You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
CIA warned of al-Qaeda attack as early as 1995
2004-04-16
The CIA warned as early as 1995 that Islamic extremists were likely to attack U.S. aviation, Washington landmarks or Wall Street and by 1997 had identified Osama bin Laden as an emerging threat on U.S. soil, a senior intelligence official said Thursday. The official took the rare step of disclosing information in the closely held National Intelligence Estimate for those two years to counter criticisms in a staff report released Wednesday by the independent commission examining pre-Sept. 11 intelligence failures. That staff report accused the CIA of failing to recognize al-Qaida as a formal terrorist organization until 1999 and mostly regarding bin Laden as a financier instead of a terrorist leader during much of the 1990s.
I'd be willing to bet that Binny has never actually fired one of those AKs he's fond of lugging around at anyone in actual fighting. As far as I know, he's always had a bodyguard around him. His function was to provide the seed money for al-Qaeda. As such, I'd still call him a financier...
But the U.S. intelligence official, who spoke only on condition of anonymity, said the 1997 National Intelligence Estimate produced by the CIA mentioned bin Laden by name as an emerging terrorist threat on its first page. The National Intelligence Estimate is distributed to the president and senior executive branch and congressional intelligence officials. The 1997 assessment, which remains classified, "identified bin Laden and his followers and threats they were making and said it might portend attacks inside the United States," the official said. Philip Zelikow, executive director of the Sept. 11 commission, confirmed the 1997 warning about bin Laden but said it was only two sentences long and lacked any strategic analysis on how to address the threat. "We were well aware of the information and the staff stands by exactly what it says," he said.
NIEs are executive-summary type documents. They're not in-depth. A couple sentences is what most topics get.
The intelligence official also said that while the 1995 intelligence assessment did not mention bin Laden or al-Qaida by name, it clearly warned that Islamic terrorists were intent on striking specific targets inside the United States like those hit on Sept. 11, 2001. The report specifically warned that civil aviation, Washington landmarks such as the White House and Capitol and buildings on Wall Street were at the greatest risk of a domestic terror attack by Muslim extremists, the official said. Deputy CIA Director John McLaughlin testified Wednesday that by early 1996 his agency had developed enough concern about bin Laden to create a special unit to focus on his threat. "We were very focused on this issue," McLaughlin told the commission. The commission's report did credit the CIA after 1997 with collecting vast amounts of intelligence on bin Laden and al-Qaida, which resulted in thousands of individual reports circulated at the highest levels of government. These carried titles such as "Bin Laden Threatening to Attack U.S. Aircraft" in June 1998 and "Bin Laden's Interest in Biological and Radiological Weapons" in February 2001.
Two sentences at the top of the NIE led to a flood of reports subsequently...
Despite this intelligence, the CIA never produced an authoritative summary of al-Qaida's involvement in past terrorist attacks, didn't formally recognize al-Qaida as a group until 1999 and did not fully appreciate bin Laden's role as the leader of a growing extremist movement, the commission said. "There was no comprehensive estimate of the enemy," the commission report alleged.
At the time he was pretty much one of many. He hadn't yet broken out of the pack, much less absorbed the rest of the pack...
But the senior intelligence official said the commission report failed to mention that CIA had produced large numbers of analytical reports on the growth, capabilities, structure and threats posed by al-Qaida throughout the late 1990s and those detailed reports were distributed to the front lines of terror-fighting agencies. The CIA most frequently provided these individual and highly detailed analyses to the White House Counterterrorism Security Group charged with formulating anti-terrorism policies and responses, the official said.
Posted by:Dan Darling

#4  My favorite part of the "what did we know" analysis can be found in the WTC-bombing trial transcripts. Look for where the testimony occurs as to why the building(s) did not collapse, and what it would have taken to collapse them (hint: they even tell what size plane). I'm not saying that's where the turds got the idea from, but it is there nonetheless - publicly available. Immediately known by all interested parties, some of whom were more interested than others.
Posted by: Rawsnacks   2004-04-16 11:53:02 AM  

#3  I find it rather interesting that a lot of these articles are showing up in the mainstream press yet not one mention of who was president at the time.
Posted by: davemac   2004-04-16 9:28:38 AM  

#2  Anyone remember when the "Visa Express" program was put together? If it was after 1995, I think it can be clearly said that Bubba's quest for a Saudi pension outweighed his dedication to US security.
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2004-04-16 8:37:32 AM  

#1  Gorelick in 1995: Oooh don't show this to me. I must avert my eyes. I am violating the rights of those kind Imams by even looking at this!

Please please please hide this

Presidente Bubba : If you act on this. You are breaking the law! Please no please no. . . .

The blind sheik - they'll release him for sure!
Posted by: Anon_of_E-LB-Ca   2004-04-16 1:17:15 AM  

00:00