| Submit your comments on this article |
| Iraq delays constitution after day of carnage |
| 2004-03-03 |
| wish this didn’t send the wrong message .... Iraq’s Governing Council on Wednesday declared three days of mourning and announced it was postponing the signing of its interim constitution after a day of carnage in which at least 170 people were killed. A series of co-ordinated attacks on Tuesday targeted two sites in Iraq sacred to Shia Muslims. Three bombs hit Kadhimiya, a northern suburb of Baghdad. A shrine at Karbala, 70km south of the Iraqi capital, was hit by at least five devices. Sir Jeremy Greenstock, Britain’s senior envoy in Iraq, said on Wednesday the interim constitution was a vital step towards a democratic state. Tuesday’s attacks were part of "the last desperate struggle of the violent people to try to destroy this before we hand over power," Sir Jeremy told BBC radio’s Today programme. Predicting "bloody" days in the run-up to the handover of sovereignty to local authorities at the beginning of July, he said the upsurge in violence was expected and would be very difficult to stop. "This is a crunch period for the future of Iraq. Iraqi society has got to realise that they have got to unite against it," he said. Asked how long British troops would be in Iraq, he responded: "My prediction is at least another two years, maybe more than that." yeah. Both of the sites attacked on Tuesday were packed with Shia Muslims from Iraq and overseas celebrating the climax of the mourning period of Ashura. Fakher Jabir, a civil servant in Baghdad, said: "I was coming out of the Iranian school when the first bomb went off about 70 metres away and everyone ducked. Then they started running. The police were trying to calm them down so that vehicles could get through." He added: "At least 35 people were killed in front of me, including women and children. I was loading them on to trucks. I was picking limbs off the street. Am I supposed to be picking arms and hands off the street?" No group claimed responsibility for Tuesday’s violence but the attacks raise the spectre of a civil war in Iraq pitting Sunni against Shia Muslim. Members of Iraq’s Governing Council condemned those responsible for the country’s bloodiest day since the fall of Saddam Hussein as "the forces of evil intent on sowing the seeds of havoc and civil war". Ayatollah Ali Sistani, the leading Shia cleric, blamed occupation forces for failing to provide security and or to control Iraq’s borders adequately. He urged Iraqis to unite and speed up "regaining the injured country’s sovereignty, independence and stability". The US military said suicide bombers and mortars had been used in the Karbala attack. "This was a very sophisticated attack, well co-ordinated," said Brigadier-General Mark Kimmitt, US military spokesman. He said at least 58 were killed at Kadhimiya and at least 112 at Karbala, making a total of 170 deaths. Tuesday’s toll surpassed that of August 19, when Sergio Vieira de Mello, UN special envoy, and 21 others died in Baghdad; that of August 29, when Muhammed Baqir al-Hakim, the head of the Supreme Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq, and at least 84 others were killed in Najaf; and that of February 1, when two suicide bombers killed 105 people, including many senior Kurdish leaders, in Arbil. So great was the carnage that Kadhmiya hospital ran short of blood. Thousands of people swarmed to medical centres in and around Kadhmiya in response to radio appeal for donors. "We are boiling with rage but we will be patient," said eye-witness Ahmed Abbas, as he surveyed hundreds of shoes of the dead and injured in Kadhimiya. "Sunnis have nothing to do with this crime, they were Wahhabis," he added, referring to the puritanical Saudi-based sect which denounces the Shia practice of visiting shrines as pagan. interesting distinction - not all Iraqi Sunnis are willing to sign up to Wahabism Others blamed the Americans for dissolving the country’s security forces. A spokseman for the Governing Council said on Wednesday that although no new date had been set for signing the interim constitution, the document was ready and it was only because of the attacks that the law had been postoned. |
| Posted by:rkb |
| #3 this in nothing new--in 1801 the wahabbis sacked karbala and the shrine of hussain and massacred thousands--these people know the drill--same old same old |
| Posted by: SON OF TOLUI 2004-3-4 4:50:57 AM |
| #2 Sunnis have nothing to do with this crime, they were Wahhabis ooohhh..not good for the Jihadi's that this Wahhabi distinction has been pounded home in such a vivid way. Looks like the Wahhabi's just sucked the wind out of their "Muslim's against the West" global war. Now it's World against Wahhabi's. I'm guessing this big Sunni/Shia group hug was not quite the response the jihadi's were hoping for. |
| Posted by: B 2004-3-3 12:55:34 PM |
| #1 Hey eye-witness Ahmed Abbas. Those wahhabis are just accros the border in SA. Time for some payback? |
| Posted by: Lucky 2004-3-3 12:23:37 PM |