| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Politix |
| Washington Post's only Bergler article today has an obvious anti Bush spin |
| 2004-07-23 |
| EFL - yesterday, the Post had a straight factual news article; today, its all anti Bush spin More Revelations in Berger Inquiry Wider Circle in Administration Claims Prior Knowledge of Probe By Mike Allen and John F. Harris Washington Post Staff Writers Friday, July 23, 2004; Page A08 For the second day in a row, administration officials said yesterday that more of President Bush's aides knew about an investigation of former Clinton national security adviser Samuel R. "Sandy" Berger than the White House originally acknowledged... |
| Posted by:mhw |
| #3 It seems to me that democracy can only work if we can trust one another to at least deal in good faith;.. Good faith and a large majority of today's Left are completely incompatible. They're remarkably similar to Arab terrorist organizations; any good faith gesture by the opposition is perceived as weakness and is to be taken advantage of appropriately, the end aim being the acquisition of power, with little or no regard to the consequences of their methods. |
| Posted by: Bomb-a-rama 2004-07-23 12:04:20 PM |
| #2 Only in America can a Democrat commit a crime and it's the fault of a Republican. Good thing not everyone is as stupid as the LLL press. I can't find a single Democrat in my office (and there are tons) that wants to defend the 'Begerliar'. these are people who still think Clinton DID NOT lie. |
| Posted by: Cyber Sarge (VRWC CA Chapter) 2004-07-23 11:19:58 AM |
| #1 See? See? SEE?? BUSH KNEW ALL ALONG!!!!!!!!!! [/clueless] So f*cking what? Are these reporters so stupid they actually think that's the issue? Or are they so arrogant they think the American people are dumb enough to believe them when they concoct a "Bush Knew" scandal that doesn't even make sense? It's one thing for the press to be biased; I can both understand and forgive bias. After all, we each have our own point of view, and our own catalog of things we've internalized as fundamental truths. I don't expect reporters to be perfectly logical, perfectly neutral, utterly disinterested spectators of the events they report: to demand that would be to demand more than I myself could deliver, were I in their position. But this isn't bias; this is outright dishonesty, deceptiveness, and collusion between "news" reporters and the Democratic Party. Where is all this going to lead? Sometimes I wonder if these assholes have sense enough to refrain from the kinds of abuses that someone, someday, might decide can only be solved by internment camps. It seems to me that democracy can only work if we can trust one another to at least deal in good faith; when we can no longer trust in that, the whole thing is in danger of crashing down around our feet. I think we're close to that now. |
| Posted by: Dave D. 2004-07-23 9:06:50 AM |