You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Kerry Backs Much of Pre-Emption Doctrine
2004-07-16
Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry said Friday he would be willing to launch a pre-emptive strike against terrorists if he had adequate intelligence of a threat. Kerry offered some support for one of the most controversial aspects of President Bush's national security policy, even as he criticized the president for not reforming intelligence agencies after the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. "Am I prepared as president to go get them before they get us if we locate them and have the sufficient intelligence? You bet I am," he said at a news conference at his Washington headquarters.
anything to gain power...again
The Bush administration laid out the doctrine of pre-emption months before the Iraq (news - web sites) war began in March 2003. It argued that the United States cannot rely on its vast arsenal to deter attacks and must be willing to strike first against potential threats. Critics of the policy say the Iraq war shows how the country could be driven to war by flawed intelligence. Kerry said the intelligence needs to be improved so that the word of a U.S. president "is good enough for people across the world again." But he added, "I will never allow any other country to veto what we need to do and I will never allow any other institution to veto what we need to do to protect our nation." ballicks
Kerry spoke one week after the Senate Intelligence Committee sharply criticized prewar intelligence on whether Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction. The report did not address Bush's role, but Kerry said, "as commander in chief, the president of the United States must take responsibility for what happens on his or her watch." The four-term Massachusetts senator said that nearly three years after the Sept. 11 attacks, "this president has not taken action sufficient to fix the intelligence problems that have plagued us." Outlining his own proposals, Kerry repeated his call for creating a director of central intelligence who would oversee all facets of the nation's intelligence operations.
That's the function of the DCI — which is in fact the Director of Central Intelligence.
Posted by:Mark Espinola

#6  I can see it now: "Ï was for pre-emption before I was against it".
Posted by: Ol_Dirty_American   2004-07-16 7:08:07 PM  

#5  "I will never allow any other country to veto what we need to do and I will never allow any other institution to veto what we need to do to protect our nation."

I was for requiring U.N. support for going to war before I was against it......
Posted by: CrazyFool   2004-07-16 6:37:47 PM  

#4  If Kerry backs a lot of the basic idea of pre-emption, what would be the point of putting the guy in the Oval Office then? It would be just like having GWB there, but with even MORE spending, HIGHER taxes, and even BIGGER government.
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2004-07-16 6:00:51 PM  

#3  Anybody getting whiplash?
Posted by: jules 187   2004-07-16 5:53:44 PM  

#2  Lotta "ifs" in his statement, too. Always an out for the senator.
Posted by: eLarson   2004-07-16 5:48:16 PM  

#1  Why does anyone breathlessly report what someone says they would do / or would have done differently? It's all just hot air until you're in the big chair - taking the heat from all sides and making so few of the harpies truly happy.

"I promise a snazzy new car in every garage, a chicken (range or regular, your choice) in every pot, and a pony in every backyard - which will be at least 3 acres in size! Vote for meeeee!"

Pfeh.
Posted by: .com   2004-07-16 5:42:39 PM  

00:00