You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Africa: Horn
UN's shame over Sudan
2004-09-18
ANOTHER month, another 10,000 dead. The United Nations will today let down the people of Darfur again.
"They're all Negoes. They don't feel pain like we do."
On 30 July, the UN Security Council warned Sudan that it had 30 days to clean up its act and end the persecution of its people in the region. A month later, a damning UN report demonstrated that it had done no such thing.
Sounds like they need another 30 days. These things can't be rushed, y'know...
Today, more than two weeks on from the publication of that report, and after days of diplomatic wrangling, the Security Council is to vote on a fresh resolution which many hoped would leave Khartoum in no doubt it had run out of time.
... a month and a half ago.
It will do no such thing. China and Russia have seen to that, along with a handful of other states with their own idiosyncratic reasons for letting Sudan off the hook. What the Security Council will vote on will be a watered-down resolution backed only by the vaguest of threats.
"Boy, you're gonna get it! We're warning you!"
"Ehrrrmmm... Take out the word 'warning.' Make it 'admonishing.'"
The US and Britain had demanded sanctions against Sudan's oil industry to focus its mind on the demands of the international community. But Sudan is the fourth-largest supplier of oil to China, and Beijing would not tolerate that. It threatened to veto the resolution.
"Nope. Nope. Can't do it. Africa's got more Negroes than we have oil. If they start to run out of one or the other we'll look into the matter again."
How many US/UK warships does it take to stopper up the Red Sea again?
Posted by:tipper

#2  But Sudan is the fourth-largest supplier of oil to China, and Beijing would not tolerate that.

At some point China's ruthless Mandarins will require a reading of the riot act. When even one world leader exhibits the testicular endowment to do so, I may begin to regain a scintilla of respect for politicians. Certainly not before then. There is no single nation on earth that does not bear some partial burden of shame over Darfur. This was an entirely preventable horror known well in advance and utterly predictable. Sudan's government should be executed en masse for this crime against humanity.

Just as it did in July, the UN has backed away from reinforcing its words with the threat of sanctions and demonstrated once again why it has earned a reputation as a toothless talking shop, a League of Nations with smarter offices and bigger expense accounts.

Gethin Chamberlain deserves a literary prize for his tidy description of the UN.
Posted by: Zenster   2004-09-18 12:40:48 PM  

#1  Headline's misleading.

The UN has no shame.

Though it's certainly shameful.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2004-09-18 11:23:28 AM  

00:00