CIA had "less than a handful" of sources in prewar Iraq and could not get access to suspected weapons programs, the departing head of the agency’s spy service has said. "As some critics have claimed, during the pre-war period, we did not have many Iraq sources. We certainly did not have enough," James Pavitt, CIA deputy director for operations, said in a speech to the Foreign Policy Association. "Until we put people on the ground in northern Iraq, we had less than a handful," said Pavitt on Monday, who has announced plans to retire in August.
| No quiver on my digital surprise meter. |
He said the CIA was unable to gain access to the "heart of Saddam’s weapons programs." But in the months before the war the agency got closer to the political and military inner circles and collected intelligence the U.S. military found vital when it entered Iraq, he said. The CIA’s presence in Iraq is now the largest anywhere since the Vietnam War, Pavitt said.
| Hmmm... Gimme some time. I'll figure out why... |
The United States had faced difficulties recruiting Iraqi spies before the war because potential sources were fearful of retribution from Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein and wary of the U.S. commitment to overthrow him, Pavitt said. "You cannot recruit spies in a vacuum," he said. "The decade before was a time when on the one hand we were saying quietly we needed to overthrow Saddam, on the other hand we weren’t saying that with any great vigor publicly." He said the CIA had nothing to do with misleading information given to the Pentagon by Iraqi defectors and refugees linked to exile groups intent on overthrowing Saddam. "Those controversial spies, if you will, were not my spies."
| "They were Tenet's spies, every one!" |
The threat from al Qaeda remains nearly three years after the September 11, 2001 attacks on New York and Washington, he said. "Al Qaeda has unambiguous plans to hit the homeland again, and New York City, I am certain, remains a prime target." U.S. efforts against al Qaeda have inflicted "irrevocable damage" on parts of the network, but it has "poisoned an international movement" fueling attacks around the world, Pavitt said. "We’ve got to realize that the war we are in is one which in my mind has no end in sight." Pavitt described as unwarranted and ill-informed some of the criticisms leveled at the CIA, and denied charges the agency has a risk-averse culture. He cited successes such as finding Saddam’s sons, who were then killed by U.S. forces. He credited a CIA officer in Iraq "who dealt with a nervous, jumpy intelligence volunteer who promised, and delivered, the location of Uday and Qusay Hussein."
| That was a good day, wasn't it? |
|