You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Africa: Horn
Sudan agrees to demands to stop violence
2004-07-02
Sudan has agreed to act to stop violence and facilitate relief work in its western Darfur region following visits and the threat of limited sanctions by Colin Powell, US secretary of state, and Kofi Annan, UN secretarygeneral. Diplomats said a draft resolution would be put to the Security Council if Khartoum failed to act on its commitments. But they conceded any sanctions would be completely largely a waste of time symbolic.
But symbolic is what the UN is best at, right?
Mr Powell, accompanied by Sudanese thugocrats officials, visited the Abu Shouk camp, where 40,000 black African villagers are sheltering after being driven from their homes by the Arab Janjaweed militia. Some aid workers called it a "show camp" and Mr Powell said he knew conditions were far worse elsewhere, including areas plagued by famine.

Mr Powell said the Sudanese government had agreed to a list of actions to be taken "in the very near future", including a specific commitment to use the police and military "more aggressively" to deal with the militia. "Words alone are not enough," Mr Powell said, calling on the government which has been accused of aiding the militia to "break the back" of Janjaweed. He said Khartoum had also agreed to ease all restrictions on visas for humanitarian workers, make sure relief convoys and monitors had access and to "get immediately involved in the political process".

In an interview with National Public Radio, Mr Powell also disclosed that Bush administration legal advisers had come to the conclusion that, based on the evidence available, the violence directed against Darfur's African tribes by Arab militia "does not meet the tests of the definition of genocide". He rejected comparisons with the genocide against Rwanda's Tutsi minority in 1994. "This is not Rwanda 10 years ago. It is Sudan now," he said.
I just hope he has a good reason for saying this now, as in, the deal for the southern peace isn't done yet.
Washington has come under pressure from human rights groups to declare the wave of killings, rape and expulsions as genocide, a move that would lead to sanctions against the Sudanese government. Sudan refuses to acknowledge the gravity of the humanitarian crisis. After a meeting in Khartoum on Tuesday evening with President Omar Hassan al- Bashir, a US official was quoted as saying Sudanese authorities were still criminals "in a state of denial".
Posted by:Steve White

#9  You have a low opinion of Americans. Why?
Posted by: jules 187   2004-07-02 4:51:14 PM  

#8  right. but not before dragging our feet in the dirt or ignoring it as much as possible without looking bad
Posted by: Dcreeper   2004-07-02 4:23:06 PM  

#7  Actually, Dcreeper, we are usually the only ones making sacrifices to help others, with a few laudable exceptions like Britain, Australia, Poland, Italy...

It isn't for show, as many soldiers in Army hospitals can attest. We have values; it is most of the rest of the world which only wants to APPEAR to have them, without actually ever moving to help.
Posted by: jules 187   2004-07-02 4:07:38 PM  

#6  because doing more than negotiating would mean we would actaully have to make a personal sacrifice on the behalf of others...

and who wants to do that ?

almost nobody

so we talk and pretend to have values, for our image and pride

eventually it becomes obvious that we are doing nothing and it becomes needful to send forces(or look bad), but for now... delay delay delay

pessmistic, but is there any other explanation that fits past and present behavior?
Posted by: Dcreeper   2004-07-02 3:42:38 PM  

#5  Sudan has agreed to act to stop violence and facilitate relief work.

Just by uttering these words, Sudan is implicated as having allowed violence and blocked relief work before.

Why are we still negotiating with scum?
Posted by: jules 187   2004-07-02 11:33:36 AM  

#4  Just checked a map...
Yep, De Nial does indeed run through the Soudan.
They gots De Blue Nial, De White Nial and just plain De Nial, Yep.

(ducks for cover! :) )
Posted by: N Guard   2004-07-02 11:32:35 AM  

#3  And now we enter the phase of malign benign neglect.

Decap the Sudanese government right now. What's the harm?
Posted by: Zenster   2004-07-02 10:08:25 AM  

#2  Yep, we'll get right on that. Sure will. Anything else you need?
Are they gone yet?
Posted by: Sudan   2004-07-02 8:57:36 AM  

#1  That's mighty white of the Sudanese Arabs. Since the warfare/pillaging is phase is complete; now starvation, thirst and disease will take the real toll.
Posted by: ed   2004-07-02 1:47:30 AM  

00:00