Submit your comments on this article |
Home Front: WoT |
Justice Dept Overturning Convictions of Three Moslems in Detroit |
2004-09-01 |
From The Washington Post The Justice Department will ask a federal judge in Detroit to dismiss the convictions of three men in a high-profile terrorism case last year, saying it has uncovered serious prosecutorial misconduct in the case. Department lawyers have told U.S. District Judge Gerald Rosen and defense attorneys that the convictions should be thrown out because prosecutors failed to share potentially exculpatory evidence with the defense during last year's trial, legal sources said last night. The convictions of two Moroccan immigrants for conspiracy to provide material support for terrorism and of a third man on document fraud charges represented one of the government's most significant victories in the war on terrorism in the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. .... A filing from the Justice Department is expected as early as today seeking to have the convictions overturned and detailing the alleged misconduct. The department is expected to say that it will not seek reinstatement of the terrorism-related charges against defendants Karim Koubriti and Abdel-Ilah Elmardoudi but will seek to retry them and a third man, Ahmed Hannan, on document fraud charges. ...In the first terrorism-related trial since the Sept. 11 attacks, Elmardoudi, 37, of Minneapolis, and Koubriti, 26, of Detroit, were convicted in June 2003 of conspiring to provide material support to terrorists and document fraud. Hannan, 35, of Detroit was convicted of document fraud, and Farouk Ali-Haimoud, 22, of Detroit was cleared of all charges. Justice Department officials, including Attorney General John D. Ashcroft, asserted the men were in a sleeper cell associated with al Qaeda and had plans to secure weapons and attack targets in the United States and abroad. Authorities stumbled on some of the men when they raided a Detroit apartment shortly after the Sept. 11 attacks in a search for Nabil al-Marabh, who was on a terrorist watch list. They later termed the apprehension one of the most significant in the United States in the war against terrorism. |
Posted by:Mike Sylwester |
#3 It will be. I sure would like to hear from OS about this. It looks like another trumped up case with falsified evidence by the prosecution. If DOJ can't prove these guys are criminals without falsifying evidence, why should DOD treat them as enemies? |
Posted by: Mrs. Davis 2004-09-01 11:37:55 AM |
#2 Agree, anonymous. But why âoverturningâ in the title? At this point, itâs just a motion to dismiss. Has the motion been approved? |
Posted by: B 2004-09-01 10:13:11 AM |
#1 Illustrates the utter silliness of treating terrorists as criminals. |
Posted by: Anonymous6236 2004-09-01 9:04:49 AM |