You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Europe
NYT: US to Invade Greece with Armed Troops
2004-07-21
Under intense pressure from the United States, Greece will allow 400 American Special Forces soldiers to be present at the Olympic Games next month under NATO auspices and will also permit American, Israeli and possibly British security officers to carry weapons, Greek and American officials said.
Seems like a lot of troops, unless they have reason to suspect something. How many carriers do we have in the Med within strike distance of Athens?
Not really, 3 shifts, 24/7 coverage, lots of venues, lots of atheletes, 400 is kind of light.
The delicate arrangements, which the officials say will not be formally acknowledged for fear of roiling anti-American sentiment, represent a significant departure from Olympic tradition, as well as from Greek law, which prohibits foreign personnel from carrying weapons within the country. Until now, the only nation known to have armed its security forces at the Olympics is Israel, whose agents have been carrying arms largely without prior approval from host countries since 1972, when Black September, a Palestinian group, killed Israeli athletes and officials in the Olympic Village in Munich.
But wait, there's more!
Posted by:Mr. Davis

#15  Related article I saw last night noted that virtually no country, including the US, allows foreign agents on its soil to be armed

Tell that to Kofi Anan, who for years flouted US and NY law to keep armed guards of his own in NYC. After 9/11 that finally got squelched, but it went on for a good while ....
Posted by: rkb   2004-07-21 8:56:24 PM  

#14  Related article I saw last night noted that virtually no country, including the US, allows foreign agents on its soil to be armed

Tell that to Kofi Anan, who for years flouted US and NY law to keep armed guards of his own in NYC. After 9/11 that finally got squelched, but it went on for a good while ....
Posted by: rkb   2004-07-21 8:54:09 PM  

#13  Let the Greek security aparati deal with this.... it'll be way easier to deal with any outcome.

Yes, much easier on diplomatic relations having the body-bags loaded on the plane with 'Deep Regret' by the host nation, instead of them being po'ed because no one with experience trusts them to keep the athletes safe.

/cynical observation
Posted by: Pappy   2004-07-21 8:19:26 PM  

#12  The official Greek position is that no foreign police or security forces will be allowed to carry weapons because it is forbidden by the Greek Constitution

I think that's incorrect. There's a provision in the Constitution that foreign troops can't pass through Greece without the Parliament voting in a law giving them permission -- but I don't believe there's anything forbidding presence of armed personnel in general.
Posted by: Aris Katsaris   2004-07-21 8:17:14 PM  

#11  I think this is asking for trouble. Let the Greek security aparati deal with this.... it'll be way easier to deal with any outcome.
Posted by: Shipman   2004-07-21 2:27:00 PM  

#10  They're not armed troops, they're armed driving instructors. You Greeks be sure to drive under the speed limit and wave real friendly when you pass, ya hear now?
Posted by: ed   2004-07-21 2:05:27 PM  

#9  And before we jump on Greece and her security problem,would there be any differ if Olympics were being held in Spain,France,Belgium,Italy,Egypt,Mexico,etc.?
Actually, I always felt WAY safer in Spain, than I did in Greece. The Guadia Civil is not a police force to be messed with, not if you want to live long and die of old age in bed.
There is no nice way to say this--- Greek law enforcement made the Keystone Cops look like Scotland yard. Perhaps they have gotten better since 1984, but I wouldn't bet my life on it.
Posted by: Sgt. Mom   2004-07-21 1:25:24 PM  

#8  If so, Steve, should we forgive Greek "recalcitrance" on the subject?
Posted by: Edward Yee   2004-07-21 12:51:38 PM  

#7  Related article I saw last night noted that virtually no country, including the US, allows foreign agents on its soil to be armed. For the Atlanta Olympics the Israelis had armed guards protecting their atheletes -- strictly illegal in the US, but we looked the other way. Ditto for the Sydney Olympics.

I suspect this is exactly the situation in Athens -- the Greeks understand that certain countries are at increased risk and will allow those countries to provide extra, armed protection, but no one's supposed to acknowledge it or talk about it. That way everyone saves face.
Posted by: Steve White   2004-07-21 11:06:33 AM  

#6  W/deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan still going on,400 SF troops sounds a bit high.400 may be the "official" negotiated figure for all armed Americans based IN Greece-FBI,Secret Service,etc.(A ship 15 miles off coast could have as many as US-or others-wanted.) And the potential for chaos does seem high.(Suppose-bus w/American,British,Canadian athletes gets hi-jacked near Piraeus.Delta,Seals and FBI HRT are all going to fight over who has right to attempt hostage rescue,even as Greece,US,Brits and Canada argue over negotiating or rescue and if rescue,who should make attempt-a 6 ring free-for-all between Greek military,Greek police,the 3 US groups and Brits' SAS team that"just happened to have its eqipment at Embassy".I have a hunch French,German,Brit and Aussie Embassies have all received several large crates recently,along w/alot of healthy temp workers.)I get the feeling US protection is going to just be for dignitaries and the mens' basketball team.

And before we jump on Greece and her security problem,would there be any differ if Olympics were being held in Spain,France,Belgium,Italy,Egypt,Mexico,etc.?Still haven't decided if Islamic nuts are going to strike at Olympics.
Posted by: Stephen   2004-07-21 11:03:02 AM  

#5  Cyber Sarge,

Credit me with going overboard on the headline, not the Times.
Posted by: Mr. Davis   2004-07-21 10:27:21 AM  

#4  Only the times wqould characterize the protection of our people as an 'invasion.' When did the editor of Pravda get hired on as the editor? Thank you to the Greek Goverment for allowing us to provide the extra need protection. Efkaristo, Feelos. God help them if they try to pull some Munich type raid.
Posted by: Cyber Sarge   2004-07-21 10:16:18 AM  

#3  Article: The official Greek position is that no foreign police or security forces will be allowed to carry weapons because it is forbidden by the Greek Constitution

Do they also have something in there about letting terrorists roam free, as long as they only attack foreigners?
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2004-07-21 9:40:56 AM  

#2  "Several NATO countries were opposed". Hmmmm...could I guess - France! and associated foreign satellites of Belgium and Luxemburg?
Posted by: Don   2004-07-21 9:16:58 AM  

#1  BBC has a different story:
Greece says national Olympic teams will not be allowed to bring their own armed security guards to the Games. The country's public order minister said state leaders could take armed guards but Greece alone would protect international athletes.
"Leaders, presidents, kings are one thing and athletes are another," George Voulgarakis said.
"Greece is exclusively responsible for the protection and guarding of the athletes."
A report by the New York Times suggested Greece had reached a tacit agreement with the US to allow armed American agents to act as bodyguards for their athletes. But Mr Voulgarakis denied this.

Posted by: Steve   2004-07-21 9:15:17 AM  

00:00