You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq-Jordan
DEBKA: US Troops Pull out of Major Centers
2004-04-10
DEBKAfile Exclusive Report... Salt to taste.
On Friday, April 9 – Day Six of the Shiite radical uprising - the tide turned in the Iraq war. US-led forces in Iraq were thrown back to the point they had reached exactly one year ago when Saddam Hussein’s colossal statue was toppled by joyous Iraqis. They were faced, according to DEBKAfile’s exclusive military and intelligence sources, with a row of devastating setbacks: ministers were quitting the provisional Iraqi Governing Council set up to hold the fort of government until the handover of sovereignty on June 30; large parts of the New Iraqi Army, police, border guard, protective units for oil installations and intelligence, trained and financed by Washington, were breaking down. Some Iraqi units were handing their weapons and surrendering to the nearest insurgent militias, whether the rebellions radical Shiite Mehdi Army or other guerrilla groups, including al Qaeda.

The third element of the picture flowed from the first two: US troops were ordered to de-escalate military action and pull back from the major fronts of Baghdad’s sprawling northern Shiite slum known as Sadr City, the northern oil city of Mosul and Ar Ramadi at the western tip of the Sunni Triangle. They were told that further coalition troop advances were bound to cause an unacceptable level of civilian and troop casualties. This was the real background to the unilateral US suspension of hostilities on April 9 in the hotbed town of Falllujah, scene of the brutal lynching of four American contractors on March 31.

Saturday, April 10, US Brig.Gen Kimmit called on Iraqi insurgents in Fallujah to join the ceasefire declared unilaterally by US forces and negotiate a way out of the crisis. The call went unheeded as guerrillas continued to attack.

Most surprisingly, American and allied forces were stopped in their tracks not by a popular Iraqi revolution or a mighty army, but by the spotty “strike and scoot” tactics of a radical militia, the ragtag Mehdi Army led by a fringe Shiite leader, 31-year old Moqtada Sadr. His tactics, meticulously plotted by masterminds in Iran and the Hizballah, proved capable of breaking up the military, political and economic edifice the Bush administration had created at great cost on the road to a future democracy.

The impact of the Iraqi reverses on US standing in the world and the Middle East and George W. Bush’s re-election prospects will not be long in coming. America’s allies in the region are aghast. Their leaders are witnessing a stage in the Iraq war in which US-led forces are falling back against the combined strength of terrorists and their sponsors, Iran, Hizballah, Syria, al Qaeda and Iraqi Shiite radicals. The thought has occurred to Jerusalem that this anti-American coalition may well decide to sidestep a direct military confrontation with the American army and follow up its Iraq successes with a newly invigorated military-terrorist offensive against Israel. This sharpened threat looms at the very moment that Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon is working against all odds to sell President Bush and his own Likud Party a plan for Israel’s unilateral disengagement from the Palestinians and renunciation of all Gaza and a handful of West bank settlements. This plan would render Jewish state extremely vulnerable to enemy action, a fact that will not be lost on the winning coalition in Iraq which also sustains the extremist Hamas, or on the Palestinian terrorist movement as a whole.

Israel’s withdrawal from the Gaza Strip would be a gift to Hamas, delivering into the hands of the terrorists threatening to overrun Iraq the further gain of an open enclave, haven and base, on the Mediterranean, that would hem Israel in from the south. They would acquire this asset on top of the Lebanese and Syrian bases on its northern border where the terrorists and their Iranian backers are already poised to strike.

DEBKAfile’s military sources uncover for the first time the sequence of events unfolding in the last 48 hours that brought the US-led coalition army to its present impasse:
1. Thursday night, April 8, US forces, diverted to regain the southern town of al Kut from Sadr’s militia, rolled into the town center. They rolled out again with all speed once they saw the steady barrage directed against them could be halted only by a heavy bombardment of the streets and residential districts with resultant heavy civilian casualties.

2. Later that morning, Shiite and Sunni militias turned their guns on Al Ghraib the hub northwest of Baghdad of American supply routes from the capital to Fallujah, Ramadi and on to the Jordanian capital of Amman. Their gunmen blew up and set fire to an American fuel and food truck, causing casualties, and went on to seize the Al Ghraib semi-military airfield.

3. Conflicting statements issuing from US authorities on the state of play in Fallujah created hours of confusion on Thursday. Administrator Paul Bremer announced a unilateral suspension of military action for humanitarian aid to enter the besieged city and for Iraqi mediators to begin talks with Iraqi guerrilla chiefs; Deputy Director of Operations Brig.-Gen Mark Kimmit countered by stating fighting was continuing, while the US command ordered the troops to hold their fire. Hostilities were halted in Falluja for the same reason US forces redeployed outside al Kut and, as we shall see below, Ar Ramadi: The only way to forcibly seize control of the town centers was to mow down entire civilian populations. Already, the six-day Falluja battle had reportedly claimed 478 Iraqi lives and a civilian exodus had begun, threatening further disorder. US casualties were also climbing too fast – 45 in a week.

