You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Purple and Proud of It
2004-09-16
I usually disagree with Cohen, but I usually read his stuff to get a contrasting opinion to my own. He's not a koolade drinker, like his WaPo colleague, Colman McCarthy. When his opinion coincides with my opinion, we're usually talking about something pretty close to a certainty...
...The demonization of Bush is going to cost John Kerry plenty if it hasn't already. It so overstates the case against Bush that a levelheaded listener would be excused for thinking that there isn't one in the first place. It squeezes the middle, virtually forcing moderates to pick which bunch of nuts they're going to join. It's hard to know whom to loathe more -- religious zealots who would censor my reading and deny me the fruits of stem cell research or fervid hallucinators who belittle Saddam Hussein's crimes (or even Sept. 11) and wonder, in the throes of perpetual adolescence, whether the assassination of the president would not amount to a political mercy killing. It's all pretty repugnant.

But some of us cherish moderation, recoil from conspiracy theories and would like, if possible, to stick to the facts. We may dislike Bush's policies, but we do not vitriolically hate the man, think he stole the election or blame our own country for the crimes of Sept. 11. We are the proud Purples -- once the royal color, now the tattered banner of common sense.
Posted by:Fred

#5  Speaking as a fellow purple, the above discussion shows why a majority of centrists will vote against Kerry. I don't care much for religious types, but they don't pose anything like the threat to my family's security that Mikey Moore and his crowd do. The difference between the right's wackos and those on the left is like the difference between an obnoxious rap star and a murdering gang leader.
Posted by: lex   2004-09-16 4:04:29 PM  

#4  Taxpayer dollars should not be used to kill human babies. I agree with you on that part anyway.
Posted by: jules 187   2004-09-16 3:00:03 PM  

#3  Deny you the fruits of stem cell research? Let's review the facts: (1) no one opposes the use of adult stem cells -- which have led to dozens of cures and scientific breakthroughs; (2) no one has banned experiments with embryonic stem cells, which despite countless experiments have not led to a single cure; (3) private industry has shown no interest in funding embryionic stem cell research because it does not look very promising; (4) embryonic research is a polite term for killing human babies; (5) taxpayer dollars should not be used to kill human babies.
Posted by: bkderwood   2004-09-16 2:56:54 PM  

#2  Dreadnought-I agree, no one is tearing books out of anyone's hands. The point made about stem cell research is a little more valid, it seems to me.
Posted by: jules 187   2004-09-16 2:44:18 PM  

#1  religious zealots who would censor my reading

I, for one, am tired of this canard. If you look at the main thrust of speech codes, thought control and censorship in this country, it emanates from the PC left.

Do some blue-haired Lutheran ladies get their knickers in a knot about that evil satanic boy Harry Potter and try to push him off the shelves at the public library in Enid, Oklahoma? No doubt. But not a one of them has gotten their claws into our nation's university system.
Posted by: Dreadnought   2004-09-16 2:39:46 PM  

00:00