| Submit your comments on this article |
| Africa: Horn |
| WND: Sudanese Christian woman whipped under Sharia Law |
| 2004-06-17 |
| EFL - Sudan proves they are a still a little hazy on the whole natural human rights paradigm. Public-order police under Sudan’s Islamist regime fined and whipped a Christian woman for not wearing a headcovering in 100-degree heat. Cecilia John Holland, 27, was on a bus heading to her suburban Khartoum home April 13 when about 10 police officers forced the vehicle to stop and dragged her from it, according to the British-based charity Barnabas Fund. The group said Holland was dressed modestly in long sleeves and an ankle-length skirt. The policemen struck her while forcing her into their vehicle where four other women already were inside, the British charity said. She was held overnight at the police station. The next morning, Holland was taken to Sizana Islamic Court where the Muslim policemen testified against her. She was not allowed to make a statement or speak in her own defense. How much difference is their really between the Sudanese governemnt and the Taliban? The court declared her guilty of charges she was "standing near a garden at night" and not wearing a scarf on her head. Kind of makes the Massachusetts Blue Laws look pretty tame. She was sentenced to 40 lashes on the back and a fine of 10,000 dinars, the equivalent of a month’s wage. Authorities released her that afternoon after being whipped and paying the fine. Earlier in April, the government had renewed its insistence that all Sudanese citizens residing in Khartoum would be under Islamic law. Barnabas noted Holland is one of more than 2 million non-Muslim southerners in the capital area who have been displaced as a result of the 21-year civil war between the mainly Arab Muslim north and the mainly African Christian and animist south, which has been fighting Khartoum’s imposition of Islamic law. Holland, who has paler skin because of a Europeoan grandparent, might have been mistaken for an Arab Muslim, but the British group says her name and accent should have proved her Christian and southern Sudanese identity. Police reportedly told her no one, "not even a non-Muslim" was exempt from the Islamic dress code. |
| Posted by:Super Hose |
| #6 Perspective: It's not much different than the Victorian Era's "well-turned ankle..." It's those 'crinkly' bits that cause 'em to lose it... |
| Posted by: .com 2004-06-17 4:01:57 PM |
| #5 They are so terrified of their own sexual weakness and lack of self-control that they must remove ANY FEMALE SKIN from sight-eyelids, fingertips, heels, all of it. If they can't remove it from their sight via sharia law and it somehow does manifest anyway, then they remove that offending female skin with the lash. Such brave, brave men. |
| Posted by: Zenster 2004-06-17 3:31:28 PM |
| #4 Have you ever heard of a people as chronically afflicted with sexual repression and shame as the sharia folks? They are so terrified of their own sexual weakness and lack of self-control that they must remove ANY FEMALE SKIN from sight-eyelids, fingertips, heels, all of it. How can people so obsessed with humiliation in the world's eyes not see that this hypervigilant sexual neutering makes them a laughing stock. It's a wonder they have children at all... |
| Posted by: jules 187 2004-06-17 10:30:33 AM |
| #3 Would someone please remind me why merely offing the entire Sudanese government while it is in session is such a bad idea? One solid cruise missile launch might tend to quiet down these overeager Islamic do-gooders. |
| Posted by: Zenster 2004-06-17 3:55:12 AM |
| #2 Police reportedly told her no one, "not even a non-Muslim" was exempt from the Islamic dress code. Good thing to keep in mind when someone, somewhere, makes a push for implementation of Sharia. |
| Posted by: Bomb-a-rama 2004-06-17 2:10:17 AM |
| #1 Nice to see she wasn't stoned. Moderates, may god bless them. |
| Posted by: Lucky 2004-06-17 1:19:29 AM |