You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
CBS asks whether 9/11 was Reagans Fault
2004-06-09
EFL from MRC
9/11: Reagan’s fault? CBS was first out of the blocks Monday night with a story on “blemishes” in Ronald Reagan’s record as President, but instead of an even-handed review of Iran/Contra, Dan Rather and Bill Plante painted it in the most ominous light, implying that it somehow led to “the rise of Islamic fundamentalism.” Rather asked: “Is or is not America still paying a price for what’s called the Iran/Contra debacle?” Plante answered in the affirmative: “An arms control agreement with the Soviet Union refurbished President Reagan’s image, but U.S. efforts to deal with the tough issues in the Middle East went on hold, helping to set the stage for the first Iraq war and the rise of Islamic fundamentalism.” Plante justified his conclusion by claiming Iran/Contra meant that “relations with Iran deteriorated further” and “Iraq, which the Reagan administration had backed in its war against Iran, went on to use chemical weapons in 1988 with little protest from the U.S.” So the 9/11 terrorist attack on the U.S. AND Saddam Hussein using chemical weapons are both Reagan’s fault?

Before an ad break on the June 7 CBS Evening News, Rather plugged the upcoming “Reality Check” on Reagan’s legacy: “Straight ahead now on the CBS Evening News, President Reagan and the missiles-for-Iran deal. Is or is not America still paying a price for what’s called the Iran/Contra debacle?” Rather set up the subsequent story: “Ronald Reagan was and is one of the most popular Presidents in U.S. history, and with good reason: He accomplished a lot. That does not mean his record is without questions and, in fact, blemishes. Tonight, CBS’s Bill Plante, who covered the Reagan White House, begins a week-long series assessing the Reagan legacy.”
Plante began: “The most serious crisis of Ronald Reagan’s two terms, and the lowest point in his popularity, came after the revelation that his administration had secretly sold arms to Iran and turned over the profits to rebels fighting the Marxist government of Nicaragua.”
Plante, in Reagan era press conference: “Did you make a mistake in sending arms to Tehran, sir?”
Ronald Reagan: “No, and I’m not taking any more questions-”
Plante: “Reagan’s national security staff approached Iran in an effort to free American hostages being held in Lebanon, despite a vow that the administration would never negotiate with terrorists. At first, President Reagan denied that it had happened.”

Reagan, in November 13, 1986 speech from Oval Office: “We did not, repeat, did not trade weapons, or anything else, for hostages.”

Plante: “But two investigations showed that Mr. Reagan had, in fact, signed off on the weapons shipments, and in early 1987 he reversed his denial.”

Edmund Morris, Reagan biographer, clip #1: “It is, without question, a crisis brought through his own fault.”

Morris, clip #2: “And the public perceived him, therefore, as somebody who couldn’t see his own actions in a negative light.”

Plante: “The fallout was severe, softened only by the President’s willingness to accept personal responsibility.”

Condoleezza Rice, National Security Advisor: “President Reagan understood that this had happened in his administration. He was straightforward in having it investigated by the Tower Commission, they made changes. And that’s the way that we have to deal with any difficulties.”

Plante: “The President’s full disclosure at home, however, didn’t salvage U.S. policy in the Middle East. Relations with Iran deteriorated further. Iraq, which the Reagan administration had backed in its war against Iran, went on to use chemical weapons in 1988 with little protest from the U.S.”

Jon Alterman, Mideast analyst: “When it came time to really having partnerships and policies that move forward in the Middle East, there wasn’t a lot positive happening on the ground.”

Plante concluded: “An arms control agreement with the Soviet Union refurbished President Reagan’s image, but U.S. efforts to deal with the tough issues in the Middle East went on hold, helping to set the stage for the first Iraq war and the rise of Islamic fundamentalism. Bill Plante, CBS News.”
Posted by:Super Hose

#11  I blame Thomas Jefferson since he sent the Marines in against the Barbary pirates in, what, 1785?
Yar!
Posted by: tu3031   2004-06-09 11:20:05 PM  

#10  I'm with Dan. I thought the Iran/Contra deal was a win/win and still do. 'Debacle' my arse!
Posted by: Phil B   2004-06-09 6:40:55 PM  

#9  Dan-
Righto! We encouraged Iraq and Iran to take out their expansionist bloodthirst on each other instead of decimating the rest of the ME. Darn smart realpolitik at it's best.
Posted by: Craig   2004-06-09 2:51:44 PM  

#8  If it wasn't for JAG I would not watch CBS at all.
Posted by: Cyber Sarge (VRWC CA Chapter)   2004-06-09 2:10:45 PM  

#7  personally i did not see a problem with iran/contra deal...we rippped off the iranians for millions, which allowed them to kill bathists, gave the money to anti-marxist rebels which helped boot the sandinista's from power and had our people released...and remember the majority of hostages were taken before and not after this deal....
Posted by: Dan   2004-06-09 12:40:22 PM  

#6  I haven't had much use for CBS since I realized that Walter Cronkite shamelessly abused his position as "the most trusted man in America" to shill for the Democrats. He was the best they had. It's been all downhill since.
Posted by: RWV   2004-06-09 12:24:25 PM  

#5  The only "blemish" that could even be remotely connected to 9/11/2001 is the pullout following the Marine barracks bombing, and that's only one event out of many that convinced Binny that we didn't have the stomach for a fight. Iran-contra was just a sideshow.
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2004-06-09 10:44:47 AM  

#4  Damnit, .com, you left out the black helicopters, the Illuminati, Lee Harvey Oswald, the Hapsburg restorationists, the little green men in Roswell, the secret Irish Catholic demographic conspiracy for world domination, and the fluoride in our water. And you call yourself a conspiracy theorist? Hah!

(Just kidding, of course!)
Posted by: Mike   2004-06-09 10:42:52 AM  

#3  Ima fraid Reagan took the secret of Ambrose Bierces' disappearance to the grave.
Posted by: Shipman   2004-06-09 10:11:08 AM  

#2  The rise of fundamentalist Islamism has been well documented by many experts on middle eastern affairs.

Its roots are well known and stretch back long beyond the Reagan era.

Bill Plante just displayed his own ignorance, nothing else.
Posted by: Anon1   2004-06-09 9:25:22 AM  

#1  7 Degrees of separation... the backbone of all good conspiracies. If they can only hold your attention long enough, the connection of anything to anyone can be established.

I think 9/11 actualy was rooted in an event in NYC back in 1965 when William Paley, CEO and Flounder (L intentional) of CBS decided, on a whim mind you, to go see the Rockettes. You see there was this long-stem lady he use to engage on Tuesdays between the noon and 4 PM shows whose uncle used a dry cleaner who had a car with a broken gas gauge and the Saudi gas would run out, pissing him off - so he write a letter to King Abdul Aziz and tells him to kiss my hairy ass you Wahhabi goat-fucker, but the King couldn't read it and one of his sons, the crazy fucker called Nayef who used to set cats on fire and kick puppies and baby ducks decided he wanted to translate it. He's been really really pissed ever since, so when this really really sick fuck named Osama bin Laden came to his attention, well, he figured it was payback time.

And that's how it goes.
Posted by: .com   2004-06-09 8:51:08 AM  

00:00