You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq-Jordan
Petty officer Pablo Paredes, considered a deserter, reports for duty
2004-12-22
Posted by:Frank G

#10  And besides, getting drunk is, as a rule, a traditional soldierly pursuit. Well, it's more of a guideline, actually. "Mad Drunk and Resistin' the Guard" or some such...
Posted by: mojo   2004-12-22 5:37:24 PM  

#9  Bar - Right on. English Law, the basis of our system, utterly hinges on intent. And he tosses up that example of intent thinking it vindicates, rather than condemns, his client? This clown claims to be a lawyer? Lol!
Posted by: .com   2004-12-22 2:19:23 PM  

#8  "Should a guy be punished for his political beliefs more harshly than someone who misses his ship because he is out getting drunk?" Warren [Paredes' lawyer] asked.

I can't believe this guy actually said that.
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2004-12-22 11:48:14 AM  

#7  Thanks for the link to Smash. ::waving hi to the slowly thawing Alaska Paul and family::
Posted by: Seafarious   2004-12-22 11:18:33 AM  

#6   I rather suspect that the Navy will unload on this fellow.


As do I. This a-hole brought it on himself with his 15 minutes of "look at me" publicity. Make an example of him.
Posted by: Frank G   2004-12-22 11:16:40 AM  

#5  From the article: "Should a guy be punished for his political beliefs more harshly than someone who misses his ship because he is out getting drunk?" Warren [Paredes' lawyer] asked. "The question is how hard is the Navy going to slam him."

I'll let the mil folks here answer the question, but I rather suspect that the Navy will unload on this fellow.
Posted by: Steve White   2004-12-22 11:07:48 AM  

#4  The author of this piece, Rick Rogers, has a very shallow knowledge of military justice for a man who makes his living in a navy town. Article 85 para. a 2 of the UCMJ reads: (a) Any member of the armed forces who--.... (2) quits his unit, organization, or place of duty with intent to avoid hazardous duty or to shirk important service; or....
This is not a matter of absence, but of refusal to serve.

Posted by: GK   2004-12-22 10:58:59 AM  

#3  Smash has nice pics of the USS Midway museum. Alaska Paul and his family are touring it this AM
Posted by: Frank G   2004-12-22 10:48:41 AM  

#2  If you're not already following this and related stories on Citizen Smash, go there now for some great stories and pictures. ANSWER and cronies are afoot, but Smash and Protest Warrior are there to counter 'em.
Posted by: Dar   2004-12-22 10:27:01 AM  

#1  What a moron.
Posted by: Cyber Sarge   2004-12-22 10:16:24 AM  

00:00