You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Short Attention Span Theater-
Meet our long-lost cousins
2004-10-27
SHE stands a metre tall, has a brain the size of a chimpanzee and her knuckles reach down to her knees - meet homo floresiensis, pin-up girl of the scientific world.

The newly discovered species of human, dubbed "the Hobbit", is being hailed as the most significant scientific find of the past century and was unearthed by NSW archaeologists.

Named after the Indonesian island of Flores where she was found, the female is thought to have been 30 years old when she died of natural causes.

Scientists have pieced together an image - with the male of the species pictured right - of a hairless, dark-skinned dwarf with a comparatively small head, countersunk eyes, flat nose, big teeth and mouth jutting forward with virtually no chin.

But what has scientists at the University of New England, Armidale, so excited is that the species lived as recently as 13,000 years ago - long after homo sapiens began walking the planet.

"It's a totally different human species which lived side-by-side with us for 40,000 years at least," Associate Professor Mike Morwood, an archeologist on the dig, said.

"It means two different types of human existed at the same time. To say we're excited's an understatement.

"Never in our wildest dreams did we think we'd find such a complete specimen. We were expecting tests to show the date of the bones to be around 100,000 years old.

"When it came back at 18,000, we thought it was a mistake. But it's right."

Further excavations in the Liang Bua cave site in July and August have unearthed remains 13,000 years "young".

Associate Professor Peter Brown, also of UNE, added: "Finding a spaceship would have been less of a surprise. This sort of species was supposed to have been extinct for a long time.

"Then we find a brand new species on Flores - yesterday, in archaeological terms.

"We don't know how they got there because Flores is very isolated. We discovered stone tools and evidence of rock formations, suggesting the species used fire.

"Although the brain size tells us they weren't as bright as us, it's clear information was processed in the same way."

The team believes homo floresiensis was wiped out by a volcanic eruption about 12,000 years ago.

"If it hadn't been for that eruption, this species would still be on the planet today," the University of Wollongong's Professor Bert Roberts said.

The team told Nature magazine Flores until recently was "a kind of Lost World".
Posted by:tipper

#6  Damn! I was hoping for the missing link. Now we have Piltdown Person again.....
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2004-10-27 10:27:59 PM  

#5  Mucky, where did you say you were from?
Posted by: whitecollar redneck   2004-10-27 10:17:14 PM  

#4  There are also legends of furry bipeds (besides orangutans) of various different kinds all through Malaysia and Indonesia; the best-known of these in the west is the "Orang Pendek;" I was under the impression, however, that they were supposed to be more apelike, and more solitary, than the creatures described above.
Posted by: Phil Fraering   2004-10-27 10:04:33 PM  

#3  However, the accounts sound eerily close to the Hawaiian "Menehune":
http://tinyurl.com/3wfxo/
Menehune lack a lot of the mythological attributes assigned to fanciful critters like leprachauns. The stories surrounding them are downright ordinary. They are described like a non-competing neighbor tribe that just died out.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2004-10-27 9:23:28 PM  

#2  Having heard some media reports on this. Beware the clueless journalist syndrome. Its well established that island populations frequently become dwarf or giant variants. That is they are not a separate species and it seems to happen quickly - a few tens of generations. The fact they are small in no way implies a separate species. Think the opposite of Somoans or Fijians.
Posted by: phil_b   2004-10-27 8:56:28 PM  

#1  Not to offend the relatives, but I read this article first and took note of these key lines:

"The specimens' ages range from 95,000 to 12,000 years old..."

"Inbreeding certainly would've been a danger."

"Now, scientists are more puzzled by the specimen's jumble of features that appear to be borrowed from different human ancestors."


I think these guys are jumping to awfully wild conclusions based on one incomplete skeleton and some other fragments, all with a wide range of dates.
Posted by: Tom   2004-10-27 8:44:33 PM  

00:00