You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Africa: Horn
EU Calls for U.N. Investigation on Sudan (again?)
2004-09-14
European Union foreign ministers called Monday for the United Nations to "immediately investigate" whether atrocities in Sudan's Darfur region constitute genocide, highlighting growing impatience with the Sudanese government for failing to end the conflict.
These guys stall worse than Dan Rather.
The 25 EU foreign ministers urged U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan to "establish as soon as possible" a special inquiry. In a statement they also urged Sudan to stop the fighting and implement a cease-fire in Darfur or face U.N. sanctions, including a possible oil embargo. They said there was "no indication that the government of Sudan has taken real and verifiable steps to disarm and neutralize" the warring factions. The ministers added an investigation was necessary to confirm Washington's claims that acts of genocide were being committed.
"Like, you expect us to take the word of a bunch of simple peasants?"
They called for "an international commission of inquiry ... to immediately investigate all violations of human rights and humanitarian law in Darfur, and to determine whether acts of genocide have occurred." British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw refused to call the atrocities in Darfur genocide but said an investigation was urgently needed. "Some people call it genocide, some people call it ethnic cleansing, some people call it civil war, some people call it none of the above," he said. "Whatever it is, it's a desperate situation which requires the urgent attention of the world."
Walks like a duck ...
His German counterpart, Joschka Fischer, called it "a humanitarian catastrophe with genocidal potential," while French Foreign Minister Michel Barnier said there was "massive violation of human rights" occurring.
... quacks like a duck ...
So far, the European Union has been hesitant to back Washington's claims that the crisis can be considered genocide.
... must be a penguin.
The EU ministers threatened sanctions against Sudan sometime starting in 2009, unless the French disagree "if no tangible progress is achieved" in meeting U.N. demands. "Sudan will need to understand that the prospect (of sanctions) will come much closer, turn into a reality, unless we see ... cooperation by them on this crucial issue of law and order and safety in Darfur," Straw said. He said that would be the focus of discussions at the U.N. Security Council later this week, which is expected to pass a newstrongly worded resolution against Sudan. Ismail said he doubted the United Nations would impose sanctions on Sudan, citing opposition from France and China some U.N. countries. "It would be very difficult for the U.S. or the Security Council of the United Nations to pass any sanctions on Sudan," he said in Seoul.
Might find it easier just to drop JDAMs.
Posted by:Super Hose

#12  This is simply too good to true for Mr Bush, He can effectively control both the Rebel force(CIA backed for years now)cause the "genocide" starvation/slaughter of thousands of civilians, and then respond as the great hero/salvation sending in troups to deliver the masses from the warring rebels. This has already been practiced on several other civilian populations in recent years, Somalia/Iraq though few of you would admit to paying for it with your Tax dollars, eh? What was the civilian death toll from US sanctions in IRAQ, 1.3 million was it.. nO more like 1.45 million in the Pre-Preemptive strike. Yeah who needs the Geneva convention anyway...it's so outdated.. Bush quote!
Posted by: Anonymous6449   2004-09-14 12:21:14 PM  

#11  2B its not really black on black but arab on black. In islam 'arabs' are more 'holy' or 'better' then blacks (or anyone else -- anyone in Indonesia listening?)

The MSM and United Nations will never pay more then token attention to the murder, rape, and genocide in Sudan until they can pin the blame on someone other then their allies (the Islamic terrorists).

When the MSM or UN can blame those who are against terrorism (Bush, Putin, Israel) the 'disaster' will be placed firmly on the front burner and the heat turned on high.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2004-09-14 12:34:08 PM  

#10  Yeah, Anon6449. Where are the saviors from the international community when you need them? Always flapping their mouths, never getting off the couch.
Posted by: jules 187   2004-09-14 12:26:06 PM  

#9  [Off-topic or abusive comments deleted]
Posted by: Anonymous6449 TROLL   2004-09-14 12:21:14 PM  

#8  Spot-ABC, if they were unbiased, should have followed it with a soundbite from our beloved and ethical partners in the UN asserting that it isn't genocide. ABC can't do that though; that would be switching teams in mid-game.

I wrote the BBC website in July that the world might finally get off its collective a** and do something about Darfur by October (ie, too late). I was wrong, of course. They aren't doing anything; they're just talking, as usual.

Could someone pass the creme and the fall agenda, please?
Posted by: jules 187   2004-09-14 11:12:41 AM  

#7  It's such a sad and hopeless situation that I find myself wanting to look away.

The Latte Left should be so completely ashamed of their silence on this issue. It hasn't seemed to enter their radar due to "nuance" that only an idiot can understand.

When they can somehow pin this on Bush, Sudan's atrocities will get full coverage and need immediate resolution. If Kerry wins, they will be content to let the black on black killing continue without mention.
Posted by: 2B   2004-09-14 11:03:30 AM  

#6  Keep investigating and sooner or later all those pesky natives and Christian will starve to death. That should fix the problem - NOT!
Posted by: Douglas De Bono   2004-09-14 10:09:57 AM  

#5  tu - Lol! You're a natural ad-man!
Posted by: .com   2004-09-14 9:18:12 AM  

#4  New from the UN! "Ethnic Cleansing"... now with "Genocide"!
Posted by: tu3031   2004-09-14 9:15:58 AM  

#3  I think that Powell's statements that Darfur is, indeed, a genocidal effort were sweet. Directly refuting the EU twinkie who said that the murder spree didn't "qualify as genocide" just a week ago.

Now, while the diplos dither over Powell's remarks, Bush will gather the steam to act - unilaterally again - and prolly follow the suggestions many have posted here.

I do so love the smell of fried bureaucrat in the morning, lol!
Posted by: .com   2004-09-14 9:14:07 AM  

#2  We'll investigate. That should teach 'em a lesson, but good!
Posted by: PlanetDan   2004-09-14 8:52:41 AM  

#1  ABC news had a story on Darfur last night. Said the US has finally recognized it as genocide! No mention of the UN at all or even the EU. Implied that the US let it happen. I almost threw a shoe through the TV. Jennings pisses me off even more than Dan "what's the frequency, Kenneth" Rather. I want to hear some wailing and gnashing of teeth when W wins.
Posted by: Spot   2004-09-14 5:06:57 AM  

00:00