You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
ACLU quits federal donation program
2004-08-02
Group refuses to use anti-terrorist watch list
More good news!
The American Civil Liberties Union has withdrawn from a federal donation program, refusing to follow U.S. Patriot Act rules requiring use of a government anti-terrorism watch list to check employees' names, a spokeswoman said. The ACLU stands to lose about $500,000 by pulling out of the Combined Federal Campaign, which allows federal employees to donate to various nonprofit organizations through payroll deductions, ACLU spokeswoman Emily Whitfield said Saturday. In 2003, the ACLU received $470,000 in such contributions.

ACLU Executive Director Anthony Romero, in a letter to CFC Director Mara Patermaster, said Attorney General "John Ashcroft and this administration have created a climate of fear and intimidation that undermines the health and well-being of this nation." Using the watch lists, developed under the U.S. Patriot Act, is one requirement of continued program participation. The Patriot Act -- which expires in 2005 -- was passed into law in the weeks after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. It strengthened government legal powers to conduct investigations and detain terrorists people.

Supporters of the law have said the Patriot Act has been a valuable tool in anti-terrorism efforts. The ACLU, a legal organization that works to defend individual Constitutional rights, has long opposed the U.S. Patriot Act. In his letter, Romero said, "We will act not only on our behalf, but on behalf of our nation's nonprofits, to defend ourselves against John Ashcroft and a government that tramples on the Constitution in the name of national security."
You can just see the spittle on his chin.
Posted by:Steve White

#7  Sounds to me that the ACLU wants to be able to hire terrorists, criminals, etc... who are on this 'watch list'.

I agree the ACLU should loose its 'non-profit' status.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2004-08-02 10:07:52 AM  

#6  John Ashcroft and this administration have created a climate of fear...

Ooohhhhhhhhhh. Climate of fear!
Brrrrrrrrrrr!
Posted by: tu3031   2004-08-02 9:50:59 AM  

#5  In the CFC, participants get to designate where their contributions go. So any money that went to the ACLU was designated by those making the contribution (folks can, of course, make contributions directly, so I don't see the ACLU funding dropping off all that much).
There are tons of charities on the CFC list, some national, some local. I select local and/or Christian ones that have low overhead - more bang for the buck.
Posted by: Spot   2004-08-02 9:28:45 AM  

#4  The ACLU is the legal arm that sabotages our nation's values by manipulating legal loopholes and making a mockery of our constitution. Of course the ACLU is as bad as its benefactors,#3. The ACLU is the terror from within. The Ford Foundation gives grants to alot of organizations, but none of them undermine our country's foundation to as great as an extent as the ACLU lawyers. I'm not sure what "obvious" point you were trying to make.
Posted by: rex   2004-08-02 1:41:45 AM  

#3  rex, the ACLU's not nearly as bad as the Ford Foundation or its grantees, just to name the most obvious example...
Posted by: someone   2004-08-02 1:25:41 AM  

#2  The ACLU should not have non-profit standing. If Bush wins in November, he needs to get Ashcroft working on stripping the ACLU of its non-profit status. As a taxpayer, I'm very annoyed that an anti-American anarchist organization like the ACLU is getting tax bereaks. Let them pay for their own activities-don't expect the taxpayer to supplement their budget-I feel soiled whenever the ACLU takes a case to court-it's like taxpayers are co-partners in its seditious actions.
Posted by: rex   2004-08-02 1:03:43 AM  

#1  In his letter, Romero said, "We will act not only on our behalf, but on behalf of our nation's nonprofits, to defend ourselves against John Ashcroft and a government that tramples on the Constitution in the name of national security."

I don't know which is worse. The ACLU complaints about Ashcroft's 'trampling' of the Constitution in the name of national security or the ACLU trampling on the Constitution in the name of a socialist agenda.
Posted by: badanov   2004-08-02 12:55:48 AM  

00:00