You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Britain
’Bomb conspiracy’ youth remanded
2004-04-07
A youth arrested in anti-terror raids has been remanded in custody accused of conspiracy to cause explosions. The 17-year-old was one of eight men arrested under anti-terrorism laws in raids last Tuesday. He appeared at Bow Street magistrates court and was remanded to return there on 14 April. Police now have until Thursday evening to continue questioning the seven others and a ninth man who was arrested last Thursday. The charge was put to the youth that: "Between 1 October 2003 and 31 March 2004... you unlawfully and maliciously conspired with others to cause, by an explosive substance, an explosion of a nature likely to endanger life or cause serious damage to property". The charge was made under Section 3 of the Explosive Substances Act 1883. Asked whether he understood the charge the teenager, who was unshaven and dressed in a black sweatshirt and black jogging trousers, said: "Yes".
I wonder if we’ll hear anything from supposedly moderate Muslim clerics who appeared on TV speculating that these loonies would face no charges and thus deserved no condemnation. Well, here be the charges and all I hear is the sound of crickets chirping. Come on gents, let’s hear you...
[Shep - apologies for the BBC’s ’Sneer’ marks!]
Posted by:Howard UK

#3  Super Hose: No, as a juvenile in a Youth Court. Will serve time in a Young Offenders' Institute (Nasty.) and then be moved to big boy's prison. Noticeably, the parents, who live in a modest home, managed to raise £500,000 in bail but even our Judges aren't mad enough to let that happen...
Posted by: Howard UK   2004-04-07 3:06:14 PM  

#2  Howard, is he tried as an adult in the UK?
Posted by: Super Hose   2004-04-07 2:16:14 PM  

#1  My sincere apologies - the last para requires a highlight. 'Tis mine.
Posted by: Howard UK   2004-04-07 6:33:19 AM  

00:00