#1 I guess we need to be more sensitive to our extreme Islamist peoples partys; IOW, we must include in our definition what the definition of 'election' is. To the Islamist extremist, he who got assasinated apparently lost and whoever (did not) shot him apparently won. Its similar to the custom of the Democrats here; where if the will of the people does not coincide with the election and VNS, CNN and others calling a state election erroneously, then you take them to court so you can count those votes just any ol' way you please, until your guy wins! Simply declaring the winner of an (state) election by who got the most votes in a state and hence, the electoral votes, is too arbitrary; it bypasses the nuances of a transfer of power. And we need to strike out the term "Gore Coup Attempt" from the lexicon as well. We need to sensitive: whoever whines the loudest, or shoots the loudest, should be considered the one who will be the most sensitive to the needs of the people. Because, after all its 'fer du chirren'. |