4. The same deadly cause-and-effect spiral caused the US command to check its military advance in Ar Ramadi, a key point on strategic route known as The Corridor between the Tharthar and Habbaniyah Lakes. Held in place, American troops had to forego their planned offensive against the mixed Shiite-Sunni forces overrunning large areas between Ar Ramadi and the southern outskirts of Kirkuk. DEBKAfile’s military sources reveal that, several weeks ago, Mehdi Army commanders struck a deal with local Sunni and Turkomen tribal chiefs to allow several hundred secretly trained Shiite fighters to cross their lands en route from Baghdad and Samarra to points north. The militiamen have joined up with the Sunni guerrillas and al Qaeda bands. The have fetched up together outside Kirkuk. The American non-advance leaves this dangerous enclave in northern Iraq free to build up its strength – but for another factor:

5. To meet the encroaching peril, the Kurds of the north have moved military units out of Suleimaniyah and Kirkuk and redeployed them further south at the Turkoman town of Tuz Khumato. The two Kurdish leaders Jalal Talabani and Massoud Barzani have warned Washington that if Shiite and Sunni militias move any further north towards Kirkuk, the Kurdish armies will push southward and smash them - a threat that raises the dread specter of an ethnic bloodbath.

6. Friday afternoon, intelligence reached the US command that a combined Shiite-Sunni-al Qaeda attack on Mosul was in the offing. US forces were ordered to evacuate bases in the city area and barricade themselves in camps outside. The immediate result was the breakdown of Iraqi administrative and police authority in this part of northwestern Iraq. Iraqi police and security officers began surrendering to the various militias including al Qaeda and handing over the weapons distributed by the Americans. The breakdown touched off the flight of tens of thousands from the Sunni suburbs of Mosul. This exodus together with the refugees heading out of Fallujah adds up to a swelling stream of more 100,000 Iraqis moving on the highways of northern and western Iraq to escape hostilities and find safe havens.

7. US forces withdrew from Baghdad’s Sadr City suburb at the same time as they left Mosul. By Friday nightfall, the last US patrol had left the hostile suburb to the control of Sadr’s militia in the hope of stemming further bloodshed on both sides. Saturday morning, however, the Shiite militia turned their guns again on US troops in Baghdad.

8. The breakdown of the US-designed Iraqi security apparatuses in Mosul and Baghdad is catching on fast in other apparently stable parts of the country. According to DEBKAfile’s military sources, a wave of desertions is sweeping the 150,000-strong command and rank-and-file levels of the Iraqi army, border guard and police.

9. Faced with these desertions, the Iraqi Governing Council is beginning to fall apart as one minister after another abandons the government and security ship painstakingly built by Bremer. Turning on its maker, the IGC demands that the US halt its military offensive in Iraq without delay.

10. The hostage-taking campaign waged by the lawless militias is part of a campaign of terror to drive America’s allies into withdrawing their troops from Iraq, so stripping the United States of its international allied support.
Posted by:lyot

#17  lyot> Yes, in my view.

Up to now the whole war on Iraq and Saddam's overthrow had been utterly trivial in relation to the WOT, except only in the way it paved the path for *this* offensive by the Syria-Sadr-Iran axis.
Posted by: Aris Katsaris   2004-04-10 5:32:08 PM  

#16  Aris,

so one could say the WOT is only now starting in Iraq.. (with the alignement Sadr /islamofacists)?
Posted by: lyot   2004-04-10 5:25:31 PM  

#15  Patrick> "It seems to me the Iraq war is not over."

Ya think??

You can choose to see this as the halfpoint of the war, start of the second half, the *important* half... or you can choose to see it as the starting point of a whole new war.

What you can't do is think that Sadr is but a detail. A couple days ago I said he's as important as Saddam -- I'm revising this now to say that he's *more* important than Saddam.

Saddam wasn't allied with the global Islamofascists and Sadr is.

I'm adding a WOT Future concerning him.
Posted by: Aris Katsaris   2004-04-10 5:22:04 PM  

#14  yeah, but they did correctly predict the wave of abductions several months ago..
Posted by: lyot   2004-04-10 4:53:02 PM  

#13  ex-lib: Debka is a rather interesting source of intel rumors. Maybe about 50% of every sentence they write turns out to be true; however the wrong part is often hugely important and changes the gist of the info 180degrees.

They also have a wierd obsession with Imad Mughniyah, blaming him for everything from 9/11 to fleas on dogs.

In other words, I call baloney here.
Posted by: someone   2004-04-10 2:48:46 PM  

#12  I believe this entire experience must make the western democracies (U.S. and Europe) really review what it takes to fight and pacify these Quasi-Mob style groups. Put yourself in the shoes of somebody in Iraq. If the cross the Insurgents what happens? They capture, rape, and murder your family and then you. If you cross the Americans what happens? You may get captured and put in a nice prison with 3-square meals. If you talk bad/back to the insurgents? You get killed. You talk back to the americans, you get on TV.


