. I'm talking those American companies like Nissan, Honda, Toyota, and Mazda. They all have plants in the US and design centers here (often Orange County). Toyota is going to be the largest automobile maker in the world within 10 years.

I really doubt that China can really compete with them. Do they have an original product? Do they have good build quality? Will their system allow them to change quickly in response to market events? Is their basic economy on a sound foundation?

Now in more stable industries, or those in which original content is very small (ripoffs of western IP), they can do well.
Posted by: jackal   2005-01-17 4:39:45 PM  

#6  Anonymoose - Not sure that having Taiwan would give them control of the pacific. No matter how big a navy they build in the next 20 years, I think the US will have the ability to annihilate any and all merchant shipping world wide, right up to their very ports.

The reverse won't be possible. China could cause chaos, sure, but a long term naval war still ends like WW2 did for the Japanese, with their fleet sunk and US carriers and subs off their coast.
Posted by: Laurence of the Rats   2005-01-17 10:06:22 AM  

#5  China may buy, export, and reverse engineer, but they will never innovate. So much for a closed "commodity" society.
Posted by: Captain America   2005-01-17 9:53:27 AM  

#4  China needs secure sea lanes for its ever-rising oil imports, and like the rest of Asia, it implicitly relies on the American Navy to keep the tankers safe. And this is why they have been building and buying an enormous, deep water navy in a crash program for 20 years--so that they can protect their merchant marine. Unfortunately, it also means that they MUST have Taiwan, or their entire southern coast, and its shipping, can be neutralized. But if they do have Taiwan, they have the de facto control of the Pacific that Japan wanted in WWII.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2005-01-17 9:36:11 AM  

#3  Zenster, do you realize that every time you post an article on China, you erode my faith in democracy? Dammit man! :P
Posted by: Edward Yee   2005-01-17 3:04:55 AM  

#2  ed: And China will soon export cars to the US. Let Detroit try and compete with $100/month labor.

Detroit can compete, by opening plants in Southeast Asian countries that pay $300 per month, like Thailand. (Why Thailand? Because the odds are that Uncle Sam will never go to war with Thailand). Because big labor has its forearms around Detroit's throat, this will never happen, and Detroit will die slowly, instead of being able to take advantage of cheap labor abroad while harnessing American design skills.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2005-01-17 2:41:22 AM  

#1  And China will soon export cars to the US. Let Detroit try and compete with $100/month labor.
Posted by: ed   2005-01-17 2:22:46 AM  

00:00