You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan/South Asia
Balochistan not NWFP the real Taliban base
2004-08-28
The real locus of the Taliban lies not in the areas of NWFP bordering Afghanistan but in Balochistan, which is nearest to the troubled provinces of Zabul, Kandahar, Helmand and Uruzgan, according to a South Asia analyst. Kaushik Kapisthalam, an Indian freelance journalist based in Atlanta, wrote in the Washington Times that Pakistan has made what would appear to be a concerted effort to clean up cross-border militant operations in the tribal areas, but "regional experts" know that this is largely a "smokescreen." He recalls that two years ago British journalist Christina Lamb managed to interview top Taliban ministers including Maulana Abdullah Sahadi, former Taliban deputy defence minister in Quetta and a year later, American journalist Scott Baldauf was not only able to speak with Taliban commander Maulvi Pardes Akhund but was allowed to observe him recruit Pakistani fighters in Quetta for cross-border attacks on American troops in Afghanistan. It follows that if General Musharraf were serious about cracking down on the Taliban, his focus should have been Balochistan, not the tribal areas.

According to Kapisthalam, Pakistan's actions are not all that of omission. A recent report quoted US intelligence officials as saying that the United States possesses satellite photos that show Pakistani army trucks picking up Taliban troops fleeing back across the border after a failed attack. Other reports have also quoted US soldiers stating that they observed Pakistani border troops provide covering fire to retreating Taliban militants after cross-border attacks on US and coalition troops in Afghanistan.

While Pakistani officials pointing out that there are millions of Afghan refuges in their country and not every black-turbaned Afghan is a Taliban agent, the argument is facile. "Nobody has asked Pakistan to round up every black-turbaned Pushtun to stop all cross-border movement. The key is the ease with which former Taliban leaders and their financiers are able to plan, organise and stage attacks on Afghan and coalition troops across the border. Afghan leaders, including President Karzai as well as US officials have handed over list after list of Taliban leaders residing in Pakistan whom they want handed over, but Pakistan has been silent," the analysis continues. So far, Kapisthalam wrote, Pakistan has not arrested even a single middle or top Taliban leader, but there has been a crackdown on journalists to prevent embarrassing exposes.

Another Pakistani tactic is to claim that the Taliban resurgence is due to the "alienation" of Pushtun Afghans because of the Tajik-dominated government in Kabul. The violence in Afghanistan, reports have said, is largely cross-border in nature, originating in Pakistan. Pakistan has so far escaped America's "wrath", thanks to those in the US administration who portray the continued Pakistani support to the Taliban as actions of "rogue" military and intelligence officials and those who are sympathetic to the "Pushtun cause." A recent book by a CIA official takes the view that the Pakistani establishment always wants to see a Taliban-like regime in Afghanistan, failing which it would want to destabilise any alternative regime in place there. According to the writer, "To the Pakistanis, only an Islamist Afghanistan would serve as a bulwark against Pushtun nationalism as well as minimise the role of regional rivals like India and Iran ... the simple but unpalatable truth for US policymakers is that the Pakistani establishment's goals for Afghanistan are exactly the opposite of what the United States wants for that strife-torn nation."
Posted by:Paul Moloney

#7  Like it 6199... Consider a name.
Posted by: Shipman   2004-08-28 5:36:53 PM  

#6  KB and NGuard- I acknowledge that these guys present info we mght not get elsewhere, a good thing. If we start recruiting reporters to do infiltration, all their lives are forfeit, another acknowledged bad thing. Ergo, they have to portray antiAmerican attitude to get the "story". My bitch is when they start believing that, and don't report, say, an attack that kills Americans or allies, so as to keep their journalistic cred.
Posted by: Frank G   2004-08-28 5:19:43 PM  

#5  Paki anti-terror policy is as follows: make a couple of show arrests to keep the American money flowing in, while maintaining their "Pakistan in Depth" policy that led to the 9-11 massacres. I would have let the Northern Alliance conduct a scorched earth policy against the Talibanis, while turning the Afghanistan-Pakistan borders into a B52 turkey shoot.
Posted by: Anonymous6199   2004-08-28 5:03:37 PM  

#4  The author of this article has a great vocabulary! "Locus" & "facile" have me reaching for my dictionary. & the revelations of this Kapisthalam are shocking to me (Pakistani soldiers providing covering fire for retreating Taliban, trucks loading up Taliban, etc.!) This article is depressing, really. Frank G: I sorta agree that Scott Baldauf is an asshole for fraternizing witht the enemy, but as N Guard points out at least he's actually doing some good investigative journalism instead of reporting live via satellite from the roof of a swanky hotel in Islamabad and just copying whatever the AP wire tells him to say about the situation, which is exactly what the other 99.99% of journalists do (just mimick the AP wire.) Besides Frank G, these reporters such as Baldauf that go out into the field freelance provide two great benefits to our country's war on terrorism: 1. it allows our government to recruit the reporters as intelligence agents or send in intelligence agents with bogus credentials and 2. our intelligence agencies get a lot of their information from open source materials, i.e. t.v., newspapers, magazines, radio, etc.
Posted by: Kentucky Beef   2004-08-28 2:39:08 PM  

#3  Journalist first, American second (or third or ....)

Mike Wallace school of AntiAmericanism Journalism
Posted by: Frank G   2004-08-28 10:08:33 AM  

#2  Easy, frank... Look at this as an opportunity to confirm our analysis. besides, he's prolly gonna get the famous Nick berg treatment if he keeps poking around there. From what i can tell he's just a reporter actualy doing his job, not just hanging out in the capital city hotel rxmiting stringer copy.
Posted by: N Guard   2004-08-28 9:56:15 AM  

#1  American journalist Scott Baldauf was not only able to speak with Taliban commander Maulvi Pardes Akhund but was allowed to observe him recruit Pakistani fighters in Quetta for cross-border attacks on American troops in Afghanistan

thanks a lot, Scott. Asshole
Posted by: Frank G   2004-08-28 9:05:56 AM  

00:00