You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Europe
Italian intelligence taking al-Qaeda threats seriously
2004-07-17
Italian intelligence is taking recent Al Qaeda threats addressed against Italy extremely seriously. Intelligence reports a rise in activity concerning websites connected with the July 15 deadline set by Bin Laden for Westerners to leave Iraq. Based on prior analysis of the Saudi sheik's behavioural patterns intelligence believe the message is a go-ahead for jihad factions to act. The aim is hence to create expectation which translates into generalised panic and a high onus on security forces. The threat according to intelligence is real and has to be taken seriously. There is no clean cut idea as to what the threats refer to, intelligence are merely aware of a general Al Qaeda threat of a grand attack against the infidels. Targets are mush the same as they have always been: European capitals - including Rome, especially after the fall of what many considered as being the Vatican's "protective shield", ill spent as a result of the meeting between the Pope and George Bush -, soldiers in Iraq, Western concerns worldwide as well as Islamic countries with high western tourist influx. Bin Laden has always targeted moderate Arab or Islamic countries in an attempt to swell the tide of fundamentalist unrest.
Posted by:Dan Darling

#3  It would seem that if violence happens to Rome and/or the Vatican it would only be fair and proper to have a policy stating that the response would inflict a factor of 10 worse upon another religion's holy sites....and that the members of said religion of peace should understand that it would all be Al Qaeda's fault.
Posted by: 3dc   2004-07-17 10:51:16 PM  

#2  The theory was that the Vatican was 'safe' because of its actions, or lack thereof, in Gaza (remember the militants taking over the church?), and its opposition to armed-intervention in Iraq.

Personally, I'd like to know exactly who the author meant by 'many'.
Posted by: Pappy   2004-07-17 10:42:22 PM  

#1  Targets...including Rome, especially after the fall of what many considered as being the Vatican’s "protective shield"

Dan, this part of the article seems muddled to me. Can you clarify what the author probably meant, since its seems intended to be a critical point?

Thanks loads!
Posted by: trailing wife   2004-07-17 9:25:17 PM  

00:00