You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia
Russia Claims to Be Building New Nuclear Weapon
2004-11-18
Posted by:Mark Espinola

#3  Theoretically, it should mean a significant boost to the Navy's budget, as at minimum the Navy will have to upgrade its worldwide SATWAR and sib detection nets, and in layered defense; and will also likely have to build, deploy, and keep on near-permanent locale more hunter-killer subs and multipurpose "sea control" surface ships, prob includ armed airships or other air-based slow armed platforms. The sooner GMD is operational and Communism implodes and forever dies, the better for the budget and the US taxpayer.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2004-11-18 10:45:03 PM  

#2  Outside of deploying multiple maneuverable independ-targetable re-entry vehicles/warheads, i.e missle(s) within a missle, another pragmatic anti-GMD covert method is to deploy submarine-launched hypersonic, variable maneuver, LR "fire-and-forget" cruise missles, includ "pop-up" SLCMS that can maneuver, evade, and defend underwater, i.e. "sub within a sub". IOW, HYBRIDS OR UW versions of remote- or "brilliant" [FAF] UAVS/UARVs, aka Unmanned [Maneuverable]Submersible Attack Vehicles, or similar. This can explain why the Russians and Chicom PLAN are engaging in intensified underwater surveys, and going gaga reportedly buying up underwater geography maps from any source - HEADS UP, SSN Boyz, YOUR "JUTLAND", OR PEARL HARBOR, MAY ABOUT TO DAWN ON NAVAL WARFARE! Subs, likely based on the TYPHOON/AKULA hull series, that can not only land large first-strike commando units/forces but can also launch underwater first-strike mini-vehicles. The rest,as is said, is POLITICS.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2004-11-18 10:17:34 PM  

#1  Hit the button too soon. This is the video link
Posted by: Mark Espinola   2004-11-18 7:47:10 AM  

00:00