Submit your comments on this article | ||
Home Front: WoT | ||
Airport Screeners Do Poorly, Panel Told | ||
2004-04-23 | ||
Ervin's testimony was part of two government reports discussed before the House Transportation and Infrastructure's aviation subcommittee yesterday that described the strikingly similar performance between federal security screeners and those working for private companies in a test program at five airports. A second report, conducted by consulting firm BearingPoint, found that at one of the test airports, Kansas City, private security screeners performed better than their federal counterparts. The study concluded that overall "there is no evidence that any of the five privately screened airports performed below the average level of the federal airports."
David M. Stone, the acting head of the Transportation Security Administration, agreed to the meeting but said screener testing today is much more rigorous than it had been. "Testing in the '90s was in no way even comparable to what we do," Stone said. Yesterday's hearing was held to discuss a forthcoming "opt out" program this November, in which more U.S. airports will be eligible to use private screeners. Unlike the security system in place before the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, the private security firms employing the screeners work directly for the TSA, not the airlines. The TSA, which was created after the attacks and employs the airport screeners, did not dispute the performance findings yesterday and said that the results would be used to develop the "opt out" program. | ||
Posted by:Steve White |