You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
No flu shots, sue a trial lawyer
2004-10-24
So why is it that 100 percent of our flu vaccines are now made by two companies in Europe? The answer is simple. Trial lawyers drove the American manufacturers out of the business. In 1967 there were 26 companies making vaccines in the United States. Today there are only four that make any type of vaccine and none making flu vaccine. Wyeth was the last to fall, dropping flu shots after 2002. For recently emerging illnesses such as Lyme disease, there is no commercial vaccine, even though one has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration.

All this is the result of a legal concept called "liability without fault" that emerged from the hothouse atmosphere of the law schools in the 1960s and became the law of the land. Under the old "negligence" regime, you had to prove a product manufacturer had done something wrong in order to hold it liable for damages. Under liability without fault, on the other hand, the manufacturer can be held responsible for harm from its products, whether blameworthy or not. Add to that the jackpot awards that come from pain-and-suffering and punitive damages, and you have a legal climate that no manufacturer wants to risk.
Now, ain't one of those guys running for VP a trial lawyer who made his money on medical malpractice cases? Funny you don't hear nothing about that, huh?
Posted by:RWV

#3  read the Steyn article I posted if ya wanna know about the "perfect little health system" in the Great White North
Posted by: Frank G   2004-10-24 10:15:40 AM  

#2  Another part of the problem with the drugs, is that in this case the government is the major procurement agent. Its just like the defense industry that in the early 70s were there were scores of companies, but today a small handful. They've had to consolidate or go out of business because of the nature of government procurement. The government wants the lowest price it can get for obvious short term reasons. As a consequence the incentive for companies to remain in competition, even though they may only get a major contract every five or eight years, is not there. The government drives the price down so low as to reduce the profit of the manufacturer below a point to invest the capital and labor, to sustain it through long term absences of work. Since the government is by volume the market setting buyer, its an all or nothing commodity supply. In this case, the commodity is now no longer available. The fall back is for the government itself to become the manufacturer which will further drive producers out of the market or to introduce real market incentives back into the process, which is politically undoable since they have poisoned the environment with their playing to the mob with the propaganda of the "Rich Evil Drug Companies".
Posted by: Don   2004-10-24 10:10:55 AM  

#1  This seems to be my cousin's(the Kerryite) primary beef with Bush.I went to those web sites you guys gave me,down-loaded facts and figures.It all boiled down to"I don't care,anybody but Bush".
Posted by: raptor   2004-10-24 8:00:00 AM  

00:00