You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan/South Asia
Splitting Jihad to Control it or End it?
2004-08-30
EFL
Ever since the start of the insurgency in Kashmir, the Pakistani intelligence agencies have constantly raised, mutated, emasculated and even extirpated the so-called jihadi groups active in Kashmir. The dependence of the Jihadis active in Kashmir on Pakistan for training, logistics, arms and ammunition and most of all sanctuaries, has been exploited to the hilt by the Pakistani establishment. Not only do the Pakistani agencies decide which organization will play what role in fuelling the insurgency in Kashmir, they also raise new outfits at regular intervals to ensure that none of the organizations ever get so big or powerful that they can ever pose a threat to the state. The moment a group gets too powerful or autonomous or becomes a political liability or if it strays from the line given to it by the Pakistan establishment, it is either replaced by another group or is rendered completely ineffective by withdrawing patronage. In the initial years the Pakistanis supported JKLF despite the fact that they were not comfortable with the JKLF's pro-independence ideology. But as soon as the Pakistanis managed to build up the pro-Pakistan Hizbul Mujahedin, support was withdrawn from the JKLF. The fact that the Hizbul Mujahedin was initially composed of Kashmiri's made the Pakistani establishment look for a more Pakistani alternative. This was achieved by diverting the jihadis who had fought in Afghanistan to Kashmir. There were essentially two Deobandi jihadi organisations which were ushered into waging war in Kashmir — Harkatul Jihad Islami and Harkatul Mujahedin. Because of the problems in coordinating their operations, in 1993 a merger was effected between these two Deobandi jihadis groups to form the Harkatul Ansar.
But it abducted and murdered some western tourists, causing unwanted attention...
Posted by:Paul Moloney

#3  all the evidence I see shows continued steady pressure by Pakland on the jihadis, including finally on the native groups as well the foreigners. Now as Paul and Dan have made clear its VERY complicated, and there are always groups have relatively clean hands, even if largely fronts for others, and that still have relations with parts of the Paki govt. But meanwhile the Pakis are killing or catching jihadis, and busting up apparently major AQ plots. Theyre doing a helluva lot more on this than KSA, not to mention Iran. I dont entirely trust Indian sources on this, and would remind all that AQ Khans heroic status in Pakland is in part a response to Indias nukes.
Posted by: Liberalhawk   2004-08-30 10:02:15 AM  

#2  It's the combination of Paks and Saoodis that is most dangerous. They created most of the current mess and could both end up reaping the whirlwind (with the rest of us receiving the fallout, literally as well as figuratively).
Posted by: Spot   2004-08-30 8:51:55 AM  

#1  In many ways,Pakistan is more dangerous than Iran.
Posted by: crazyhorse   2004-08-30 1:55:08 AM  

00:00