This same problem has caused the US and the U.N. problems in most of the peacekeeping operations around the world. This is why the U.N. has been found standing around while atrocities happen.


If the world was honest and really wanted to combat this type of despotism it may be time to revisit the Geneva Convention and what rules should be in place during a occupation (i.e. peacekeeping operation). If you truely trust your armies (as I believe most the western armies can be trusted) then we should review what worked after WWII. The local commanders were given wide powers to be the local constable, judge, jurry, and executioners. I believe the current lack of punishiment for fighting the americans right now is why this thing is escalating out of control. I also believe that is why they want some form of government up and running that can start trying and executing the people we catch.


Keep in mind that at the point Japan surrendered the island was highly armed to repel a invasion. Once we started occuping we went around and not only rounded up all the Firearms, but we even took their Swords. If you understand anything about Japaneese culture at that point you would know that this was highly offensive. And I don't buy for a minute that soley the coorporation of the Emperour is what made this work. The military had already shown that they would do what they wanted. I am guessing some heavy handed tactics is what did it.


It seems to me the Iraq war is not over. At this point I would work with the Kurds to develop an army, screw the rest of the country. I would then deploy a special division (like we have at falloga) and work from town to town just like we did with Tikrit and we are doing with Folloja. First establish that we are collecting weapons. Give it a week. Make it know anybody found with weapons will be shot. Plain, simple. This is the same thing we did in Germany. When the week is over start thru the town. Anybody found with weapons is given a quick on the spot trial and is shot.


Unfortunately the rest of the western countries either do not understand this is what is required and will not allow it. Therefore I see no choice here but eventually loosing. Unless of course another major attack is carried out in a western country. Then maybe?
Posted by: Patrick   2004-04-10 2:12:15 PM  

#11  not Saddam, but other high ranking officials.. (this turned out to be true though !) ..
Posted by: lyot   2004-04-10 2:02:57 PM  

#10  Debka also had Saddam on the Syrian vacation coast and in Belorussia.
Posted by: Shipman   2004-04-10 1:51:08 PM  

#9  Debka is, just like Stratfor, a private compagny that 'sells' intelligence on the web.. It's an Israeli compagny, and there often a bit biased. As long as you keep that in mind, it's often a usefull source of information.. (for instance , regarding the abductions in Iraq.. They wrote this already 2-3 months ago..)
Posted by: lyot   2004-04-10 1:24:37 PM  

#8  What is DEBKA? I read about half of this report, freaked out, and scrolled down to the message section. I'd like to know before I invest any time into reading this post. Enlightenment is requested. Thanks.
Posted by: ex-lib   2004-04-10 1:19:13 PM  

#7  JAB: I presume our troops can get to safety and protect themselves, but there is no way we can maintain total control without the IP, etc. contributing to civil order.

I think the problem has been the IP in Fallujah. Instead of contributing to order, they've been contributing to chaos. This is why we have the kind of situation we're encountering there. We've been trying to buy them off, and this hasn't worked. It's time to purge the Fallujah IP, and perhaps impose direct American rule there. The solution may be to hire IP from the Kurdish part of Iraq - people who don't have local ties and are harder for local mobsters to intimidate.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2004-04-10 12:34:12 PM  

#6  Some of this is just Israeli chauvinism - they think know best. And to Israelis that means using limited force to kill limited numbers of terrorists. The reality is that Israeli indecisiveness has encouraged terror for literally decades. Instead of paying the bill at once, they've been paying this bill for decades, with the attendant negative consequences for the Israeli economy.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2004-04-10 12:28:44 PM  

#5  As with all Debka posts, there is likely an element of truth.

The sad fact is that our relatively small occupation force (vs. Army projections) was based on the idea that the Iraqi Police and other security forces could pick up the slack. It's clear that they're doing nothing to help maintain order and are, at least sometimes, joining the insurrection.

We are in a bad negotiating position now that that IGC, which we are attempting to prop up as a legitimate sovereign authority, is opposing us rather than optting for order.

I presume our troops can get to safety and protect themselves, but there is no way we can maintain total control without the IP, etc. contributing to civil order.
Posted by: JAB   2004-04-10 12:27:21 PM  

#4  Journalistic situation normal: sky is falling, doom impending, all is lost.
Posted by: Matt   2004-04-10 12:21:55 PM  

#3  Marines Move Third Battalion to Fallujah

Pass the salt, please.
Posted by: Parabellum   2004-04-10 12:10:28 PM  

#2  I don't dismiss Debka out of hand and all the journalists are holed up in Baghdad. So who knows what happening but the report of Sunnis fleeing Mosul in large numbers has a certain verisimilitude, if the Kurds are mobilizing. Scores will be settled. And facts on the ground created.
Posted by: Phil B   2004-04-10 11:53:54 AM  

#1  I wish we had some alternative "exclusive military and intelligence sources" to provide a more level-headed analysis. Surely a lot of these claims are easily fact-checked.
Posted by: virginian   2004-04-10 11:39:45 AM  

00:00