You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Britain
Daily Mirror Apologizes for Fake Photos
2004-05-15
IT is now clear that the photographs the Mirror published of British soldiers abusing an Iraqi prisoner were fakes. The evidence against them is not strong enough to convict in a court but that is not the burden of proof the Daily Mirror demands of itself. Our mission is to tell the truth.
Hand me a Kleenex, please...
That is something this newspaper has been doing for more than 100 years and will always strive to do. If ever we fail, we are letting down the people who mean most to us. Our readers. So to you today we apologise for publishing pictures which we now believe were not genuine.
... that we could have determined weren't genuine with less than an hour's work...
We also say sorry to the Queen's Lancashire Regiment and our Army in Iraq for publishing those pictures. The Daily Mirror printed the photographs with glee in good faith. We hoped absolutely believed they were what we were told they were, otherwise we would never have printed them. They provided pictorial evidence of a shocking story of abuse, given to us by two soldiers from the QLR. Since then, four others have told similar stories. Not only has no evidence been produced to disprove what they said, but the thrust of their allegations has been confirmed by the Red Cross and Amnesty International.
So we're hoping somebody might eventually prove it...
But that does not excuse the publication of those photographs. We were the victims of a hoax. And that led to us hoaxing our readers.
"We're victims! Victims, y'unnerstand?"
Many people - especially those who serve in the Queen's Lancashire Regiment - will delight in the Mirror's apology over the hoax pictures. Others will regret that serious allegations of abuse by members of the British Army in Iraq have been diminished by the furore over the pictures. The Mirror's admission that the photographs were not genuine must not allow the Ministry of Defence to avoid dealing with the real issue. The Prime Minister, Defence Secretary and Armed Forces Minister have claimed that our photos were hoaxes. They have been vindicated.
"Oh, cheese! It hurts so bad to say that!"
But they have also insisted that there was no abuse which has not been dealt with and that is simply not true.
"We don't have any proof, but we know it's not true."
Just as the Government turned its considerable firepower on the BBC when Dr David Kelly died, so it has done the same to the Mirror over the allegations of abuse.
Y'mean when the Beebers published lies, falsehoods and calumnies, too?
It is not an honourable way to behave and is leading to growing disenchantment among the British people. The one thing on which all sides agree, and from which the Mirror has never deviated, is admiration for our armed forces and the remarkable job they are once again doing. They are the envy of the world and their reputation for courage and honour is unrivalled.
We'll continue doing our best to undermine it, of course...
A few rotten apples will not sully their good name as long as they are rooted out. That is what the Mirror hoped to achieve with these stories. The hoax photographs are a sad episode in our long and distinguished history. It is now behind us.
It's time to move on to the next episode...
We look forward to a future in which we continue to serve our readers in truth and honesty.
Posted by:Fred

#2  I wonder if Jihad Unspun's editor will likewise resign for publishing fake photos.
Posted by: Mike Sylwester   2004-05-15 11:45:29 PM  

#1  Andrew Sullivan says that the Mirror's editor refused to resign and apologize and had to be escorted from the premises. Apparently his successor put this "apology" together.
Posted by: 11A5S   2004-05-15 11:09:12 PM  

00:00