You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Powell Calls It Quits: Analysis
2004-11-17
From The Diplomad; a blog I've been reading for a while now:
I was in the Department the day that Powell arrived. He was a breath of fresh air after a string of very bad Secretaries of State, starting with Jim Baker, continuing with the comatose Warren Christopher, and then the vile Madeleine Albright. The State Department was in disarray, morale was at rock bottom, literally hundreds of officers had quit or taken early retirement. Our Embassies in many countries were barely functional, and very exposed to terrorist attack. Department employees were constantly being lectured on the need "to do more with less" but no reform of the bureaucracy was undertaken to make it leaner and more efficient; everything was pretty much left as it was, but just given less money -- except of course for Albright's travels, in (my office) she was known as the "Empress" for her lavish demands on the budget.

So Powell was a relief. He quickly set about getting State extra resources, undertook some reforms (not enough in the end) of how we operated, pushed more resources out to the Embassies, and dragged State into a modern communications/IT environment (some offices and Embassies were still using WANGs!) He spoke of empowering the "field commanders," making them less dependent on Washington, encouraged unorthodox thinking, and reminded supervisors of the need to "take care of the troops." He loosened up the onerous restrictions on FSOs talking to members of Congress and staff. All good things.

On the substance of policy, however, he proved highly conventional...
The article continues at the link.
Posted by:Seafarious

#3  I think General Powell missed the golden ring back in '96, he'd have beaten Clinton. Recently he's just comfortable taking orders. :(
Posted by: Shipman   2004-11-17 5:59:54 PM  

#2  In sports, it's called the All-Airport team. Looks great walking into the hotel, all the fans love him, talks a great game, but when you look at the stats, there's no there there.

Can't remember who mentioned this, but a year ago, a journalist stated that when you talked to Rumsfeld you heard a man with a true vision of how he wanted to transform the Pentagon while Powell mouthed "boilerplate" (his quote).

No great loss.
Posted by: Dreadnought   2004-11-17 5:03:41 PM  

#1  Yeah, yeah. What exactly did Powell achieve? Did a fine job defusing Indo-Pak, but I don't see any other accomplishments aside from making himself look good in Bob Woodward's book, smirking and winking to MSM journalists about how he disagreed with his president's policies, and getting the disastrous 2nd UNSC resolution, the one that resulted in his complete humiliation by the French popinjay. He argued against halting fascist slaughter in Iraq as he had done earlier reagrding fascist slaughter in the balkans. He did absolutely nothing to improve his administration's image in Europe.

In sum, a sh*tty performance by the most feckless Sec State we've seen in a long time.
Posted by: lex   2004-11-17 4:11:22 PM  

00:00