You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq-Jordan
Armed Iranian fighters arrested in Samarra
2004-10-05
The Interim Iraqi Interior Minister stated that armed Iranian agents have been arrested among rebels fighting in the city of Samarra. The Al-Hurriya TV aired footage of Falah Naqib who accused Iran of backing insurgents in this presently volatile region of Iraq. Fighting in Samarra has left over 150 rebels and one U.S. soldier dead. On Sunday, residents said they heard random explosions as U.S. and Iraqi forces hunted for insurgent holdouts. Iraqi police have been patrolling the city, while U.S. troops and Iraqi Forces search houses for rebels and weapons caches. Military sources also confirmed that following extensive clashes between U.S. troops and the rebel militia, a large number of armed agents working for Iran's Ministry of Intelligence and Security (MOIS) were arrested.
"Howdy boys, say, ya'll ain't from round here are you?"
Naqib's comments came after U.S. forces separately confirmed the arrests of 80 Iranian fighters who had posed as regular Iraqis. Iraqi Interior Ministry spokesman Sabah Kazem also recently confirmed that the flow of Iranian arms and agents into Iraq was continuing. "The Iranian regime's declared policy contradicts the events that are taking place," he said. "In its comments, Iran speaks about the need to establish security in Iraq. What actually happens, however, is the complete opposite, so much that we arrest individuals every day coming with their weapons from Iran into Iraq," Kazem added.

Last week Iran Focus reported the arrest of Nashaat Abd Ali Al-Hussaini, an Iranian agent who was detained and later made startling revelations in his interrogation about the role of the Iranian embassy in Baghdad in the espionage and sabotage activities conducted by clerical regime. Al-Hussaini's also revealed that his handler was Mohammad Qorbani, a senior agent of the MOIS who is working under diplomatic cover in the Iranian embassy in Baghdad and who runs a large spy ring in Iraq. Iran's Revolutionary Guards and other state agencies have been sending more gunmen and weapons into Iraq in recent weeks in preparation for a "hot October", according to sources in the Iranian government with a good knowledge of security issues.
Posted by:Steve

#15  JQC, I think that you are assuming that a Shiite is a Shiite. The majority of the Iraqi variety have no interest in being controlled from Tehran thus Iran is funding the resistance.
Posted by: Super Hose   2004-10-06 1:15:44 AM  

#14  Sorry for the additional post.

Piss ant analogy. Hey honey, where's my other bottle of JacK. Maybe that'al clear things up and get er done.
Posted by: John (Q. Citizen)   2004-10-05 11:46:05 PM  

#13  What am I missing here? The Iranians are Shi'ites. Under an election system in Iraq, the Shi'ites would have significant control just due to numbers. So 1-2-3-4 what the hell are they fighting for? I guess I'm just too Western. Is the logical conclusion they are fighting to drive us out. They seem to follow a fire ant or wasp nest analogy.
Posted by: John (Q. Citizen)   2004-10-05 11:42:03 PM  

#12  Y'know all those nuclear mines we had that we might use if the Soviet army came across the Inter-German border area? Maybe we need to plant a few of those along the Iraq/Iran border. Just be sure to warn the Iraqis to stay away from the border region because "we're gonna fly Apache gunships there, and they'll fire at anything moving". We'd have a "hot October" all right, about 35,000 degrees Celcius hot. Doubt if there'd be much cross-border traffic after the first one went off, though...
Posted by: Old Patriot   2004-10-05 11:38:31 PM  

#11  Brett: WTF?? and another WTF?? for his proposal to shut down the best deterrent we have against underground nukes. Kerry's insane.
Posted by: lex   2004-10-05 6:38:49 PM  

#10  tu -- In Shi'ite logic that would be a victory.
Posted by: V is for Victory   2004-10-05 6:23:42 PM  

#9  Send them back to Iran.
In pieces.
Posted by: tu3031   2004-10-05 3:27:50 PM  

#8  Dang...why in the heck do we not trumpet this on national TV?
Posted by: anymouse   2004-10-05 2:45:27 PM  

#7  "Say, boys - y'know that Shat-al-Arab y'all used to have access to?..."
Posted by: mojo   2004-10-05 2:36:11 PM  

#6  And sKerry wants to give these people nuclar fuel based on their promises to allow us to re-process it?

Can I get a big WTF?
Posted by: Brett_the_Quarkian   2004-10-05 2:28:31 PM  

#5  Armed Iranian agents fighting in Samarra? Yep, that's a case o' belly, alright. I've been wanting to see mullahs swinging from lampposts ever since 1979; let 'er rip!
Posted by: Dave D.   2004-10-05 2:17:02 PM  

#4  Not a good time for Iran to piss of the US when we've got 100,000 + highly motivated and well trained military just next door. I'm sure we've got a few MOAB's that are gathering dust and need a place to nest.

For President Bush this wouldn't be wagging the dog...rather just twisting the turban.
Posted by: RN   2004-10-05 2:15:13 PM  

#3  need a pliars and blowtorch graphic for these assholes. Dead men
Posted by: Frank G   2004-10-05 2:04:51 PM  

#2  Isn't this grounds for attacking Iran? After all, Iran is engaging in military action against the US and its allies. Is there not enough proof that this is officially sanctioned? Is our reluctance purely political?
Posted by: PlanetDan   2004-10-05 2:04:13 PM  

#1  "There are no Iranians in Samarra. They are CIA plants. The Jews are behind it."

(How soon before that's a headline?)
Posted by: nada   2004-10-05 1:59:57 PM  

00:00