You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq-Jordan
Sadr breaks truce, seizes An Najafi police station
2004-06-10
Shiite gunmen seized a police station Thursday in Najaf in the first outbreak of fighting since an agreement to end weeks of bloody clashes between U.S. troops and militia forces. Four Iraqis were killed and 13 were injured, hospital and militia officials said.
It's a hudna tradition...
Gunmen loyal to radical cleric Muqtada al-Sadr took control of the Ghari police station just 250 yards from the Imam Ali Shrine, witness Mohammed Hussein said. The station was looted and police cars were burned. "We sent a quick-reaction unit to assist the policemen defending the station, but they were overwhelmed by al-Sadr fighters," Najaf Gov. Adnan al-Zurufi said. "We will solve this problem as soon as possible. We will ask for the help of the Americans, if necessary." U.S. forces were not involved in the clashes, and it was unclear whether the violence marked the end of the cease-fire in Najaf, mediated by Shiite leaders and al-Sadr’s militia, or resulted from police attempts to crack down on petty crime in the city.
I heard on the radio that it was in reponse to the cops arresting some crooks, at which point their fellow tribals hollered "Hey, Rube" and the festivities were under way...
Police and witnesses said trouble started when authorities tried to arrest some suspected thieves at the bus station near the main police headquarters. Masked attackers — possibly including militia members — responded with machine gun fire and rocket-propelled grenades near the headquarters building. One gunman was killed when police returned fire, and other fighters then attacked the building. Fighting later moved to the second police station. Al-Sadr spokesman Qais al-Khazali said he was trying to intervene and stop the violence.
"I'm important! They'll listen to me!"
"We are trying to convince them to stop shooting," al-Khazali said. "We are still committed to the truce." Two of the four dead were al-Mahdi fighters, and several others were injured, al-Khazali said.
Gee. Golly. Wonder how they got mixed in with the crooks?
In a sign of the ongoing threat, saboteurs blew up a key oil pipeline Wednesday, forcing a 10 percent cut on the national power grid as demand for electricity rises with the advent of Iraq’s broiling summer heat. The pipeline blast near Beiji, 150 miles north of Baghdad, was the latest in a series of attacks by insurgents against infrastructure targets, possibly to shake public confidence as a new Iraqi government prepares to take power June 30.

Barham Salih, 44, of the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan and an American favorite, announced Wednesday he would not accept the post of deputy prime minister for national security unless the powers were spelled out "appropriate to the position, sacrifice and important role of the Kurdish people," the PUK’s KurdSat television reported.

Following U.N. Security Council approval of the Iraq resolution, President Bush suggested a wider role for NATO in Iraq. However, French President Jacques Chirac raised objections, and the proposal lacks universal support in the Western alliance, already tied down by heavy commitments in Afghanistan. At the Group of Eight summit at Sea Island, Georgia, Chirac told reporters that, while he is "open to all discussion" on a NATO role, "I won’t hide it from you that I don’t think it is NATO’s purpose to intervene in Iraq." Chirac said NATO involvement "could only be envisaged" if the Iraqi government requested it.
Posted by:Dan Darling

#13  If a militia refuses to disband and persists in engaging in violence, then there is no reason not to pursue and eliminate every single member

I can think of one reason. Hint: November 2nd.
Posted by: Rafael   2004-06-10 11:47:47 PM  

#12  Al-Sadr will certainly be the focal fecal point in time, smn. Heh heh.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2004-06-10 11:26:01 PM  

#11  smn, I'm more inclined that in time he will be the aim point.
Posted by: RWV   2004-06-10 11:09:48 PM  

#10  You just gotta love this guy (Al Sadr)! He consistent, direct, and fearless! I can't wait for the Handover to occur (with him alive), so that he can fulfill his destiny. He WILL BE the focal point in time.
Posted by: smn   2004-06-10 8:42:28 PM  

#9  I know that it's been said ad nauseum, but I am compelled to ask why, other than an unhealthy desire on the part of our media elites to french kiss Chirac's backside, does anyone in this country want to know what France thinks about anything? To paraphrase a current T-shirt, "If it absolutely has to be f****d-up overnight, send the French."
Posted by: RWV   2004-06-10 3:21:17 PM  

#8   "We will solve this problem as soon as possible. We will ask for the help of the Americans, if necessary."

I would hope that this doesn't include negotiation. That would leave everything in place for possible future problems.

Al-Sadr spokesman Qais al-Khazali said he was trying to intervene and stop the violence.

Enough already. If a militia refuses to disband and persists in engaging in violence, then there is no reason not to pursue and eliminate every single member, including the leaders. If such an operation requires U.S participation, then hop to it and let's get the job done.
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2004-06-10 2:59:12 PM  

#7  He actually has people left?

We're slipping.
Posted by: Anonymous5184   2004-06-10 2:03:31 PM  

#6  The interesting bit about this though is that US soldiers were not involved. That is a wonderful thing. The Iraqi police/armed forces are fighting their own and dealing, at least fifully, with the problem. A major step forward. Oh, one more thing, Chirac can go stuff himself.
Posted by: remote man   2004-06-10 11:58:28 AM  

#5  Too bad we can't get the French to back Al-Sadar. They could just hoist the white flag for him and we could be done with it.
Posted by: B   2004-06-10 10:22:15 AM  

#4  Just couldn't help himself, could he? He seethed and seethed, seethed some more, and then exploded in anger, again. How humiliating. Dude needs to try yoga...or cyanide Valium.
Posted by: Seafarious   2004-06-10 10:11:16 AM  

#3  technically France never pulled out of the Atlantic Alliance, just the NATO command structure. And they reentered the NATO command structure under Mitterand. So, yes, they can veto NATO ops. Clinton and Blair and Joska Fischer had to work hard on them to get French support for the Kosovo operation.

Of course if Chirac vetoes NATO participation this time, that will lead to US disillusionment with NATO. Something that the new NATO states cant be very happy with. So there are prospects for major pressure on Chirac. But once again, hes not making it easy.
Posted by: Liberalhawk   2004-06-10 10:09:42 AM  

#2   President Bush (news - web sites) suggested a wider role for NATO (news - web sites) in Iraq. However, French President Jacques Chirac raised objections,....

Is this typical Gallic cheek? France pulled out of NATO years ago and they think they can give orders where NATO is concerned?
Posted by: Cynic   2004-06-10 10:04:12 AM  

#1  How many times do we have to say it-a person's word in that part of the world is MEANINGLESS. When we go in with expectations that they will honor a promise, we hoist our own petards.
Posted by: jules 187   2004-06-10 9:52:42 AM  

00:00